安东尼·斯卡拉穆奇（Anthony Scaramucci）说，特朗普家族的加密货币创造了腐败和破坏决策的“途径”

安东尼·斯卡拉穆奇（Anthony Scaramucci）说，特朗普家族的加密货币企业为腐败和破坏政策制定创造了“途径”，指的是特朗普令牌，USD1和世界自由金融。

After a rather busy period helming SkyBridge Capital and making regular appearances on various financial news programs, former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci has once again made some interesting observations—this time at the FT Digital Asset Summit.

经过一段繁忙的时期，为Skybridge Capital Helight Skybridge Capital并定期出现在各种金融新闻节目中，前白宫通讯总监Anthony Scaramucci再次提出了一些有趣的观察，这是FT Digital Asset Summit。

Speaking on a panel titled “The Future of Web3 and Tokens,” Scaramucci expressed his skepticism about the Trump family’s ventures into the crypto sphere.

Scaramucci在题为“ Web3和代币的未来”的小组中表达了他对特朗普家族对加密货币领域的冒险的怀疑。

Specifically, he had some choice words for the TRUMP token, USD1, and World Liberty Financial, stating that they're a "distraction" from the broader goal of bipartisan policymaking.

具体来说，他为特朗普的代币，USD1和世界自由财务有一些选择，表明他们是两党政策制定的更广泛目标的“分心”。

To be precise, he said:

确切地说，他说：

Let’s give them all the benefit of the doubt. But I do think that there’s pathways for some level of corruption, potential bribery and ‘sinistership,’ if you will. And I think we would just want people not to have those pathways, or to take that completely off the table. We want there to be a bipartisan commitment. I don’t think the President signing a strategic Bitcoin reserve through executive order was the answer for the United States.

让我们给他们所有疑问的好处。但是我确实认为，如果您愿意的话，还有一些腐败，潜在的贿赂和“罪恶之义”的途径。而且我认为我们只希望人们不要拥有这些途径，或者将其完全脱离桌子。我们希望有两党的承诺。我认为总统通过行政命令签署战略比特币储备金是美国的答案。

I think we want there to be a bipartisan commitment and no debate about what should be in the reserve. There’s no debate in the Congress about whether or not we should have rare earth minerals or oil in our strategic reserve.

我认为我们希望有两党的承诺，也没有关于预备役的辩论。国会没有关于我们是否应该在战略储备中拥有稀土矿物或石油的辩论。

We came close to getting a stablecoin bill, but Trump has been so outrageously brazen with his ownership of a crypto company, a stablecoin. Enriching himself and his family, coddling investors by bringing them to the White House. It’s just too much.

我们接近获得一项稳定法案，但特朗普对他拥有加密货币公司（Stablecoin）的所有权非常粗鲁。丰富了自己和家人，将投资者带到白宫来使他们陷入困境。太多了。

There's certainly potential for differing opinions here. Some might view this as a strong statement, highlighting a clear instance of conflict of interest. Others, however, might feel that the criticism is a bit exaggerated and that the observations are part of a broader pattern. For instance, Scaramucci also noted how a president usually wouldn't be involved in the creation of assets like stablecoins, which could form part of a country's economic foundation.

这里肯定有不同意见的潜力。有些人可能认为这是一个强有力的声明，强调了明确的利益冲突实例。但是，其他人可能会觉得批评有些夸张，观察结果是更广泛的模式的一部分。例如，Scaramucci还指出，总统通常不会参与诸如Stablecoins之类的资产的创建，这可能是一个国家经济基础的一部分。