市值: $3.2952T -0.400%
成交额(24h): $109.7451B -17.560%
  • 市值: $3.2952T -0.400%
  • 成交额(24h): $109.7451B -17.560%
  • 恐惧与贪婪指数:
  • 市值: $3.2952T -0.400%
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
热门新闻
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
bitcoin
bitcoin

$103213.489089 USD

-0.87%

ethereum
ethereum

$2478.060347 USD

-3.73%

tether
tether

$1.000294 USD

0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.340442 USD

-2.38%

bnb
bnb

$639.902968 USD

-2.76%

solana
solana

$165.573535 USD

-3.90%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999833 USD

-0.01%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.215521 USD

-4.54%

cardano
cardano

$0.740663 USD

-4.91%

tron
tron

$0.268205 USD

-2.54%

sui
sui

$3.701769 USD

-5.37%

chainlink
chainlink

$15.311254 USD

-5.63%

avalanche
avalanche

$22.461779 USD

-5.77%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$26.959403 USD

0.04%

stellar
stellar

$0.287254 USD

-2.77%

加密货币新闻

沙奎尔·奥尼尔(Shaquille O'Neal)已同意与投资者达成1100万美元

2025/05/17 04:46

沙奎尔·奥尼尔(Shaquille O'Neal)已同意与投资者兑现1100万美元,以解决他未能透露Astrals NFT和代币销售是未注册的证券的主张。

沙奎尔·奥尼尔(Shaquille O'Neal)已同意与投资者达成1100万美元

This case, titled "Melendez v. Shaq (Trust)”, case no. 1:23-cv-21912, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, concerns claims that Shaquille O'Neal and other named defendants promoted and sold Astrals NFTs and tokens as unregistered securities.

此案,标题为“ Melendezv。Shaq(Trust)”,案件编号。 1:23-CV-21912在佛罗里达州南部地区的美国地方法院担心,Shaquille O'Neal和其他名称的被告促进并出售了Astrals NFTS和代币作为未注册的证券。

The case arose from the persistent claims circulating online that several celebrities, including Shaquille O'Neal, were involved in selling NFTs as unregistered securities.

该案源于在线流传的持续说法,即包括沙奎尔·奥尼尔(Shaquille O'Neal)在内的几位名人参与将NFT作为未注册证券出售。

Earlier this year, a group of investors filed a class action lawsuit against O'Neal and others, alleging that they failed to disclose material facts about the token offering and failed to register the offering with the SEC. The lawsuit also claimed that O'Neal and the other defendants made false and misleading statements about the NFTs and tokens to induce investors to purchase them.

今年早些时候,一群投资者对奥尼尔和其他人提起了集体诉讼,指控他们未能披露有关代币发行的重大事实,并且未能在SEC登记发行。该诉讼还声称,奥尼尔和其他被告对NFT和令牌发表了虚假和误导性的陈述,以诱使投资者购买它们。

The complaint specifically mentioned that O'Neal touted the "unique utility" of the Astrals NFTs, claiming they granted access to exclusive content, events, and a metaverse gaming project. However, according to the complaint, O'Neal and the other defendants never disclosed that the utility was limited and ultimately worthless.

投诉特别提到,奥尼尔(O'Neal)吹捧了星体NFT的“独特效用”,声称他们授予了获得独家内容,事件和元游戏项目的访问权限。但是,根据投诉,奥尼尔和其他被告从未透露该公用事业有限,最终毫无价值。

The investors also alleged that O'Neal and the other defendants promoted the Galaxy Tokens (GLXY) in a deceptive manner, highlighting their connection to the Astrals NFTs to create the impression that they were part of the same offering. This, they argued, was crucial because the GLXY tokens were being sold in violation of federal securities law.

投资者还声称,奥尼尔和其他被告以欺骗性的方式促进了银河令牌(GLXY),从而强调了他们与Astrals NFT的联系,以产生与同一产品的一部分的印象。他们认为,这是至关重要的,因为Glxy代币被违反联邦证券法出售。

The lawsuit further alleged that O'Neal and the other defendants engaged in a scheme to defraud investors by making false and misleading statements about the NFTs and tokens, and that they failed to disclose material facts about the offering.

该诉讼进一步声称,奥尼尔和其他被告通过对NFT和令牌发表虚假和误导性的陈述来欺骗投资者,他们未能透露有关发行的重大事实。

Following the lawsuit, O'Neal and the other defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that the investors' claims were time-barred and that the NFTs and tokens were not subject to federal securities law.

在诉讼之后,奥尼尔(O'Neal)和其他被告驳回了申诉,认为投资者的主张是有时的,而NFTS和代币不受联邦证券法的约束。

After reviewing the case, the court granted the motion to dismiss in part and denied it in part. The court dismissed the claims against O'Neal and some of the other defendants, finding that the investors' claims were time-barred. However, the court refused to dismiss the claims against certain of the named defendants and allowed the case to proceed in part.

在审查此案后,法院批准了该动议部分驳回,并部分否认了这一动议。法院驳回了针对奥尼尔和其他一些被告的索赔,裁定投资者的索赔是有时的。但是,法院拒绝驳回针对某些指定被告的索赔,并允许该案部分进行。

The case has since been settled, and investors who purchased Astrals NFTs or Galaxy Tokens during the relevant period may be eligible for compensation from the settlement.

此后已经解决此案,在相关期间购买Astrals NFTS或Galaxy代币的投资者可能有资格从和解中获得赔偿。

The case name is Melendez v. Shaq (Trust), case no. 1:23-cv-21912, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The law firm filing the case is Baum Hedlund.

案例名称是Melendez诉Shaq(Trust),案例编号。 1:23-CV-21912,在佛罗里达州南区的美国地方法院。提起诉讼的律师事务所是鲍姆·赫德隆德(Baum Hedlund)。

The claims in the case are that the defendants, including Shaquille O'Neal, sold Astrals NFT and tokens as unregistered securities and failed to disclose material facts about the offering. The investors who purchased the NFTs or tokens are now seeking compensation for their losses.

该案的说法是,包括沙奎尔·奥尼尔(Shaquille O'Neal)在内的被告将Astrals NFT和令牌出售为未注册的证券,并且未能透露有关发行的重大事实。购买NFTS或代币的投资者现在正在寻求损失的赔偿。

The time period for purchasing Astrals NFTs is May 24, 2022, to January 14, 2025, and for purchasing Galaxy Tokens (GLXY) is before January 14, 2025.

购买星体NFT的时间段是2022年5月24日至2025年1月14日,购买星系令牌(GLXY)的时间段是在2025年1月14日之前。

According to the law firm, the claims will be distributed among the investors who file a claim. The firm recommends that investors submit their claim early to maximize their chances of receiving a larger payout.

据律师事务所称,这些索赔将在提出索赔的投资者中分配。该公司建议投资者尽早提交索赔,以最大程度地提出获得更大支出的机会。

The last day to exclude your name from the claims is November 16, 2023.

从索赔中排除您的名字的最后一天是2023年11月16日。

Investors can learn more about the settlement and how to file a claim on the law firm’s website.

投资者可以了解有关和解的更多信息,以及如何在律师事务所的网站上提出索赔。

免责声明:info@kdj.com

所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!

如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。

2025年05月17日 发表的其他文章