安東尼·斯卡拉穆奇（Anthony Scaramucci）說，特朗普家族的加密貨幣創造了腐敗和破壞決策的“途徑”

安東尼·斯卡拉穆奇（Anthony Scaramucci）說，特朗普家族的加密貨幣企業為腐敗和破壞政策制定創造了“途徑”，指的是特朗普令牌，USD1和世界自由金融。

After a rather busy period helming SkyBridge Capital and making regular appearances on various financial news programs, former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci has once again made some interesting observations—this time at the FT Digital Asset Summit.

經過一段繁忙的時期，為Skybridge Capital Helight Skybridge Capital並定期出現在各種金融新聞節目中，前白宮通訊總監Anthony Scaramucci再次提出了一些有趣的觀察，這是FT Digital Asset Summit。

Speaking on a panel titled “The Future of Web3 and Tokens,” Scaramucci expressed his skepticism about the Trump family’s ventures into the crypto sphere.

Scaramucci在題為“ Web3和代幣的未來”的小組中表達了他對特朗普家族對加密貨幣領域的冒險的懷疑。

Specifically, he had some choice words for the TRUMP token, USD1, and World Liberty Financial, stating that they're a "distraction" from the broader goal of bipartisan policymaking.

具體來說，他為特朗普的代幣，USD1和世界自由財務有一些選擇，表明他們是兩黨政策制定的更廣泛目標的“分心”。

To be precise, he said:

確切地說，他說：

Let’s give them all the benefit of the doubt. But I do think that there’s pathways for some level of corruption, potential bribery and ‘sinistership,’ if you will. And I think we would just want people not to have those pathways, or to take that completely off the table. We want there to be a bipartisan commitment. I don’t think the President signing a strategic Bitcoin reserve through executive order was the answer for the United States.

讓我們給他們所有疑問的好處。但是我確實認為，如果您願意的話，還有一些腐敗，潛在的賄賂和“罪惡之義”的途徑。而且我認為我們只希望人們不要擁有這些途徑，或者將其完全脫離桌子。我們希望有兩黨的承諾。我認為總統通過行政命令簽署戰略比特幣儲備金是美國的答案。

I think we want there to be a bipartisan commitment and no debate about what should be in the reserve. There’s no debate in the Congress about whether or not we should have rare earth minerals or oil in our strategic reserve.

我認為我們希望有兩黨的承諾，也沒有關於預備役的辯論。國會沒有關於我們是否應該在戰略儲備中擁有稀土礦物或石油的辯論。

We came close to getting a stablecoin bill, but Trump has been so outrageously brazen with his ownership of a crypto company, a stablecoin. Enriching himself and his family, coddling investors by bringing them to the White House. It’s just too much.

我們接近獲得一項穩定法案，但特朗普對他擁有加密貨幣公司（Stablecoin）的所有權非常粗魯。豐富了自己和家人，將投資者帶到白宮來使他們陷入困境。太多了。

There's certainly potential for differing opinions here. Some might view this as a strong statement, highlighting a clear instance of conflict of interest. Others, however, might feel that the criticism is a bit exaggerated and that the observations are part of a broader pattern. For instance, Scaramucci also noted how a president usually wouldn't be involved in the creation of assets like stablecoins, which could form part of a country's economic foundation.

這里肯定有不同意見的潛力。有些人可能認為這是一個強有力的聲明，強調了明確的利益衝突實例。但是，其他人可能會覺得批評有些誇張，觀察結果是更廣泛的模式的一部分。例如，Scaramucci還指出，總統通常不會參與諸如Stablecoins之類的資產的創建，這可能是一個國家經濟基礎的一部分。