WorldCoin是SAM Altman支持的IRIS掃描加密貨幣項目，在隱私問題中發起了

Openai聯合創始人Sam Altman於2023年推出了WorldCoin，以使人們具有數字身份，以牢固地在線驗證自己。

OpenAI co-founder Sam Altman launched Worldcoin in 2023 to give people a digital identity to verify themselves securely and anonymously online. At a time when AI is rapidly advancing, Altman believed that a new technology was needed to differentiate between machines and humans.

Openai聯合創始人Sam Altman於2023年推出了WorldCoin，以使人們具有數字身份，以牢固地在線驗證自己。在AI迅速發展的時候，Altman認為需要一種新技術來區分機器和人類。

The idea was to scan people’s irises and, in exchange for their personal data, they would be rewarded with a small amount of cryptocurrency, which would inspire more people to sign up. Altman described it as “proof of personhood.” But as the project expanded, it faced backlash over privacy risks, data safety, fairness, and consent.

這個想法是掃描人們的虹膜，為了換取他們的個人數據，他們將獲得少量加密貨幣的獎勵，這將激發更多的人註冊。奧特曼將其描述為“人格證明”。但是隨著項目的擴大，它對隱私風險，數據安全，公平性和同意麵臨反對。

Tech experts and privacy groups warned that the biometric data from these eye scans is extremely sensitive because the information connects directly to who you are as a person. And since you can’t change your eyes like your password, a hacker could easily stalk or steal from you.

技術專家和隱私組織警告說，這些眼睛掃描的生物識別數據非常敏感，因為信息直接與您作為一個人的身份聯繫在一起。而且，由於您無法像密碼那樣改變眼睛，因此黑客可以輕鬆地跟踪或從您身上偷竊。

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) also criticized the project, saying the company was rushing to collect information from third-world countries because the people were unaware of how Worldcoin would use, protect, or delete their data. People would also be less likely to refuse to participate in the project.

電子邊境基金會（EFF）還批評了該項目，稱該公司急於從第三世界國家收集信息，因為人們不知道WorldCoin將如何使用，保護或刪除其數據。人們也不太可能拒絕參加該項目。

In addition, people raised concerns about consent because Worldcoin would sometimes target individuals with limited internet access or education. This means they are less likely to understand the risks and make a more informed decision. Some users claimed they only registered for Worldcoin for the free cryptocurrency but did not know how the company would use their data.

此外，人們提出了對同意的擔憂，因為WorldCoin有時會針對互聯網訪問或教育有限的個人。這意味著他們不太可能理解風險並做出更明智的決定。一些用戶聲稱他們僅在免費的加密貨幣上註冊了WorldCoin，但不知道該公司將如何使用其數據。

Worldcoin also faced scrutiny over transparency, as it failed to clearly explain how user data was anonymized, who had access to it, and what would happen if the company changed ownership or shut down. Although Worldcoin claimed to anonymize the data, experts pointed out that it could still be traced back to the individual with the right tools. Once a scan is in the company’s database, it could remain there indefinitely.

WorldCoin還面臨透明度的審查，因為它未能清楚地解釋用戶數據是如何匿名化的，誰可以訪問它的以及如果公司更改所有權或關閉的情況會發生什麼。儘管WorldCoin聲稱要匿名數據，但專家指出，它仍然可以通過正確的工具來追溯到個人。一旦掃描在公司的數據庫中，它可能會無限期地保留在那裡。

Due to these mounting concerns, various governments launched investigations into Worldcoin’s practices. Nations like Spain, Portugal, and Kenya are at the forefront of demanding that Worldcoin cease operations in their regions. These actions are unfolding quickly as many governments are integrating new legislation to better protect user interests.

由於這些越來越多的問題，各個政府對WorldCoin的做法進行了調查。西班牙，葡萄牙和肯尼亞等國家處於要求世界幣在其地區停止運營的最前沿。隨著許多政府正在整合新的立法以更好地保護用戶利益，這些行動正在迅速發展。

However, after several countries, like Portugal, Spain, Vietnam, and Indonesia, slammed the brakes on Worldcoin, the company quickly tried to save its image and respond to the criticism.

但是，在葡萄牙，西班牙，越南和印度尼西亞等多個國家抨擊了世界幣的剎車，該公司迅速試圖保存其形象並應對批評。

In an effort to regain trust, Worldcoin shared the code behind its Orb scanning device to help people understand how it worked and prove that it wasn’t secretly collecting more data than it claimed. The company also introduced “Personal Custody” to allow users to control their data by storing it themselves or deleting it from the database.

為了重新獲得信任，WorldCoin分享了其Orb掃描設備背後的代碼，以幫助人們了解其工作原理，並證明其並沒有秘密收集比聲稱的更多數據。該公司還引入了“個人監護權”，以使用戶可以自己存儲或從數據庫中刪除數據來控制其數據。

Moreover, Worldcoin brought in independent experts to perform third-party audits to ascertain that the company’s technology and policies aligned with the regulations the way Worldcoin claimed.

此外，WorldCoin引入了獨立專家進行第三方審核，以確定該公司的技術和政策與WorldCoin聲稱的規定保持一致。

But despite these efforts, legal and tech experts still have mixed opinions. Some say it was the first step toward making things right, but others claim that these endeavors are not enough and that the company still has big problems to solve.

但是，儘管做出了這些努力，但法律和技術專家仍然有不同的看法。有人說這是使事情正確的第一步，但其他人則聲稱這些努力還不夠，並且該公司仍然有很大的問題要解決。

Therefore, even after all the changes Worldcoin has made, the gap between what the company claims and what regulators believe remains wide. It seems that regulators want more from the company, which means the company still has more work to do and more steps to take before the bans are lifted.

因此，即使在世界幣進行了所有變化之後，公司聲稱的聲稱與監管機構認為的差距仍然很廣泛。看來監管機構希望從公司那裡得到更多，這意味著該公司仍然有更多的工作要做，並且在取消禁令之前要採取更多步驟。