COPA 表示，克雷格·賴特 (Craig Wright) 在被發現冒充中本聰後應支付原告的法律費用

COPA 訴克雷格·賴特 (Craig Wright) 案的審判於週五重新啟動，以確定賴特可能遭受的費用和處罰。

CoinDesk. A group of Bitcoin developers and enthusiasts asked a U.K. court on Friday to grant that Craig Wright pay 85% of the legal costs they incurred in a case that ultimately found him to not be the creator of bitcoin (BTC).

CoinDesk。週五，一群比特幣開發者和愛好者請求英國法院允許克雷格·賴特支付他們在這起案件中所產生的 85% 的法律費用，最終認定他不是比特幣 (BTC) 的創造者。

The Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) members joined a case against Wright in February after he had taken members of the crypto community to court over the years under the premise that he was Nakamoto. COPA members were sued by Wright for claiming he was not the bitcoin creator.

加密貨幣開放專利聯盟 (COPA) 成員在 2 月加入了針對 Wright 的訴訟，此前他多年來以中本聰為前提，將加密貨幣社群的成員告上法庭。 COPA 成員因聲稱自己不是比特幣創造者而被 Wright 起訴。

The English court ruled in COPA's favor in March that that Wright was not the creator of bitcoin and that he did not author the bitcoin whitepaper.

英國法院於 3 月做出了對 COPA 有利的裁決，稱賴特不是比特幣的創造者，也不是他寫了比特幣白皮書。

COPA's legal representatives asked that Wright be given a civil restraint order to stop him from pursuing any other legal court cases, because "he has poured out threats." COPA also offered to submit a list of online posts that Wright should take down.

COPA 的法律代表要求向賴特發出民事限制令，以阻止他追究任何其他法庭案件，因為「他已經發出了威脅」。 COPA 還提出提交賴特應刪除的線上貼文清單。

One of COPA's legal representatives, Jonathan Hough, said that this case should also be put forward for criminal proceedings following the courts judgement that Wright committed multiple forgeries during the trial.

COPA 的法律代表之一 Jonathan Hough 表示，在法院判定賴特在審判期間犯下多起偽造罪之後，此案也應提交刑事訴訟。

"There is a powerful public interest in them [lies] being brought to an end now,” Hough said, pointing to the litigation that spanned more than five years that saw Wright sue COPA members including Coinbase (COIN) and Kraken, among others.

霍夫表示：「現在結束這些謊言，符合公眾的強烈利益。」他指出，Wright 起訴了 COPA 成員，包括 Coinbase (COIN) 和 Kraken 等公司，訴訟持續了五年多。

Hitting back

反擊

Hitting back at the claims, Wright's defense said that not clarifying the perimeters in which Wright can say he is Nakamoto could infringe on his human rights.

賴特的辯方反駁了這些說法，並表示如果不澄清賴特可以說自己是中本聰的範圍，可能會侵犯他的人權。

“What if Dr. Wright sent an email to a medical professional asserting he was Satoshi – that’s a publication of a statement,” Craig Orr, Wright's lawyer, said, adding that the suggestion that Wright take down all his posts was "parasitic."

賴特的律師克雷格·奧爾(Craig Orr) 表示：「如果賴特博士向一名醫學專業人士發送一封電子郵件，聲稱他是中本聰，那會怎樣——這就是一份聲明的發布。

His defense also asked that the amount Wright pays be brought down to 70% of the costs COPA incurred.

他的辯護還要求賴特支付的金額降至 COPA 費用的 70%。

The room was filled with people from the legal world that sought to see the end of this trial. They were able to hear Hough playing back Wright's own words in an Oxford Union video from 2019.

房間裡擠滿了來自法律界的人，他們希望看到這場審判的結束。他們能夠聽到霍夫在 2019 年牛津聯盟的影片中回放賴特自己的話。

“Yes, there is altered pages,” Wright said in the video that bellowed across the court room.

「是的，頁面被修改了，」賴特在法庭上響起的影片中說道。

“So, I’m going to court on this; I don’t need to face trolls in rooms. You know what happens when you lie in the court; you know what happens – for court perjury – you get 20 years. That’s how real things work in the real world outside of the crypto Twitter-storm world. In the real world, people have evidence and rules."

「所以，我要就此告上法庭；我不需要在房間裡面對巨魔。你知道當你在法庭上撒謊時會發生什麼；你知道會發生什麼事——法庭作偽證——你會被判 20 年徒刑。這就是加密推特風暴世界之外的現實世界中真實事物的運作方式。在現實世界中，人們有證據和規則。

The judge was seen to be bombarded by lawyers jumping in to defend clients like Coinbase, who offered new thoughts and didn't agree fully with some of the cost figures that were presented.

法官似乎遭到了為 Coinbase 等客戶辯護的律師的狂轟濫炸，這些律師提出了新的想法，但並不完全同意所提出的一些成本數據。

Mellor, whose expression shifted from certain to ever-more-pensive as the trial went on, decided at the end of it he could not give a judgement at that moment, but he said he'll give a decision on costs first before making a decision on what kind of injunctive relief the court would seek. Injunctive relief is a measure from the court that would seek to prevent defendants from doing something.

隨著審判的進行，梅勒的表情從肯定變得更加沉思，他在審判結束時決定，他當時無法做出判斷，但他表示，他將首先就費用做出決定，然後再做出決定。決定法院將尋求何種類型的禁制令救濟。禁制令救濟是法院旨在阻止被告做某事的一項措施。

The court didn't immediately provide information to CoinDesk seeking more information in the exact timing of the judgement.

法院沒有立即向 CoinDesk 提供信息，以尋求更多有關判決確切時間的信息。