印尼傳播和數字部（KOMDIGI）計劃下週召集WorldCoin和WorldID的開發商。

該行動是在暫時停用的平台，該平台收集了用戶的IRIS數據，以涉嫌違反監管。

The Indonesian Ministry of Communication and Digital (Komdigi) plans to summon the developers of Worldcoin and WorldID next week.

印尼傳播和數字部（KOMDIGI）計劃下週召集WorldCoin和WorldID的開發商。

This action follows the temporary suspension of the platforms, which collect users’ iris data, for alleged regulatory violations.

該行動是在暫時停用的平台，該平台收集了用戶的IRIS數據，以涉嫌違反監管。

Worldcoin operates in Indonesia under PT. Terang Bulan Abadi but is not registered as an Electronic System Operator (PSE).

WorldCoin在PT下在印度尼西亞運作。 Terang Bulan Abadi，但未註冊為電子系統操作員（PSE）。

It also lacks the necessary operational permit, known as TDPSE.

它還缺乏必要的操作許可，稱為TDPSE。

The ministry indicated that the TDPSE was instead issued to PT. Sandina Abadi Nusantara, raising compliance concerns.

該部表示，TDPSE是發給PT的。 Sandina Abadi Nusantara，提出了合規性問題。

🔗 Source: Katadata

🔗來源：Katadata

🧠 Food for thought

🧠思考食物

1️⃣ Indonesia’s digital regulations reflect broader global concerns about biometric data

1️⃣印度尼西亞的數字法規反映了對生物識別數據的廣泛關注

Indonesia’s action against Worldcoin mirrors similar regulatory interventions in multiple countries concerned about iris-scanning technology.

印度尼西亞針對世界幣的行動反映了有關涉及虹膜掃描技術的多個國家的類似監管干預措施。

Brazil banned Worldcoin in January 2025 explicitly citing violations of data protection laws and concerns over the collection of sensitive biometric data1.

巴西在2025年1月禁止世界幣明確訴說違反數據保護法和對收集敏感生物識別數據的擔憂。

Spain’s authorities also upheld a temporary ban on the platform, highlighting the cross-jurisdictional pattern of regulatory caution around permanent biometric identifiers2.

西班牙的當局還維持了對該平台的臨時禁令，強調了圍繞永久性生物識別標識符的跨界數模式2。

This global trend demonstrates how emerging technologies that collect sensitive biometric data are facing increasing scrutiny as regulators weigh innovation against privacy concerns.

這種全球趨勢表明，隨著監管機構權衡創新與隱私問題，收集敏感生物特徵數據的新興技術如何面臨越來越多的審查。

The Indonesian case is particularly significant since the country still lacks a comprehensive data protection law, making regulatory actions like this an important precedent for how biometric data will be governed3.

印尼案件尤其重要，因為該國仍然缺乏全面的數據保護法，這使這樣的監管行為成為如何管理生物識別數據的重要先例。 3。

Indonesia’s government appears to be following the precautionary approach seen in other jurisdictions, prioritizing prevention of potential harm over waiting for problems to emerge.

印度尼西亞的政府似乎正在遵循其他司法管轄區的預防措施，優先考慮預防潛在的損害，而不是等待問題出現。

2️⃣ Electronic System Operator registration reflects Indonesia’s maturing digital governance

2️⃣電子系統操作員註冊反映了印度尼西亞的成熟數字治理

The suspension of Worldcoin highlights Indonesia’s increasingly sophisticated digital regulatory regime that requires proper registration and accountability.

WorldCoin的暫停強調了印度尼西亞越來越複雜的數字監管制度，需要適當的註冊和問責制。

Indonesia’s 2019 Government Regulation No. 71 established a mandatory registration system for all Electronic System Operators (ESOs), creating a legal framework for digital service accountability4.

印度尼西亞的2019年政府第71號法規為所有電子系統運營商（ESO）建立了強制性註冊系統，為數字服務問責制創建了法律框架4。

The requirement that companies accurately register their corporate entities is part of Indonesia’s broader effort to bring order to its rapidly growing digital economy, which is projected to exceed $130 billion by 20255.

公司準確註冊其公司實體的要求是印度尼西亞為快速增長的數字經濟帶來秩序的更廣泛努力的一部分，該數字經濟預計到20255年將超過1300億美元。

This regulatory approach represents an important shift from the relatively unregulated digital environment described in earlier sources, where Indonesia struggled with issues like misinformation and insufficient digital literacy6.

這種監管方法是從早期來源中描述的相對不受管制的數字環境的重要轉變，在該資料中，印度尼西亞在諸如錯誤信息和數字素養不足之類的問題上苦苦掙扎。

The use of different corporate entities for registration (PT Sandina Abadi Nusantara) versus actual operations (PT Terang Bulan Abadi) appears to be the specific compliance issue triggering regulatory action7.

使用不同的公司實體進行註冊（PT Sandina Abadi Nusantara）與實際操作（PT Terang Bulan Abadi）似乎是觸發監管行動的特定合規性問題7。

This case demonstrates how Indonesia is moving toward stricter enforcement of its digital regulations, bringing its approach more in line with international standards while addressing local market conditions.

該案件表明，印度尼西亞如何朝著更嚴格的數字法規執行，使其方法更符合國際標準，同時解決當地市場狀況。

3️⃣ Balancing technological innovation with regulatory compliance presents global challenges

3️⃣平衡技術創新與監管合規性提出了全球挑戰

Worldcoin’s regulatory challenges illustrate the complex balance between cutting-edge technology and the need to operate within existing regulatory frameworks.

WorldCoin的監管挑戰說明了尖端技術與在現有監管框架內運作的需求之間的複雜平衡。

Digital innovators often face a fundamental tension: they develop technologies faster than regulatory frameworks can adapt, creating compliance gray areas that can lead to market access barriers8.

數字創新者通常會面臨基本的緊張局勢：它們比監管框架可以適應的更快地開發技術，從而創造出可能導致市場訪問障礙的合規性灰色區域8。

Indonesia’s growing study of international models like the EU’s Digital Services Act suggests a trend toward more comprehensive and structured governance of digital services9.

印度尼西亞對諸如《歐盟數字服務法》這樣的國際模型的日益增長的研究表明，朝著更全面和結構化的數字服務治理的趨勢9。

However, transplanting frameworks directly presents challenges, as Indonesia’s centralized regulatory approach differs fundamentally from the EU’s decentralized oversight model8.

但是，移植框架直接提出了挑戰，因為印度尼西亞的集中監管方法與歐盟的分散監督模型8根本上有所不同。

The suspension of Worldcoin demonstrates how even well-funded companies with innovative technologies can face significant market barriers when they fail to fully align with local regulatory requirements7.

WorldCoin的暫停錶明，即使是擁有創新技術資金充足的公司，當他們無法完全與當地監管要求完全保持一致時，它們如何面臨重大的市場障礙7。

This case exemplifies a global pattern where digital innovators must navigate an increasingly complex patchwork of national regulations, each with their own specific compliance requirements and enforcement approaches.

這種情況例證了一種全球模式，在該模式下，數字創新者必須在國家法規中逐漸逐漸拼湊而成，每種法規都有自己的特定合規性要求和執行方法。

Recent Worldcoin developments

最近的WorldCoin發展