Market Cap: $3.5162T 2.070%
Volume(24h): $163.1221B -7.100%
  • Market Cap: $3.5162T 2.070%
  • Volume(24h): $163.1221B -7.100%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.5162T 2.070%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$111233.607824 USD

0.62%

ethereum
ethereum

$2710.400604 USD

4.44%

tether
tether

$0.999989 USD

0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.466558 USD

2.62%

bnb
bnb

$689.250459 USD

0.85%

solana
solana

$183.771663 USD

5.32%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999812 USD

0.00%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.251507 USD

4.57%

cardano
cardano

$0.827639 USD

5.75%

tron
tron

$0.274246 USD

1.47%

sui
sui

$3.897754 USD

-2.37%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$35.462900 USD

17.82%

chainlink
chainlink

$17.006311 USD

4.47%

avalanche
avalanche

$25.733231 USD

9.34%

stellar
stellar

$0.310183 USD

4.44%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Judge Rejects Ripple and SEC's Settlement Attempt, Throwing the Future of the Lawsuit Into Uncertainty

May 23, 2025 at 03:30 pm

The long-running legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is far from over. Judge Analisa Torres, who has been overseeing the high-profile case, has officially rejected a recent settlement request from both parties, throwing the future of the lawsuit into uncertainty once again.

The long-running legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues, as Judge Analisa Torres has officially rejected a recent settlement request from both parties.

The future of the lawsuit remains uncertain after Judge Torres, who has been overseeing the high-profile case, threw the request back into the mix.

Recently, both Ripple and the SEC agreed to settle their long-running legal dispute, aiming to wrap things up quickly. However, Judge Torres denied their joint request, calling it “procedurally improper.”

If jurisdiction were restored to this Court, the Court would deny the parties’ motion as procedurally improper. The parties’ request is made by implication under Rule 62.1, applicable when a case is on appeal. But this case is not on appeal.

— Judge Torres (Analisa)

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on May 23, 2025