以太坊钱包持有人今天刚刚损失了将近260万美元

据报道，一家以太坊钱包持有人在5月26日（据报道是错误地复制了假钱包地址）后，今天5月26日在两次系带（USDT）交易中损失了近260万美元。

An Ethereum wallet holder has reportedly lost nearly $2.6 million in two Tether (USDT) transactions after copying a fake wallet address by mistake.

据报道，一家以太坊钱包持有人在错误地复制假钱包地址后，在两次系带（USDT）交易中损失了近260万美元。

The large-value transfers were flagged by blockchain security monitoring tool ScamSniffer within a short window, raising immediate concerns over possible exploit-linked behavior or unauthorized asset movement.

大价值转移是通过在一个短窗口内通过区块链安全监控工具骗局标记的，这引起了人们对可能的利用链接行为或未经授权的资产移动的立即担忧。

The sender’s wallet, which begins with the identifier “0x86C0300F,” made two high-value USDT transactions to the same suspicious recipient wallet address, “0x4668EE74.” The first, smaller transaction of about 843,166.83 USDT went through at approximately 10:58 AM ET on Thursday, May 25.

发件人的钱包以标识符“ 0x86C0300F”开头，对同一可疑收件人钱包地址“ 0x4668EE74”进行了两项高价值USDT交易。大约843,166.83 USDT的第一次较小交易在5月25日星期四美国东部时间大约在美国东部时间上午10:58进行。

A second, even larger transaction of around 1,754,893.45 USDT followed at around 3:17 PM ET on Thursday. Together, these two transactions add up to a staggering 2,598,060.29 USDT lost.

周四下午3:17左右，第二次甚至更大的交易约为1,754,893.45 USDT。这两项交易在一起，加起来达到了惊人的2,598,060.29 USDT。

ScamSniffer flagged the activity due to the repetition of such large transfers between the same two addresses in a short timeframe. This is behavior often seen in address spoofing incidents, where scammers create fake addresses that closely mimic legitimate ones, or in cases of mistaken fund redirection due to copy-paste errors from tainted transaction histories.

由于在短时间内相同两个地址之间的重复转移，因此Scamsniffer标记了这项活动。这是在地址欺骗事件中经常看到的行为，在该事件中，诈骗者创建的伪造地址非常模仿合法的地址，或者由于污染交易历史记录的副本误差而导致的基金重定向错误。

The sender is reportedly the same individual who previously lost $840,000 in a separate spam-related address manipulation incident. This history makes the current loss even more tragic and highlights the persistent nature of these attack vectors.

据报道，发件人是同一个人，以前在另一起与垃圾邮件相关的地址操作事件中损失了840,000美元。这一历史使当前的损失更加悲惨，并突出了这些攻击向量的持续性。

According to the publicly available transaction records, a total of twelve separate USDT movements were logged between the sender’s and the recipient’s wallet. Most of these prior movements involved zero-value transactions.

根据公开可用的交易记录，在发件人和收件人的钱包之间，总共记录了十二个单独的USDT动作。这些先前的运动中的大多数涉及零值交易。

These zero-value transfers are often used by scammers to “poison” a user’s transaction history with look-alike addresses, hoping the user will accidentally copy the fake address for a future, larger transaction. The appearance of such probing transfers in this wallet’s history adds further weight to suspicions of ongoing malicious activity targeting the victim

这些零价值转移通常被骗子使用，用相似地址“毒化”用户的交易历史记录，希望用户意外地将假地址复制为未来的，更大的交易。在这个钱包的历史中，这种探测转移的外观增加了对受害者的持续恶意活动的怀疑

The second large, loss-making transaction was reported to have occurred just 11 minutes before ScamSniffer identified and flagged the suspicious activity. The earlier, smaller (but still substantial) transfer was made about four hours before that. ScamSniffer noted that the wallet’s interaction history likely played a crucial role in this costly error, with the victim potentially copying the fake address from their prior transfer logs, a common pitfall for users not meticulously verifying recipient addresses.

据报道，第二大大型损失交易发生在骗局识别并标记可疑活动的仅11分钟之前。在此之前大约四个小时，较早的较小（但仍然很大）的转移是进行的。 Scamsniffer指出，钱包的互动历史可能在这一昂贵的错误中起着至关重要的作用，受害者可能会从先前的转移日志中复制假地址，这是对用户的常见陷阱，对于未经精心验证的接收者地址而言。

No smart contract interactions or known service provider engagements were linked to the recipient wallet that received the nearly $2.6 million in USDT. The absence of any external transaction metadata strongly increases the likelihood that these USDT transfers were not part of any legitimate service or payment but were instead directly sent to an address controlled by a scammer or an attacker exploiting a user error.

没有智能合同互动或已知的服务提供商的参与与收到近260万美元的收件钱包有关。没有任何外部交易元数据很大程度上增加了这些USDT转移不属于任何合法服务或付款的可能性，而是直接发送到由骗子控制的地址或利用用户错误的攻击者控制的地址。