![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Cryptocurrency News Articles
Shaquille O’Neal Has Agreed to Settle $11M with Investors
May 17, 2025 at 04:46 am
Shaquille O’Neal has agreed to settle $11M with investors to resolve claims that he failed to disclose that Astrals NFT and token sales were unregistered securities.
This case, titled "Melendez v. Shaq (Trust)”, case no. 1:23-cv-21912, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, concerns claims that Shaquille O'Neal and other named defendants promoted and sold Astrals NFTs and tokens as unregistered securities.
The case arose from the persistent claims circulating online that several celebrities, including Shaquille O'Neal, were involved in selling NFTs as unregistered securities.
Earlier this year, a group of investors filed a class action lawsuit against O'Neal and others, alleging that they failed to disclose material facts about the token offering and failed to register the offering with the SEC. The lawsuit also claimed that O'Neal and the other defendants made false and misleading statements about the NFTs and tokens to induce investors to purchase them.
The complaint specifically mentioned that O'Neal touted the "unique utility" of the Astrals NFTs, claiming they granted access to exclusive content, events, and a metaverse gaming project. However, according to the complaint, O'Neal and the other defendants never disclosed that the utility was limited and ultimately worthless.
The investors also alleged that O'Neal and the other defendants promoted the Galaxy Tokens (GLXY) in a deceptive manner, highlighting their connection to the Astrals NFTs to create the impression that they were part of the same offering. This, they argued, was crucial because the GLXY tokens were being sold in violation of federal securities law.
The lawsuit further alleged that O'Neal and the other defendants engaged in a scheme to defraud investors by making false and misleading statements about the NFTs and tokens, and that they failed to disclose material facts about the offering.
Following the lawsuit, O'Neal and the other defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that the investors' claims were time-barred and that the NFTs and tokens were not subject to federal securities law.
After reviewing the case, the court granted the motion to dismiss in part and denied it in part. The court dismissed the claims against O'Neal and some of the other defendants, finding that the investors' claims were time-barred. However, the court refused to dismiss the claims against certain of the named defendants and allowed the case to proceed in part.
The case has since been settled, and investors who purchased Astrals NFTs or Galaxy Tokens during the relevant period may be eligible for compensation from the settlement.
The case name is Melendez v. Shaq (Trust), case no. 1:23-cv-21912, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The law firm filing the case is Baum Hedlund.
The claims in the case are that the defendants, including Shaquille O'Neal, sold Astrals NFT and tokens as unregistered securities and failed to disclose material facts about the offering. The investors who purchased the NFTs or tokens are now seeking compensation for their losses.
The time period for purchasing Astrals NFTs is May 24, 2022, to January 14, 2025, and for purchasing Galaxy Tokens (GLXY) is before January 14, 2025.
According to the law firm, the claims will be distributed among the investors who file a claim. The firm recommends that investors submit their claim early to maximize their chances of receiving a larger payout.
The last day to exclude your name from the claims is November 16, 2023.
Investors can learn more about the settlement and how to file a claim on the law firm’s website.
Disclaimer:info@kdj.com
The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!
If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.
-
- Bitcoin (BTC) Price Eyes Crash to $99K or Lower as Three Recent Developments Hint BTC's Price May Crash
- May 17, 2025 at 07:35 pm
- Over the past 10 days, Bitcoin (BTC) has been moving sideways, consolidating between $105k to $101k. But three recent developments hint BTC's price may crash lower to $99k or lower.
-
-
-
-
-
- Elon Musk Changed His X Profile Name to "Kekius Maximus" and Set His Profile Picture to Him Wearing Armour with the Text "Emperor Kekius Maximus"
- May 17, 2025 at 07:25 pm
- Elon Musk changed his profile name from "Gorklon Rust" to "Kekius Maximus" and set the profile picture of him wearing armour with the text "Emperor Kekius Maximus".
-
-
-
- Dogecoin is Shifting Into Next Gear Right Now as On-Chain Activity Explodes. Remittix (RTX) is Leading the Meme Coin Charge
- May 17, 2025 at 07:15 pm
- Dogecoin is shifting into next gear right now as on-chain activity explodes. It's leading the meme coin charge with a solid 46% gain in the last 30 days