随着SEC正式撤回其针对Ripple Labs的最终主张，XRP诉讼已经发生了重大转变。

随着SEC正式撤回其针对Ripple Labs的最终主张，XRP诉讼已经发生了重大转变。

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has formally withdrawn its final claims against Ripple Labs in the wake of the XRP lawsuit.

在XRP诉讼之后，美国证券交易委员会（SEC）已正式撤回对Ripple Labs的最终要求。

The regulator’s actions have been met with criticism from Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, who calls for legislative clarity. As the XRP lawsuit nearly reaches its closure, Ripple turns its attention to long-term regulatory reform.

监管机构的行动已受到Ripple首席法律官的批评，后者要求立法明确。随着XRP诉讼几乎结束，Ripple将注意力转移到了长期监管改革上。

The SEC sued Ripple in December 2020 for allegedly offering unregistered XRP securities to the public. The case saw key developments, including a 2023 ruling that secondary XRP sales were not securities. The commission later dropped charges against Ripple executives Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen.

SEC于2020年12月起诉Ripple，据称向公众提供未注册的XRP证券。该案看到了关键的发展，包括2023年的裁决，即二级XRP销售不是证券。委员会后来对波纹高管布拉德·加林豪斯（Brad Garlinghouse）和克里斯·拉尔森（Chris Larsen）提出了指控。

After the SEC backed out of further litigation, Ripple’s legal team questioned the motive behind the lawsuit’s initiation.

SEC退出进一步的诉讼后，Ripple的法律团队质疑诉讼启动背后的动机。

“Enforcement cannot substitute proper regulation,” said Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s CLO.

Ripple的Clo说：“执法无法替代适当的法规。”

The XRP lawsuit’s outcome has fueled broader concerns about inconsistent oversight in the crypto industry.

XRP诉讼的结果引起了人们对加密行业不一致的监督不一致的广泛关注。

The U.S. crypto firms face risks due to a lack of clear frameworks, according to Ripple’s legal stance, which emphasized structure over punishment through uncertain litigation.

根据Ripple的法律立场，由于缺乏明确的框架，美国加密货币公司面临风险，该立场强调结构而不是通过不确定的诉讼而不是惩罚。

The XRP lawsuit exposed gaps that persist in digital asset policy enforcement.

XRP诉讼暴露了数字资产政策执法的差距。

Conclusion of the XRP lawsuit sparks renewed appeals for targeted legislation in digital finance.

XRP诉讼的结论引发了针对数字融资中有针对性立法的呼吁。

“Congress must define the rules for crypto in a way that protects consumers and supports American innovation,” said Alderoty. “Without legislation, enforcement creates confusion and disrupts the market.”

Alderoty说：“国会必须以保护消费者并支持美国创新的方式定义加密货币的规则。” “没有立法，执法会造成混乱并破坏市场。”

Multiple industry participants have joined Ripple in demanding that lawmakers replace outdated rules with transparent legal standards. Bills have surfaced, but bipartisan consensus and regulatory alignment remain lacking.

多个行业参与者加入了Ripple，要求立法者用透明的法律标准将过时的规则取代。法案浮出水面，但两党共识和监管一致性仍然缺乏。

The XRP lawsuit highlighted how prolonged enforcement actions affect company operations and public trust.

XRP诉讼强调了长期执法行动如何影响公司运营和公共信任。

“Arbitrary regulation hurts all stakeholders: compliant companies, U.S. economic interests, and the broader public,” said Alderoty.

“任意法规损害了所有利益相关者：合规的公司，美国的经济利益和更广泛的公众，” Alderoty说。

Now, Ripple aims to participate in shaping legislation to prevent future legal ambiguity. The XRP lawsuit’s resolution may set a precedent for proactive policy engagement in crypto governance.

现在，Ripple旨在参与制定立法，以防止未来的法律歧义。 XRP诉讼的决议可能为积极的加密治理政策参与树立先例。

Ripple has positioned itself as a strong advocate for regulatory modernization following the XRP lawsuit’s closure.

在XRP诉讼关闭之后，Ripple已将自己定位为监管现代化的强有力倡导者。

The company now focuses on influencing clear legislative frameworks for digital assets. Ripple sees this shift as essential for stability and growth in the crypto sector.

该公司现在专注于影响数字资产的明确立法框架。 Ripple认为这一转变对于加密部门的稳定性和增长至关重要。