法官拒绝Ripple和SEC的和解企图，将诉讼的未来置于不确定性

Ripple与美国证券交易委员会（SEC）之间的长期法律斗争还远远没有结束。一直监督备受瞩目的案件的Analisa Torres法官正式拒绝了双方最近的和解请求，将诉讼的未来再次陷入了不确定性。

The long-running legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues, as Judge Analisa Torres has officially rejected a recent settlement request from both parties.

随着Analisa Torres法官正式拒绝双方的最新和解请求，Ripple与美国证券交易委员会（SEC）之间的长期法律斗争仍在继续。

The future of the lawsuit remains uncertain after Judge Torres, who has been overseeing the high-profile case, threw the request back into the mix.

在监督备受瞩目的案件的托雷斯法官将请求重新融入了混音之后，诉讼的未来仍然不确定。

Recently, both Ripple and the SEC agreed to settle their long-running legal dispute, aiming to wrap things up quickly. However, Judge Torres denied their joint request, calling it “procedurally improper.”

最近，Ripple和SEC都同意解决他们长期的法律纠纷，旨在迅速结束事情。但是，托雷斯法官否认了他们的共同要求，称其为“程序不当”。

If jurisdiction were restored to this Court, the Court would deny the parties’ motion as procedurally improper. The parties’ request is made by implication under Rule 62.1, applicable when a case is on appeal. But this case is not on appeal.

如果将管辖权恢复到该法院，法院将否认当事方在程序上的动议不当。当事方的要求是根据规则62.1的暗示提出的，适用于案件上诉。但是此案没有上诉。

— Judge Torres (Analisa)

- 托雷斯法官（分析）