印尼传播和数字部（KOMDIGI）计划下周召集WorldCoin和WorldID的开发商。

该行动是在暂时停用的平台，该平台收集了用户的IRIS数据，以涉嫌违反监管。

The Indonesian Ministry of Communication and Digital (Komdigi) plans to summon the developers of Worldcoin and WorldID next week.

印尼传播和数字部（KOMDIGI）计划下周召集WorldCoin和WorldID的开发商。

This action follows the temporary suspension of the platforms, which collect users’ iris data, for alleged regulatory violations.

该行动是在暂时停用的平台，该平台收集了用户的IRIS数据，以涉嫌违反监管。

Worldcoin operates in Indonesia under PT. Terang Bulan Abadi but is not registered as an Electronic System Operator (PSE).

WorldCoin在PT下在印度尼西亚运作。 Terang Bulan Abadi，但未注册为电子系统操作员（PSE）。

It also lacks the necessary operational permit, known as TDPSE.

它还缺乏必要的操作许可，称为TDPSE。

The ministry indicated that the TDPSE was instead issued to PT. Sandina Abadi Nusantara, raising compliance concerns.

该部表示，TDPSE是发给PT的。 Sandina Abadi Nusantara，提出了合规性问题。

🔗 Source: Katadata

🔗来源：Katadata

🧠 Food for thought

🧠思考食物

1️⃣ Indonesia’s digital regulations reflect broader global concerns about biometric data

1️⃣印度尼西亚的数字法规反映了对生物识别数据的广泛关注

Indonesia’s action against Worldcoin mirrors similar regulatory interventions in multiple countries concerned about iris-scanning technology.

印度尼西亚针对世界币的行动反映了有关涉及虹膜扫描技术的多个国家的类似监管干预措施。

Brazil banned Worldcoin in January 2025 explicitly citing violations of data protection laws and concerns over the collection of sensitive biometric data1.

巴西在2025年1月禁止世界币明确诉说违反数据保护法和对收集敏感生物识别数据的担忧。

Spain’s authorities also upheld a temporary ban on the platform, highlighting the cross-jurisdictional pattern of regulatory caution around permanent biometric identifiers2.

西班牙的当局还维持了对该平台的临时禁令，强调了围绕永久性生物识别标识符的跨界数模式2。

This global trend demonstrates how emerging technologies that collect sensitive biometric data are facing increasing scrutiny as regulators weigh innovation against privacy concerns.

这种全球趋势表明，随着监管机构权衡创新与隐私问题，收集敏感生物特征数据的新兴技术如何面临越来越多的审查。

The Indonesian case is particularly significant since the country still lacks a comprehensive data protection law, making regulatory actions like this an important precedent for how biometric data will be governed3.

印尼案件尤其重要，因为该国仍然缺乏全面的数据保护法，这使这样的监管行为成为如何管理生物识别数据的重要先例。3。

Indonesia’s government appears to be following the precautionary approach seen in other jurisdictions, prioritizing prevention of potential harm over waiting for problems to emerge.

印度尼西亚的政府似乎正在遵循其他司法管辖区的预防措施，优先考虑预防潜在的损害，而不是等待问题出现。

2️⃣ Electronic System Operator registration reflects Indonesia’s maturing digital governance

2️⃣电子系统操作员注册反映了印度尼西亚的成熟数字治理

The suspension of Worldcoin highlights Indonesia’s increasingly sophisticated digital regulatory regime that requires proper registration and accountability.

WorldCoin的暂停强调了印度尼西亚越来越复杂的数字监管制度，需要适当的注册和问责制。

Indonesia’s 2019 Government Regulation No. 71 established a mandatory registration system for all Electronic System Operators (ESOs), creating a legal framework for digital service accountability4.

印度尼西亚的2019年政府第71号法规为所有电子系统运营商（ESO）建立了强制性注册系统，为数字服务问责制创建了法律框架4。

The requirement that companies accurately register their corporate entities is part of Indonesia’s broader effort to bring order to its rapidly growing digital economy, which is projected to exceed $130 billion by 20255.

公司准确注册其公司实体的要求是印度尼西亚为快速增长的数字经济带来秩序的更广泛努力的一部分，该数字经济预计到20255年将超过1300亿美元。

This regulatory approach represents an important shift from the relatively unregulated digital environment described in earlier sources, where Indonesia struggled with issues like misinformation and insufficient digital literacy6.

这种监管方法是从早期来源中描述的相对不受管制的数字环境的重要转变，在该资料中，印度尼西亚在诸如错误信息和数字素养不足之类的问题上苦苦挣扎。

The use of different corporate entities for registration (PT Sandina Abadi Nusantara) versus actual operations (PT Terang Bulan Abadi) appears to be the specific compliance issue triggering regulatory action7.

使用不同的公司实体进行注册（PT Sandina Abadi Nusantara）与实际操作（PT Terang Bulan Abadi）似乎是触发监管行动的特定合规性问题7。

This case demonstrates how Indonesia is moving toward stricter enforcement of its digital regulations, bringing its approach more in line with international standards while addressing local market conditions.

该案件表明，印度尼西亚如何朝着更严格的数字法规执行，使其方法更符合国际标准，同时解决当地市场状况。

3️⃣ Balancing technological innovation with regulatory compliance presents global challenges

3️⃣平衡技术创新与监管合规性提出了全球挑战

Worldcoin’s regulatory challenges illustrate the complex balance between cutting-edge technology and the need to operate within existing regulatory frameworks.

WorldCoin的监管挑战说明了尖端技术与在现有监管框架内运作的需求之间的复杂平衡。

Digital innovators often face a fundamental tension: they develop technologies faster than regulatory frameworks can adapt, creating compliance gray areas that can lead to market access barriers8.

数字创新者通常会面临基本的紧张局势：它们比监管框架可以适应的更快地开发技术，从而创造出可能导致市场访问障碍的合规性灰色区域8。

Indonesia’s growing study of international models like the EU’s Digital Services Act suggests a trend toward more comprehensive and structured governance of digital services9.

印度尼西亚对诸如《欧盟数字服务法》这样的国际模型的日益增长的研究表明，朝着更全面和结构化的数字服务治理的趋势9。

However, transplanting frameworks directly presents challenges, as Indonesia’s centralized regulatory approach differs fundamentally from the EU’s decentralized oversight model8.

但是，移植框架直接提出了挑战，因为印度尼西亚的集中监管方法与欧盟的分散监督模型8根本上有所不同。

The suspension of Worldcoin demonstrates how even well-funded companies with innovative technologies can face significant market barriers when they fail to fully align with local regulatory requirements7.

WorldCoin的暂停表明，即使是拥有创新技术资金充足的公司，当他们无法完全与当地监管要求完全保持一致时，它们如何面临重大的市场障碍7。

This case exemplifies a global pattern where digital innovators must navigate an increasingly complex patchwork of national regulations, each with their own specific compliance requirements and enforcement approaches.

这种情况例证了一种全球模式，在该模式下，数字创新者必须在国家法规中逐渐逐渐拼凑而成，每种法规都有自己的特定合规性要求和执行方法。

Recent Worldcoin developments

最近的WorldCoin发展