隨著SEC正式撤回其針對Ripple Labs的最終主張，XRP訴訟已經發生了重大轉變。

隨著SEC正式撤回其針對Ripple Labs的最終主張，XRP訴訟已經發生了重大轉變。

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has formally withdrawn its final claims against Ripple Labs in the wake of the XRP lawsuit.

在XRP訴訟之後，美國證券交易委員會（SEC）已正式撤回對Ripple Labs的最終要求。

The regulator’s actions have been met with criticism from Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, who calls for legislative clarity. As the XRP lawsuit nearly reaches its closure, Ripple turns its attention to long-term regulatory reform.

監管機構的行動已受到Ripple首席法律官的批評，後者要求立法明確。隨著XRP訴訟幾乎結束，Ripple將注意力轉移到了長期監管改革上。

The SEC sued Ripple in December 2020 for allegedly offering unregistered XRP securities to the public. The case saw key developments, including a 2023 ruling that secondary XRP sales were not securities. The commission later dropped charges against Ripple executives Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen.

SEC於2020年12月起訴Ripple，據稱向公眾提供未註冊的XRP證券。該案看到了關鍵的發展，包括2023年的裁決，即二級XRP銷售不是證券。委員會後來對波紋高管布拉德·加林豪斯（Brad Garlinghouse）和克里斯·拉爾森（Chris Larsen）提出了指控。

After the SEC backed out of further litigation, Ripple’s legal team questioned the motive behind the lawsuit’s initiation.

SEC退出進一步的訴訟後，Ripple的法律團隊質疑訴訟啟動背後的動機。

“Enforcement cannot substitute proper regulation,” said Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s CLO.

Ripple的Clo說：“執法無法替代適當的法規。”

The XRP lawsuit’s outcome has fueled broader concerns about inconsistent oversight in the crypto industry.

XRP訴訟的結果引起了人們對加密行業不一致的監督不一致的廣泛關注。

The U.S. crypto firms face risks due to a lack of clear frameworks, according to Ripple’s legal stance, which emphasized structure over punishment through uncertain litigation.

根據Ripple的法律立場，由於缺乏明確的框架，美國加密貨幣公司面臨風險，該立場強調結構而不是通過不確定的訴訟而不是懲罰。

The XRP lawsuit exposed gaps that persist in digital asset policy enforcement.

XRP訴訟暴露了數字資產政策執法的差距。

Conclusion of the XRP lawsuit sparks renewed appeals for targeted legislation in digital finance.

XRP訴訟的結論引發了針對數字融資中有針對性立法的呼籲。

“Congress must define the rules for crypto in a way that protects consumers and supports American innovation,” said Alderoty. “Without legislation, enforcement creates confusion and disrupts the market.”

Alderoty說：“國會必須以保護消費者並支持美國創新的方式定義加密貨幣的規則。” “沒有立法，執法會造成混亂並破壞市場。”

Multiple industry participants have joined Ripple in demanding that lawmakers replace outdated rules with transparent legal standards. Bills have surfaced, but bipartisan consensus and regulatory alignment remain lacking.

多個行業參與者加入了Ripple，要求立法者用透明的法律標準將過時的規則取代。法案浮出水面，但兩黨共識和監管一致性仍然缺乏。

The XRP lawsuit highlighted how prolonged enforcement actions affect company operations and public trust.

XRP訴訟強調了長期執法行動如何影響公司運營和公共信任。

“Arbitrary regulation hurts all stakeholders: compliant companies, U.S. economic interests, and the broader public,” said Alderoty.

“任意法規損害了所有利益相關者：合規的公司，美國的經濟利益和更廣泛的公眾，” Alderoty說。

Now, Ripple aims to participate in shaping legislation to prevent future legal ambiguity. The XRP lawsuit’s resolution may set a precedent for proactive policy engagement in crypto governance.

現在，Ripple旨在參與製定立法，以防止未來的法律歧義。 XRP訴訟的決議可能為積極的加密治理政策參與樹立先例。

Ripple has positioned itself as a strong advocate for regulatory modernization following the XRP lawsuit’s closure.

在XRP訴訟關閉之後，Ripple已將自己定位為監管現代化的強有力倡導者。

The company now focuses on influencing clear legislative frameworks for digital assets. Ripple sees this shift as essential for stability and growth in the crypto sector.

該公司現在專注於影響數字資產的明確立法框架。 Ripple認為這一轉變對於加密部門的穩定性和增長至關重要。