EOS在Vaulta的更名公告中飆升

週三，Vaulta宣布EOS將正式更名為A，作為該項目轉型的一部分，將1：1的令牌交換引入。

The crypto market is seeing green today with EOS leading the charge. Its price is up 19% over the past 24 hours and currently trades at its highest price in 30 days.

加密貨幣市場今天正在看到綠色，而EOS領導了這一指控。在過去的24小時內，其價格上漲了19％，目前以30天內的最高價格進行交易。

The surge follows two major catalysts: a dovish signal from the US Federal Reserve and the announcement of EOS’s rebrand to A, marking a new chapter for the project.

激增遵循了兩個主要的催化劑：美國美聯儲的一個骯髒信號，並宣布EOS的重塑為A，標誌著該項目的新篇章。

As the apex court prepares to pronounce its verdict on Thursday in the same-sex marriage case, a writ petition was filed in the Delhi High Court seeking to declare Section 49 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which defines marriage as a union between a male and female, as "unconstitutional and void".

當最高法院準備在同性婚姻案件中宣布其判決時，德里高等法院提出了令狀請願書，試圖宣布《印度刑法》第49條（IPC）第49條，將婚姻定義為男性和女性之間的婚姻，為“非憲法和虛假”。

The petition, filed by lawyer Ananya Aggarwal, also seeks to declare that "any legal, social and religious practice, custom or tradition which prevents same-sex couples from marrying is unconstitutional and void".

律師Ananya Aggarwal提出的請願書也試圖宣布：“任何法律，社會和宗教實踐，習俗或傳統都阻止了同性夫妻結婚，這是違憲的和無效的”。

"In essence, the plea aims to secure equal marriage rights for same-sex couples in India, a groundbreaking step forward in the ongoing struggle for LGBTQ+ equality," her legal team at AZB & Associates said in a statement.

她在AZB＆Associates的法律團隊在一份聲明中說：“從本質上講，該認罪旨在確保印度同性夫婦平等的婚姻權利，這是在為LGBTQ+ Equality持續鬥爭中邁出的開創性的一步。”

The petition argues that the existing legal definition of marriage as a union between a male and female is discriminatory and violates the fundamental right to equality guaranteed by Article 14 of the Indian Constitution.

請願書認為，現有的將婚姻作為男性和女性之間的聯合的法律定義具有歧視性，並且侵犯了印度憲法第14條保證的基本平等權利。

It further contends that the inability of same-sex couples to marry infringes upon their personal autonomy and self-determination, which are protected by Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and liberty.

它進一步爭辯說，同性夫婦無法與侵犯他們的個人自主權和自決，這受到第21條的保護，這保證了生命和自由權。

"The court should declare that any legal, social and religious practice, custom or tradition which prevents same-sex couples from marrying is unconstitutional and void," the plea urges.

“法院應宣布，任何法律，社會和宗教實踐，習俗或傳統都阻止同性伴侶結婚是違憲的，無效。”

Highlighting the urgency of the matter, the petition notes that same-sex couples in India are currently unable to marry despite having the capacity and willingness to do so.

請願書指出，儘管有能力和願意這樣做的能力和意願，但印度同性夫婦目前仍無法結婚。

"This exclusion has a profound impact on the lives of same-sex couples who are unable to enjoy the legal, social and economic benefits of marriage," it adds.

它補充說：“這種排斥對無法享受婚姻的法律，社會和經濟利益的同性夫婦的生活產生了深遠的影響。”

The apex court is set to deliver its verdict on Thursday on petitions filed by same-sex couples seeking legal recognition for same-sex marriage in the country.

最高法院定於週四對同性夫婦提出的請願書作出判決，該請願書尋求該國同性婚姻的法律認可。

The Centre had told the court that it vehemently opposes same-sex marriage and prefers to leave the matter to Parliament.

該中心已經告訴法院，它強烈反對同性婚姻，並且更喜歡將此事留給議會。