市值: $3.2952T -0.400%
體積(24小時): $109.7451B -17.560%
  • 市值: $3.2952T -0.400%
  • 體積(24小時): $109.7451B -17.560%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $3.2952T -0.400%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$103213.489089 USD

-0.87%

ethereum
ethereum

$2478.060347 USD

-3.73%

tether
tether

$1.000294 USD

0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.340442 USD

-2.38%

bnb
bnb

$639.902968 USD

-2.76%

solana
solana

$165.573535 USD

-3.90%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999833 USD

-0.01%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.215521 USD

-4.54%

cardano
cardano

$0.740663 USD

-4.91%

tron
tron

$0.268205 USD

-2.54%

sui
sui

$3.701769 USD

-5.37%

chainlink
chainlink

$15.311254 USD

-5.63%

avalanche
avalanche

$22.461779 USD

-5.77%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$26.959403 USD

0.04%

stellar
stellar

$0.287254 USD

-2.77%

加密貨幣新聞文章

沙奎爾·奧尼爾(Shaquille O'Neal)已同意與投資者達成1100萬美元

2025/05/17 04:46

沙奎爾·奧尼爾(Shaquille O'Neal)已同意與投資者兌現1100萬美元,以解決他未能透露Astrals NFT和代幣銷售是未註冊的證券的主張。

沙奎爾·奧尼爾(Shaquille O'Neal)已同意與投資者達成1100萬美元

This case, titled "Melendez v. Shaq (Trust)”, case no. 1:23-cv-21912, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, concerns claims that Shaquille O'Neal and other named defendants promoted and sold Astrals NFTs and tokens as unregistered securities.

此案,標題為“ Melendezv。Shaq(Trust)”,案件編號。 1:23-CV-21912在佛羅里達州南部地區的美國地方法院擔心,Shaquille O'Neal和其他名稱的被告促進並出售了Astrals NFTS和代幣作為未註冊的證券。

The case arose from the persistent claims circulating online that several celebrities, including Shaquille O'Neal, were involved in selling NFTs as unregistered securities.

該案源於在線流傳的持續說法,即包括沙奎爾·奧尼爾(Shaquille O'Neal)在內的幾位名人參與將NFT作為未註冊證券出售。

Earlier this year, a group of investors filed a class action lawsuit against O'Neal and others, alleging that they failed to disclose material facts about the token offering and failed to register the offering with the SEC. The lawsuit also claimed that O'Neal and the other defendants made false and misleading statements about the NFTs and tokens to induce investors to purchase them.

今年早些時候,一群投資者對奧尼爾和其他人提起了集體訴訟,指控他們未能披露有關代幣發行的重大事實,並且未能在SEC登記發行。該訴訟還聲稱,奧尼爾和其他被告對NFT和令牌發表了虛假和誤導性的陳述,以誘使投資者購買它們。

The complaint specifically mentioned that O'Neal touted the "unique utility" of the Astrals NFTs, claiming they granted access to exclusive content, events, and a metaverse gaming project. However, according to the complaint, O'Neal and the other defendants never disclosed that the utility was limited and ultimately worthless.

投訴特別提到,奧尼爾(O'Neal)吹捧了星體NFT的“獨特效用”,聲稱他們授予了獲得獨家內容,事件和元遊戲項目的訪問權限。但是,根據投訴,奧尼爾和其他被告從未透露該公用事業有限,最終毫無價值。

The investors also alleged that O'Neal and the other defendants promoted the Galaxy Tokens (GLXY) in a deceptive manner, highlighting their connection to the Astrals NFTs to create the impression that they were part of the same offering. This, they argued, was crucial because the GLXY tokens were being sold in violation of federal securities law.

投資者還聲稱,奧尼爾和其他被告以欺騙性的方式促進了銀河令牌(GLXY),從而強調了他們與Astrals NFT的聯繫,以產生與同一產品的一部分的印象。他們認為,這是至關重要的,因為Glxy代幣被違反聯邦證券法出售。

The lawsuit further alleged that O'Neal and the other defendants engaged in a scheme to defraud investors by making false and misleading statements about the NFTs and tokens, and that they failed to disclose material facts about the offering.

該訴訟進一步聲稱,奧尼爾和其他被告通過對NFT和令牌發表虛假和誤導性的陳述來欺騙投資者,他們未能透露有關發行的重大事實。

Following the lawsuit, O'Neal and the other defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that the investors' claims were time-barred and that the NFTs and tokens were not subject to federal securities law.

在訴訟之後,奧尼爾(O'Neal)和其他被告駁回了申訴,認為投資者的主張是有時的,而NFTS和代幣不受聯邦證券法的約束。

After reviewing the case, the court granted the motion to dismiss in part and denied it in part. The court dismissed the claims against O'Neal and some of the other defendants, finding that the investors' claims were time-barred. However, the court refused to dismiss the claims against certain of the named defendants and allowed the case to proceed in part.

在審查此案後,法院批准了該動議部分駁回,並部分否認了這一動議。法院駁回了針對奧尼爾和其他一些被告的索賠,裁定投資者的索賠是有時的。但是,法院拒絕駁回針對某些指定被告的索賠,並允許該案部分進行。

The case has since been settled, and investors who purchased Astrals NFTs or Galaxy Tokens during the relevant period may be eligible for compensation from the settlement.

此後已經解決此案,在相關期間購買Astrals NFTS或Galaxy代幣的投資者可能有資格從和解中獲得賠償。

The case name is Melendez v. Shaq (Trust), case no. 1:23-cv-21912, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The law firm filing the case is Baum Hedlund.

案例名稱是Melendez訴Shaq(Trust),案例編號。 1:23-CV-21912,在佛羅里達州南區的美國地方法院。提起訴訟的律師事務所是鮑姆·赫德隆德(Baum Hedlund)。

The claims in the case are that the defendants, including Shaquille O'Neal, sold Astrals NFT and tokens as unregistered securities and failed to disclose material facts about the offering. The investors who purchased the NFTs or tokens are now seeking compensation for their losses.

該案的說法是,包括沙奎爾·奧尼爾(Shaquille O'Neal)在內的被告將Astrals NFT和令牌出售為未註冊的證券,並且未能透露有關發行的重大事實。購買NFTS或代幣的投資者現在正在尋求損失的賠償。

The time period for purchasing Astrals NFTs is May 24, 2022, to January 14, 2025, and for purchasing Galaxy Tokens (GLXY) is before January 14, 2025.

購買星體NFT的時間段是2022年5月24日至2025年1月14日,購買星系令牌(GLXY)的時間段是在2025年1月14日之前。

According to the law firm, the claims will be distributed among the investors who file a claim. The firm recommends that investors submit their claim early to maximize their chances of receiving a larger payout.

據律師事務所稱,這些索賠將在提出索賠的投資者中分配。該公司建議投資者儘早提交索賠,以最大程度地提出獲得更大支出的機會。

The last day to exclude your name from the claims is November 16, 2023.

從索賠中排除您的名字的最後一天是2023年11月16日。

Investors can learn more about the settlement and how to file a claim on the law firm’s website.

投資者可以了解有關和解的更多信息,以及如何在律師事務所的網站上提出索賠。

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年05月17日 其他文章發表於