比特币核心决定即使在争议之后也要举起OP_Return护栏

比特币核心团队的最新声明表明，在下一个版本中将实施有争议的改变OP_Return限制的限制的有争议的变化。

The Bitcoin Core team has decided to move ahead with one of the most controversial changes proposed in the last year. According to a statement prepared by developer Gregory Sanders, and made in the name of the whole Bitcoin Core team, the next version of the node software will “by default, relay and mine transactions whose OP_RETURN outputs exceed 80 bytes and allow any number of these outputs.”

比特币核心团队决定取得去年提出的最具争议的变化之一。根据开发人员Gregory Sanders准备的声明，并以整个比特币核心团队的名义制作，下一个版本的节点软件将“默认情况下，默认情况下，继电器和矿山交易，其OP_Return输出超过80个字节，并允许任何这些输出。”

The limit had outlived its utility, as the team was determined to lift this cap which they said was counterproductive, ineffective, and “damaging.”

该团队决心举起这一帽子，他们说，他们说适得其反，无效且“有害”。

As it was explained by some core contributors several times during this public debate, the current guardrails were being outsmarted in several ways, including the utilization of private mining accelerators that don’t enforce these policies.

正如一些核心贡献者在这场公开辩论中多次解释的那样，目前的护栏在几种方面都遥遥领先，包括利用不执行这些政策的私人采矿加速器。

“Large-data inscriptions are happening regardless and can be done in more or less abusive ways; the cap merely channels them into more opaque forms that cause damage to the network,” Sanders explained.

桑德斯解释说：“无论如何，大型铭文正在发生，并且可以以虐待方式或多或少地进行；帽子仅将其引导成更不透明的形式，从而造成网络损害。”

For this reason, the core team chose to lift the OP_RETURN cap, as it “aligns default policy with actual network practice, minimises incentives for harmful workarounds, and simplifies the relay path.”

因此，核心团队选择举起OP_Return Cap，因为它“将默认策略与实际网络实践保持一致，最大程度地减少了对有害解决方法的激励措施，并简化了中继路径。”

Knots, an alternative bitcoin client, has seen its implementation rise to 1,572 listening nodes. Meanwhile, Bitcoin Core powers 20,193 public listening nodes according to Coin Dance numbers.

替代性比特币客户调子已经看到其实现增加到1,572个听力节点。同时，根据硬币舞蹈数字，比特币核心力量20,193公开听力节点。

However, the core team says the decision had earned broad but not unanimous support, and encouraged dissenters to run their own modified software to enforce new and stricter policies. The debate before the change saw accusations of developers colluding with companies and the discussion of what constitutes “spam” in the context of the bitcoin blockchain heat up.

但是，核心团队表示，该决定获得了广泛但没有一致的支持，并鼓励持不同政见者运行自己的改良软件来执行新的更严格的政策。变更之前的辩论是指控开发商与公司合谋的指控以及在比特币区块链加热的背景下构成“垃圾邮件”的讨论。