比特幣核心決定即使在爭議之後也要舉起OP_Return護欄

比特幣核心團隊的最新聲明表明，在下一個版本中將實施有爭議的改變OP_Return限制的限制的有爭議的變化。

The Bitcoin Core team has decided to move ahead with one of the most controversial changes proposed in the last year. According to a statement prepared by developer Gregory Sanders, and made in the name of the whole Bitcoin Core team, the next version of the node software will “by default, relay and mine transactions whose OP_RETURN outputs exceed 80 bytes and allow any number of these outputs.”

比特幣核心團隊決定取得去年提出的最具爭議的變化之一。根據開發人員Gregory Sanders準備的聲明，並以整個比特幣核心團隊的名義製作，下一個版本的節點軟件將“默認情況下，默認情況下，繼電器和礦山交易，其OP_Return輸出超過80個字節，並允許任何這些輸出。”

The limit had outlived its utility, as the team was determined to lift this cap which they said was counterproductive, ineffective, and “damaging.”

該團隊決心舉起這一帽子，他們說，他們說適得其反，無效且“有害”。

As it was explained by some core contributors several times during this public debate, the current guardrails were being outsmarted in several ways, including the utilization of private mining accelerators that don’t enforce these policies.

正如一些核心貢獻者在這場公開辯論中多次解釋的那樣，目前的護欄在幾種方面都遙遙領先，包括利用不執行這些政策的私人採礦加速器。

“Large-data inscriptions are happening regardless and can be done in more or less abusive ways; the cap merely channels them into more opaque forms that cause damage to the network,” Sanders explained.

桑德斯解釋說：“無論如何，大型銘文正在發生，並且可以以虐待方式或多或少地進行；帽子僅將其引導成更不透明的形式，從而造成網絡損害。”

For this reason, the core team chose to lift the OP_RETURN cap, as it “aligns default policy with actual network practice, minimises incentives for harmful workarounds, and simplifies the relay path.”

因此，核心團隊選擇舉起OP_Return Cap，因為它“將默認策略與實際網絡實踐保持一致，最大程度地減少了對有害解決方法的激勵措施，並簡化了中繼路徑。”

Knots, an alternative bitcoin client, has seen its implementation rise to 1,572 listening nodes. Meanwhile, Bitcoin Core powers 20,193 public listening nodes according to Coin Dance numbers.

替代性比特幣客戶調子已經看到其實現增加到1,572個聽力節點。同時，根據硬幣舞蹈數字，比特幣核心力量20,193公開聽力節點。

However, the core team says the decision had earned broad but not unanimous support, and encouraged dissenters to run their own modified software to enforce new and stricter policies. The debate before the change saw accusations of developers colluding with companies and the discussion of what constitutes “spam” in the context of the bitcoin blockchain heat up.

但是，核心團隊表示，該決定獲得了廣泛但沒有一致的支持，並鼓勵持不同政見者運行自己的改良軟件來執行新的更嚴格的政策。變更之前的辯論是指控開發商與公司合謀的指控以及在比特幣區塊鏈加熱的背景下構成“垃圾郵件”的討論。