以太坊錢包持有人今天剛剛損失了將近260萬美元

據報導，一家以太坊錢包持有人在5月26日（據報導是錯誤地複制了假錢包地址）後，今天5月26日在兩次繫帶（USDT）交易中損失了近260萬美元。

An Ethereum wallet holder has reportedly lost nearly $2.6 million in two Tether (USDT) transactions after copying a fake wallet address by mistake.

據報導，一家以太坊錢包持有人在錯誤地複制假錢包地址後，在兩次繫帶（USDT）交易中損失了近260萬美元。

The large-value transfers were flagged by blockchain security monitoring tool ScamSniffer within a short window, raising immediate concerns over possible exploit-linked behavior or unauthorized asset movement.

大價值轉移是通過在一個短窗口內通過區塊鏈安全監控工具騙局標記的，這引起了人們對可能的利用鏈接行為或未經授權的資產移動的立即擔憂。

The sender’s wallet, which begins with the identifier “0x86C0300F,” made two high-value USDT transactions to the same suspicious recipient wallet address, “0x4668EE74.” The first, smaller transaction of about 843,166.83 USDT went through at approximately 10:58 AM ET on Thursday, May 25.

發件人的錢包以標識符“ 0x86C0300F”開頭，對同一可疑收件人錢包地址“ 0x4668EE74”進行了兩項高價值USDT交易。大約843,166.83 USDT的第一次較小交易在5月25日星期四美國東部時間大約在美國東部時間上午10:58進行。

A second, even larger transaction of around 1,754,893.45 USDT followed at around 3:17 PM ET on Thursday. Together, these two transactions add up to a staggering 2,598,060.29 USDT lost.

週四下午3:17左右，第二次甚至更大的交易約為1,754,893.45 USDT。這兩項交易在一起，加起來達到了驚人的2,598,060.29 USDT。

ScamSniffer flagged the activity due to the repetition of such large transfers between the same two addresses in a short timeframe. This is behavior often seen in address spoofing incidents, where scammers create fake addresses that closely mimic legitimate ones, or in cases of mistaken fund redirection due to copy-paste errors from tainted transaction histories.

由於在短時間內相同兩個地址之間的重複轉移，因此Scamsniffer標記了這項活動。這是在地址欺騙事件中經常看到的行為，在該事件中，詐騙者創建的偽造地址非常模仿合法的地址，或者由於污染交易歷史記錄的副本誤差而導致的基金重定向錯誤。

The sender is reportedly the same individual who previously lost $840,000 in a separate spam-related address manipulation incident. This history makes the current loss even more tragic and highlights the persistent nature of these attack vectors.

據報導，發件人是同一個人，以前在另一起與垃圾郵件相關的地址操作事件中損失了840,000美元。這一歷史使當前的損失更加悲慘，並突出了這些攻擊向量的持續性。

According to the publicly available transaction records, a total of twelve separate USDT movements were logged between the sender’s and the recipient’s wallet. Most of these prior movements involved zero-value transactions.

根據公開可用的交易記錄，在發件人和收件人的錢包之間，總共記錄了十二個單獨的USDT動作。這些先前的運動中的大多數涉及零值交易。

These zero-value transfers are often used by scammers to “poison” a user’s transaction history with look-alike addresses, hoping the user will accidentally copy the fake address for a future, larger transaction. The appearance of such probing transfers in this wallet’s history adds further weight to suspicions of ongoing malicious activity targeting the victim

這些零價值轉移通常被騙子使用，用相似地址“毒化”用戶的交易歷史記錄，希望用戶意外地將假地址複製為未來的，更大的交易。在這個錢包的歷史中，這種探測轉移的外觀增加了對受害者的持續惡意活動的懷疑

The second large, loss-making transaction was reported to have occurred just 11 minutes before ScamSniffer identified and flagged the suspicious activity. The earlier, smaller (but still substantial) transfer was made about four hours before that. ScamSniffer noted that the wallet’s interaction history likely played a crucial role in this costly error, with the victim potentially copying the fake address from their prior transfer logs, a common pitfall for users not meticulously verifying recipient addresses.

據報導，第二大大型損失交易發生在騙局識別並標記可疑活動的僅11分鐘之前。在此之前大約四個小時，較早的較小（但仍然很大）的轉移是進行的。 Scamsniffer指出，錢包的互動歷史可能在這一昂貴的錯誤中起著至關重要的作用，受害者可能會從先前的轉移日誌中復制假地址，這是對用戶的常見陷阱，對於未經精心驗證的接收者地址而言。

No smart contract interactions or known service provider engagements were linked to the recipient wallet that received the nearly $2.6 million in USDT. The absence of any external transaction metadata strongly increases the likelihood that these USDT transfers were not part of any legitimate service or payment but were instead directly sent to an address controlled by a scammer or an attacker exploiting a user error.

沒有智能合同互動或已知的服務提供商的參與與收到近260萬美元的收件錢包有關。沒有任何外部交易元數據很大程度上增加了這些USDT轉移不屬於任何合法服務或付款的可能性，而是直接發送到由騙子控制的地址或利用用戶錯誤的攻擊者控制的地址。