印度尼西亞傳播和數字部（KOMDIGI）計劃下週召集WorldCoin和WorldID的開發商。

該行動是在暫時停用的平台，該平台收集了用戶的IRIS數據，以涉嫌違反監管。

Indonesia’s Ministry of Communication and Digital (Komdigi) plans to summon Worldcoin and WorldID’s developers next week.

印度尼西亞的傳播和數字部（KOMDIGI）計劃下週召集WorldCoin和Worldid的開發人員。

This follows the ministry’s decision to temporarily suspend the platforms, known for collecting users’ iris data, for alleged regulatory violations.

這是在該部決定暫時暫停以收集用戶虹膜數據而聞名的平台的決定，以涉嫌違反監管。

According to a report by Katadata, Komdigi is summoning the developers to discuss the platforms’ operational permits and registration status in Indonesia.

根據Katadata的一份報告，Komdigi正在召集開發商討論平台在印度尼西亞的運營許可證和註冊狀態。

Worldcoin’s operations in Indonesia are carried out by PT. Terang Bulan Abadi, which is not registered as an Electronic System Operator (PSE). This registration is mandatory for foreign companies providing digital services in Indonesia, as stipulated by a 2019 government regulation.

WorldCoin在印度尼西亞的業務由PT進行。 Terang Bulan Abadi，未註冊為電子系統操作員（PSE）。根據2019年政府法規規定，該註冊對於在印度尼西亞提供數字服務的外國公司必須進行註冊。

Moreover, the ministry pointed out that the operational permit, known as TDPSE, was issued to PT. Sandina Abadi Nusantara, while the platforms are presenting a different corporate entity.

此外，該部指出，被稱為TDPSE的運營許可已發行給PT。桑迪娜·阿巴迪·努桑塔拉（Sandina Abadi Nusantara），而平台則展示另一個公司實體。

This discrepancy, along with the lack of complete registration documents, led to the decision to halt Worldcoin’s activities and summon the developers next week.

這種差異以及缺乏完整的註冊文件，導致決定停止Worldcoin的活動，並在下週召集開發商。

Earlier this week, Komdigi announced the suspension of Worldcoin and WorldID’s operations in Indonesia due to a lack of operational permits and complete registration documents.

本週早些時候，由於缺乏運營許可證和完整的註冊文件，科姆迪吉宣布了暫停世界幣和世界化在印度尼西亞的行動。

The ministry began investigating the platforms after receiving reports of iris data collection and potential privacy violations.

在收到有關虹膜數據收集和潛在侵犯隱私的報告後，該部開始調查這些平台。

Local reports suggest that the platforms’ failure to register as a PSE and the discrepancies in corporate entities used for registration and operations were key factors in the suspension decision.

本地報告表明，該平台未註冊為PSE，並且用於註冊和操作的公司實體的差異是停賽決定的關鍵因素。

The ministry also highlighted that Worldcoin’s activities were already suspended in Brazil earlier this year due to violations of data protection laws.

該部還強調，由於違反數據保護法的行為，今年早些時候，WorldCoin的活動已經被暫停在巴西。

In January 2025, Brazil’s data protection agency (ANPD) announced sanctions against the crypto startup for notifying users about the processing of their personal data in an incomplete and unclear manner.

2025年1月，巴西數據保護局（ANPD）宣布對加密貨幣初創公司的製裁，以通知用戶以不完整和不清楚的方式處理其個人數據。

The agency said that Worldcoin’s actions violated the country’s General Data Protection Law (LGPD).

該機構說，世界幣的行動違反了該國的一般數據保護法（LGPD）。

In addition to the administrative sanctions, ANPD also ordered the startup to fully comply with the LGPD by providing complete and transparent information to users about the types of personal data collected and how it will be used.

除了管理制裁外，ANPD還訂購了該初創公司通過向用戶提供有關收集的個人數據類型以及如何使用它的完整信息，以完全遵守LGPD。

Earlier this year, Spain’s highest administrative court upheld a temporary ban on Worldcoin, imposed by the country’s data protection agency (AEPD).

今年早些時候，西班牙最高的行政法院維持了該國數據保護局（AEPD）施加的WorldCoin的臨時禁令。

The ruling follows a complaint filed by a union of technological and digital workers (CCOO), who argued that the platform’s activities violated the European Union’s data protection law, known as GDPR.

該裁決是在技術和數字工人聯盟（CCOO）提出的一項申訴之後，他認為該平台的活動違反了歐盟的數據保護法，稱為GDPR。

AEPD had initially imposed a provisional measure to halt Worldcoin’s operations in December 2024 after finding that the platform was not fully compliant with GDPR.

AEPD最初在發現該平台不完全符合GDPR之後，於2024年12月對WorldCoin的運營採取了臨時措施。

In its ruling, the court stated that the platform’s failure to provide sufficient information to users about their rights and how their data will be processed led to the decision to uphold the ban.

法院在其裁決中指出，該平台未能向用戶提供有關其權利以及如何處理數據的足夠信息，導致決定堅持禁令的決定。

The court also noted that the union’s complaint was deemed relevant and admissible, and the administrative sanctions imposed by AEPD were appropriate given the nature of the violations.

法院還指出，工會的申訴被認為是相關和可接受的，鑑於違法行為的性質，AEPD實施的行政制裁是適當的。

This case highlights the challenges faced by emerging technologies in adapting to the changing regulatory landscape.

此案強調了新興技術在適應不斷變化的監管格局方面面臨的挑戰。

As technology evolves rapidly, lawmakers and regulators are tasked with keeping pace and ensuring that new innovations are used responsibly and ethically.

隨著技術的迅速發展，立法者和監管機構的任務是保持步伐並確保以負責任和道德的方式使用新的創新。

In the case of Worldcoin, the varying interpretations of data protection laws and cross-border enforcement posed difficulties for the startup in launching its services fully.

對於WorldCoin而言，對數據保護法和跨境執法的不同解釋為這家初創公司充分發射其服務帶來了困難。