COPA 表示，克雷格·赖特 (Craig Wright) 在被发现冒充中本聪后应支付原告的法律费用

COPA 诉克雷格·赖特 (Craig Wright) 案的审判于周五重新启动，以确定赖特可能遭受的费用和处罚。

CoinDesk. A group of Bitcoin developers and enthusiasts asked a U.K. court on Friday to grant that Craig Wright pay 85% of the legal costs they incurred in a case that ultimately found him to not be the creator of bitcoin (BTC).

CoinDesk。周五，一群比特币开发者和爱好者请求英国法院允许克雷格·赖特支付他们在这起案件中所产生的 85% 的法律费用，最终认定他不是比特币 (BTC) 的创造者。

The Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) members joined a case against Wright in February after he had taken members of the crypto community to court over the years under the premise that he was Nakamoto. COPA members were sued by Wright for claiming he was not the bitcoin creator.

加密货币开放专利联盟 (COPA) 成员在 2 月份加入了针对 Wright 的诉讼，此前他多年来以中本聪为前提，将加密货币社区的成员告上法庭。 COPA 成员因声称自己不是比特币创造者而被 Wright 起诉。

The English court ruled in COPA's favor in March that that Wright was not the creator of bitcoin and that he did not author the bitcoin whitepaper.

英国法院于 3 月份做出了对 COPA 有利的裁决，称赖特不是比特币的创造者，也不是他撰写了比特币白皮书。

COPA's legal representatives asked that Wright be given a civil restraint order to stop him from pursuing any other legal court cases, because "he has poured out threats." COPA also offered to submit a list of online posts that Wright should take down.

COPA 的法律代表要求向赖特发出民事限制令，以阻止他追究任何其他法庭案件，因为“他已经发出了威胁”。 COPA 还提出提交赖特应删除的在线帖子列表。

One of COPA's legal representatives, Jonathan Hough, said that this case should also be put forward for criminal proceedings following the courts judgement that Wright committed multiple forgeries during the trial.

COPA 的法律代表之一乔纳森·霍夫 (Jonathan Hough) 表示，在法院判定赖特在审判期间犯有多起伪造罪之后，此案也应提交刑事诉讼。

"There is a powerful public interest in them [lies] being brought to an end now,” Hough said, pointing to the litigation that spanned more than five years that saw Wright sue COPA members including Coinbase (COIN) and Kraken, among others.

霍夫表示：“现在结束这些谎言，符合公众的强烈利益。”他指出，Wright 起诉了 COPA 成员，包括 Coinbase (COIN) 和 Kraken 等公司，诉讼持续了五年多。

Hitting back

反击

Hitting back at the claims, Wright's defense said that not clarifying the perimeters in which Wright can say he is Nakamoto could infringe on his human rights.

赖特的辩方反驳了这些说法，称如果不澄清赖特可以说自己是中本聪的范围，可能会侵犯他的人权。

“What if Dr. Wright sent an email to a medical professional asserting he was Satoshi – that’s a publication of a statement,” Craig Orr, Wright's lawyer, said, adding that the suggestion that Wright take down all his posts was "parasitic."

赖特的律师克雷格·奥尔 (Craig Orr) 表示：“如果赖特博士向一名医学专业人士发送一封电子邮件，声称他是中本聪，那会怎样——这就是一份声明的发布。”他补充说，赖特博士删除其所有帖子的建议是“寄生性的”。

His defense also asked that the amount Wright pays be brought down to 70% of the costs COPA incurred.

他的辩护还要求赖特支付的金额降至 COPA 费用的 70%。

The room was filled with people from the legal world that sought to see the end of this trial. They were able to hear Hough playing back Wright's own words in an Oxford Union video from 2019.

房间里挤满了来自法律界的人，他们希望看到这场审判的结束。他们能够听到霍夫在 2019 年牛津联盟的视频中回放赖特自己的话。

“Yes, there is altered pages,” Wright said in the video that bellowed across the court room.

“是的，页面被修改了，”赖特在法庭上响起的视频中说道。

“So, I’m going to court on this; I don’t need to face trolls in rooms. You know what happens when you lie in the court; you know what happens – for court perjury – you get 20 years. That’s how real things work in the real world outside of the crypto Twitter-storm world. In the real world, people have evidence and rules."

“所以，我要就此告上法庭；我不需要在房间里面对巨魔。你知道当你在法庭上撒谎时会发生什么；你知道会发生什么——法庭作伪证——你会被判 20 年徒刑。这就是加密推特风暴世界之外的现实世界中真实事物的运作方式。在现实世界中，人们有证据和规则。”

The judge was seen to be bombarded by lawyers jumping in to defend clients like Coinbase, who offered new thoughts and didn't agree fully with some of the cost figures that were presented.

法官似乎遭到了为 Coinbase 等客户辩护的律师的狂轰滥炸，这些律师提出了新的想法，但并不完全同意所提出的一些成本数据。

Mellor, whose expression shifted from certain to ever-more-pensive as the trial went on, decided at the end of it he could not give a judgement at that moment, but he said he'll give a decision on costs first before making a decision on what kind of injunctive relief the court would seek. Injunctive relief is a measure from the court that would seek to prevent defendants from doing something.

随着审判的进行，梅勒的表情从肯定变得更加沉思，他在审判结束时决定，他当时无法做出判断，但他表示，他将首先就费用做出决定，然后再做出决定。决定法院将寻求何种类型的禁令救济。禁令救济是法院旨在阻止被告做某事的一项措施。

The court didn't immediately provide information to CoinDesk seeking more information in the exact timing of the judgement.

法院没有立即向 CoinDesk 提供信息，以寻求更多有关判决确切时间的信息。