英国上诉法院部分驳回了119亿美元的比特币SV（BSV），将诉讼推向Binance

英国上诉法院作出了决定性的裁决，以支持二元和几次加密交易所。它部分驳回了对比特币SV（BSV）的提起诉讼的11.90000000000400万美元。

The UK Court of Appeal has partially dismissed a lawsuit against Binance and several crypto exchanges, rejecting claims by investors who argued they were deprived of potential returns when Bitcoin SV (BSV) was delisted from major trading platforms in 2019.

英国上诉法院部分驳回了针对Binance和几次加密交易所的诉讼，拒绝了投资者的索赔，他们认为当比特币SV（BSV）在2019年从主要交易平台上脱颖而出时，他们被剥夺了潜在的回报。

The case, which began six years ago, involved a coordinated decision by Binance, Kraken, ShapeShift, and Bittylicious to delist BSV, a Bitcoin fork associated with entrepreneur Craig Wright. Investors, who banded together to sue the exchanges in England, claimed the move unfairly prevented BSV from gaining value.

该案始于六年前，涉及Binance，Kraken，Shapeshift和Bittylicious Delist BSV的协调决定，Delist BSV是与企业家Craig Wright相关的比特币叉。投资者团结起来起诉英格兰的交流，声称此举不公平地阻止了BSV获得价值。

The plaintiffs alleged that the exchanges acted anti-competitively, and that BSV’s price would have increased significantly if it had remained accessible on major trading platforms. However, the court rejected those arguments.

原告声称，交易所在反学上采取了反竞争的行动，如果BSV的价格在主要交易平台上仍然可以访问，BSV的价格将显着上涨。但是，法院驳回了这些论点。

In a judgment dated May 21, Sir Geoffrey Vos, who authored the ruling, stated that investors were not legally entitled to any particular market performance from the cryptocurrency.

在5月21日的一项判决中，撰写该裁决的杰弗里·沃斯爵士（Sir Geoffrey Vos）表示，投资者在合法上有权从加密货币中获得任何特定的市场绩效。

“It is common ground that BSV was not ‘a unique crypto-currency without reasonably similar substitutes’,” the judge wrote.

法官写道：“在没有合理相似的替代品的情况下，BSV不是'独特的加密货币，这是共同的。”

The court held that other digital assets could have served as alternatives, and investors should have adjusted their positions accordingly. “They had a duty to mitigate their losses,” Vos added, emphasizing that market participants must respond proactively to protect their investments.

法院裁定，其他数字资产本来可以作为替代方案，投资者应该相应地调整其头寸。 Vos补充说：“他们有责任减轻损失。”他强调，市场参与者必须积极回应以保护他们的投资。

A key part of the lawsuit was the claim of “loss of a chance,” the supposed opportunity to profit from future BSV gains had it not been delisted. The court rejected this as speculative, noting that cryptocurrency investments are inherently volatile.

诉讼的一个关键部分是声称“失去机会”，如果没有将其从未来的BSV收益中获利的假定机会。法院驳回了这一点，并指出加密货币投资本质上是波动的。

“Cryptos are, by nature, volatile investments,” the court ruled, stating that it would not award compensation based on imagined profits. Only verifiable losses could be considered for compensation.

法院裁定：“加密货币本质上是动荡的投资。”只能考虑可验证的损失以进行补偿。

This ruling has implications for crypto-related lawsuits, as it sets a precedent against entertaining claims based on missed opportunities or unproven financial projections in the rapidly evolving crypto space.

这项裁决对与加密相关的诉讼有影响，因为它为基于错过的机会或迅速发展的加密货币领域的未经证实的财务预测提供了先例。

The decision marks a significant legal victory for Binance and the other exchanges involved. While the lawsuit was only partially dismissed, the court’s rejection of the central claims undermines the bulk of the plaintiffs’ case.

该决定标志着Binance和其他涉及的其他交流的巨大法律胜利。虽然诉讼仅被部分驳回，但法院拒绝中央索赔却破坏了原告案件的大部分。

Crucially, the ruling clarifies that crypto exchanges are not obligated to keep every token listed, nor are they responsible for the market effects of delisting decisions unless direct harm can be proven.

至关重要的是，裁决澄清说，加密交易所没有义务保留所有令牌，也不应对脱颖而出的决策的市场影响负责，除非可以证明直接伤害。

Even if investors were unaware of the delisting events at the time, the court ruled their claims would be limited to the token’s value before delisting plus any directly quantifiable losses, not potential future profits.

即使投资者当时没有意识到这一挑剔的事件，法院裁定他们的索赔将仅限于代币的价值，然后再提取任何直接可量化的损失，而不是潜在的未来利润。

For Binance, the timing is strategic. The company is also attempting to dismiss a separate claim brought by the FTX estate, which seeks $1.76 billion in damages.

对于binance来说，时机是战略性的。该公司还试图驳回FTX遗产提出的单独索赔，该索赔要求赔偿17.6亿美元。

In that case, Binance argues that the FTX collapse was due to internal mismanagement and fraud, not any action by Binance. With the UK Court’s reasoning in its favor, Binance may add momentum to its broader legal defense strategy.

在那种情况下，二手体认为，FTX崩溃是由于内部管理不善和欺诈，而不是任何行动。凭借英国法院对其有利的推理，Binance可能会为其更广泛的法律辩护战略增加动力。

The post UK Court Partially Dismisses $11.9 Billion Lawsuit Against Binance, Several Crypto Exchanges appeared first on Coin Edition.

英国邮政法院部分驳回了针对Binance的119亿美元诉讼，几次加密货币交易所首次出现在Coin Edition上。

See original on Coin Edition

请参阅《硬币版》上的原版