Craig Wright Should Pay Plaintiffs' Legal Bill After Found Posing as Satoshi, COPA Says

The COPA vs Craig Wright trial made a resurgence on Friday to determine what costs and penalties Wright might suffer.

CoinDesk. A group of Bitcoin developers and enthusiasts asked a U.K. court on Friday to grant that Craig Wright pay 85% of the legal costs they incurred in a case that ultimately found him to not be the creator of bitcoin (BTC).

The Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) members joined a case against Wright in February after he had taken members of the crypto community to court over the years under the premise that he was Nakamoto. COPA members were sued by Wright for claiming he was not the bitcoin creator.

The English court ruled in COPA's favor in March that that Wright was not the creator of bitcoin and that he did not author the bitcoin whitepaper.

COPA's legal representatives asked that Wright be given a civil restraint order to stop him from pursuing any other legal court cases, because "he has poured out threats." COPA also offered to submit a list of online posts that Wright should take down.

One of COPA's legal representatives, Jonathan Hough, said that this case should also be put forward for criminal proceedings following the courts judgement that Wright committed multiple forgeries during the trial.

"There is a powerful public interest in them [lies] being brought to an end now,” Hough said, pointing to the litigation that spanned more than five years that saw Wright sue COPA members including Coinbase (COIN) and Kraken, among others.

Hitting back

Hitting back at the claims, Wright's defense said that not clarifying the perimeters in which Wright can say he is Nakamoto could infringe on his human rights.

“What if Dr. Wright sent an email to a medical professional asserting he was Satoshi – that’s a publication of a statement,” Craig Orr, Wright's lawyer, said, adding that the suggestion that Wright take down all his posts was "parasitic."

His defense also asked that the amount Wright pays be brought down to 70% of the costs COPA incurred.

The room was filled with people from the legal world that sought to see the end of this trial. They were able to hear Hough playing back Wright's own words in an Oxford Union video from 2019.

“Yes, there is altered pages,” Wright said in the video that bellowed across the court room.

“So, I’m going to court on this; I don’t need to face trolls in rooms. You know what happens when you lie in the court; you know what happens – for court perjury – you get 20 years. That’s how real things work in the real world outside of the crypto Twitter-storm world. In the real world, people have evidence and rules."

The judge was seen to be bombarded by lawyers jumping in to defend clients like Coinbase, who offered new thoughts and didn't agree fully with some of the cost figures that were presented.

Mellor, whose expression shifted from certain to ever-more-pensive as the trial went on, decided at the end of it he could not give a judgement at that moment, but he said he'll give a decision on costs first before making a decision on what kind of injunctive relief the court would seek. Injunctive relief is a measure from the court that would seek to prevent defendants from doing something.

The court didn't immediately provide information to CoinDesk seeking more information in the exact timing of the judgement.