法官拒絕Ripple和SEC的和解企圖，將訴訟的未來置於不確定性

Ripple與美國證券交易委員會（SEC）之間的長期法律鬥爭還遠遠沒有結束。一直監督備受矚目的案件的Analisa Torres法官正式拒絕了雙方最近的和解請求，將訴訟的未來再次陷入了不確定性。

The long-running legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues, as Judge Analisa Torres has officially rejected a recent settlement request from both parties.

隨著Analisa Torres法官正式拒絕雙方的最新和解請求，Ripple與美國證券交易委員會（SEC）之間的長期法律鬥爭仍在繼續。

The future of the lawsuit remains uncertain after Judge Torres, who has been overseeing the high-profile case, threw the request back into the mix.

在監督備受矚目的案件的托雷斯法官將請求重新融入了混音之後，訴訟的未來仍然不確定。

Recently, both Ripple and the SEC agreed to settle their long-running legal dispute, aiming to wrap things up quickly. However, Judge Torres denied their joint request, calling it “procedurally improper.”

最近，Ripple和SEC都同意解決他們長期的法律糾紛，旨在迅速結束事情。但是，托雷斯法官否認了他們的共同要求，稱其為“程序不當”。

If jurisdiction were restored to this Court, the Court would deny the parties’ motion as procedurally improper. The parties’ request is made by implication under Rule 62.1, applicable when a case is on appeal. But this case is not on appeal.

如果將管轄權恢復到該法院，法院將否認當事方在程序上的動議不當。當事方的要求是根據規則62.1的暗示提出的，適用於案件上訴。但是此案沒有上訴。

— Judge Torres (Analisa)

- 托雷斯法官（分析）