以太坊（ETH）研究人員賈斯汀·德雷克（Justin Drake）重新開放了有關區塊鏈安全框架的辯論

以太坊基金會的研究人員和合併建築師賈斯汀·德雷克（Justin Drake）通過定義以太坊和比特幣之間的一些鮮明對比來重新開放有關區塊鏈安全框架的辯論。

Ethereum (ETH) researcher and Merge architect Justin Drake has reignited the debate on blockchain security frameworks by highlighting some key differences between Bitcoin and Ethereum.

以太坊（ETH）研究人員和合併建築師賈斯汀·德雷克（Justin Drake）通過突出比特幣和以太坊之間的一些關鍵差異來重新點燃了關於區塊鏈安全框架的辯論。

In his latest post, Drake puts the price of launching a 51% attack on Bitcoin as low as $10 billion as the asset’s block reward and security fund gradually decrease.

德雷克（Drake）在他的最新帖子中將對比特幣發動51％攻擊的價格低至100億美元，而資產的獎勵和安全基金逐漸減少。

His words refer to an inherent long-term weakness in Bitcoin’s dependence on Proof-of-Work, which calls for sustained miner incentives diminishing by each halving. In contrast, Ether’s transition to PoS via the Merge altered its defensive posture altogether.

他的話是指比特幣對工作證明的固有的長期弱點，這要求持續的礦工激勵措施減少，每次減少。相反，以太通過合併向POS的過渡完全改變了其防禦姿勢。

Having well over $44.8 billion currently staked, to compromise Ether someone would need to acquire and risk it all. The attacker would also be subjected to asset devaluation and possible slashings, so the effort would be much more costly and less feasible.

目前擁有超過448億美元的資金超過448億美元，以損害某人需要獲取和冒險的以太。攻擊者還將遭受資產貶值和可能的削減，因此，努力將更加昂貴和可行。

The debate has been heightened on Ether’s future and resilience after the post by Chainlink’s community liaison, Zach Rynes.

Chainlink的社區聯絡員Zach Rynes的帖子之後，關於Ether的未來和韌性加劇了辯論。

He implied that Ethereum has difficulty in being a sound monetary asset like Bitcoin, providing superior execution compared to Solana, and having superior data availability in comparison to platforms such as Celestia.

他暗示，以太坊很難成為像比特幣這樣的聲音貨幣資產，與Solana相比，可提供優越的執行，並且與Celestia等平台相比，具有較高的數據可用性。

“Ethereum is fighting a war on three fronts and not really winning any of them currently – ETH is not a better SoV commodity money than BTC (fight me)– Ethereum L1 execution layer is not more scalable than Solana or alt L1s– Ethereum blobspace is not more scalable than Arpo and Celestia,” said Rynes.

“以太坊正在在三個方面進行戰爭，目前並沒有真正贏得任何戰爭 - ETH並不比BTC（戰鬥我）更好的是SOV商品的錢 - 以太坊L1執行層並不比Solana或Alt L1S更可擴展 - Ethereum Blobspace並不比Arpo和Celestia更可擴展性，” Rynes說。

Rynes’s outlook provoked Drake to respond to these arguments, averring that Ethereum’s approach is not about winning small battles but about becoming an all-encompassing infrastructure layer like the internet itself.

瑞恩斯（Rynes）的前景激發了德雷克（Drake）對這些論點的回應，平均認為以太坊的方法不是要贏得小型戰鬥，而是要成為像互聯網本身這樣的無所不包的基礎設施層。

Rather than being best at one thing, Ether is establishing itself as the infrastructure for real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, stablecoins, and settlement of the kind used by institutions.

以太並非一方面是最好的，而是將自己確立為現實世界中的基礎架構（RWA）令牌化，穩定的和定居於機構使用的基礎架構。

A Platform vs. an Asset

平台與資產

Drake’s post was an explicit challenge to common narratives portraying Ethereum as unfocused or overambitious. He thinks that Ethereum is moving beyond simply being a blockchain, likening its ecosystem to foundational technologies such as Windows or the internet.

德雷克（Drake）的帖子是對將以太坊（以太坊（Ethereum））描繪成不專心或過度雄心勃勃的普通敘事的明確挑戰。他認為，以太坊正在不僅僅是一個區塊鏈，將其生態系統比作基礎技術，例如Windows或Internet。

In his view, Ethereum’s strength is derived from maturity in the network, decentralization, and security, attributes appealing to the traditional finance institutions looking forward to a trustworthy infrastructure for tokenization.

在他看來，以太坊的力量來自網絡中的成熟，權力下放和安全性，這些屬性吸引了傳統的金融機構，期待著值得信賴的代幣化基礎設施。

As the crypto landscape continues to develop, the chasm between platform versatility and asset purity widens. Ethereum, in Drake’s view, is the sole asset that can fulfill the requirements of an international decentralized financial system.

隨著加密景觀的不斷發展，平台多功能性和資產純度之間的鴻溝擴大。德雷克認為，以太坊是可以滿足國際分散金融體係要求的唯一資產。