英國上訴法院部分駁回了119億美元的比特幣SV（BSV），將訴訟推向Binance

英國上訴法院作出了決定性的裁決，以支持二元和幾次加密交易所。它部分駁回了對比特幣SV（BSV）的提起訴訟的11.90000000000400萬美元。

The UK Court of Appeal has partially dismissed a lawsuit against Binance and several crypto exchanges, rejecting claims by investors who argued they were deprived of potential returns when Bitcoin SV (BSV) was delisted from major trading platforms in 2019.

英國上訴法院部分駁回了針對Binance和幾次加密交易所的訴訟，拒絕了投資者的索賠，他們認為當比特幣SV（BSV）在2019年從主要交易平台上脫穎而出時，他們被剝奪了潛在的回報。

The case, which began six years ago, involved a coordinated decision by Binance, Kraken, ShapeShift, and Bittylicious to delist BSV, a Bitcoin fork associated with entrepreneur Craig Wright. Investors, who banded together to sue the exchanges in England, claimed the move unfairly prevented BSV from gaining value.

該案始於六年前，涉及Binance，Kraken，Shapeshift和Bittylicious Delist BSV的協調決定，Delist BSV是與企業家Craig Wright相關的比特幣叉。投資者團結起來起訴英格蘭的交流，聲稱此舉不公平地阻止了BSV獲得價值。

The plaintiffs alleged that the exchanges acted anti-competitively, and that BSV’s price would have increased significantly if it had remained accessible on major trading platforms. However, the court rejected those arguments.

原告聲稱，交易所在反學上採取了反競爭的行動，如果BSV的價格在主要交易平台上仍然可以訪問，BSV的價格將顯著上漲。但是，法院駁回了這些論點。

In a judgment dated May 21, Sir Geoffrey Vos, who authored the ruling, stated that investors were not legally entitled to any particular market performance from the cryptocurrency.

在5月21日的一項判決中，撰寫該裁決的杰弗裡·沃斯爵士（Sir Geoffrey Vos）表示，投資者在合法上有權從加密貨幣中獲得任何特定的市場績效。

“It is common ground that BSV was not ‘a unique crypto-currency without reasonably similar substitutes’,” the judge wrote.

法官寫道：“在沒有合理相似的替代品的情況下，BSV不是'獨特的加密貨幣，這是共同的。”

The court held that other digital assets could have served as alternatives, and investors should have adjusted their positions accordingly. “They had a duty to mitigate their losses,” Vos added, emphasizing that market participants must respond proactively to protect their investments.

法院裁定，其他數字資產本來可以作為替代方案，投資者應該相應地調整其頭寸。 Vos補充說：“他們有責任減輕損失。”他強調，市場參與者必須積極回應以保護他們的投資。

A key part of the lawsuit was the claim of “loss of a chance,” the supposed opportunity to profit from future BSV gains had it not been delisted. The court rejected this as speculative, noting that cryptocurrency investments are inherently volatile.

訴訟的一個關鍵部分是聲稱“失去機會”，如果沒有將其從未來的BSV收益中獲利的假定機會。法院駁回了這一點，並指出加密貨幣投資本質上是波動的。

“Cryptos are, by nature, volatile investments,” the court ruled, stating that it would not award compensation based on imagined profits. Only verifiable losses could be considered for compensation.

法院裁定：“加密貨幣本質上是動蕩的投資。”只能考慮可驗證的損失以進行補償。

This ruling has implications for crypto-related lawsuits, as it sets a precedent against entertaining claims based on missed opportunities or unproven financial projections in the rapidly evolving crypto space.

這項裁決對與加密相關的訴訟有影響，因為它為基於錯過的機會或迅速發展的加密貨幣領域的未經證實的財務預測提供了先例。

The decision marks a significant legal victory for Binance and the other exchanges involved. While the lawsuit was only partially dismissed, the court’s rejection of the central claims undermines the bulk of the plaintiffs’ case.

該決定標誌著Binance和其他涉及的其他交流的巨大法律勝利。雖然訴訟僅被部分駁回，但法院拒絕中央索賠卻破壞了原告案件的大部分。

Crucially, the ruling clarifies that crypto exchanges are not obligated to keep every token listed, nor are they responsible for the market effects of delisting decisions unless direct harm can be proven.

至關重要的是，裁決澄清說，加密交易所沒有義務保留所有令牌，也不應對脫穎而出的決策的市場影響負責，除非可以證明直接傷害。

Even if investors were unaware of the delisting events at the time, the court ruled their claims would be limited to the token’s value before delisting plus any directly quantifiable losses, not potential future profits.

即使投資者當時沒有意識到這一挑剔的事件，法院裁定他們的索賠將僅限於代幣的價值，然後再提取任何直接可量化的損失，而不是潛在的未來利潤。

For Binance, the timing is strategic. The company is also attempting to dismiss a separate claim brought by the FTX estate, which seeks $1.76 billion in damages.

對於binance來說，時機是戰略性的。該公司還試圖駁回FTX遺產提出的單獨索賠，該索賠要求賠償17.6億美元。

In that case, Binance argues that the FTX collapse was due to internal mismanagement and fraud, not any action by Binance. With the UK Court’s reasoning in its favor, Binance may add momentum to its broader legal defense strategy.

在那種情況下，二手體認為，FTX崩潰是由於內部管理不善和欺詐，而不是任何行動。憑藉英國法院對其有利的推理，Binance可能會為其更廣泛的法律辯護戰略增加動力。

The post UK Court Partially Dismisses $11.9 Billion Lawsuit Against Binance, Several Crypto Exchanges appeared first on Coin Edition.

英國郵政法院部分駁回了針對Binance的119億美元訴訟，幾次加密貨幣交易所首次出現在Coin Edition上。

See original on Coin Edition

請參閱《硬幣版》上的原版