以太坊（ETH）研究人员贾斯汀·德雷克（Justin Drake）重新开放了有关区块链安全框架的辩论

以太坊基金会的研究人员和合并建筑师贾斯汀·德雷克（Justin Drake）通过定义以太坊和比特币之间的一些鲜明对比来重新开放有关区块链安全框架的辩论。

Ethereum (ETH) researcher and Merge architect Justin Drake has reignited the debate on blockchain security frameworks by highlighting some key differences between Bitcoin and Ethereum.

以太坊（ETH）研究人员和合并建筑师贾斯汀·德雷克（Justin Drake）通过突出比特币和以太坊之间的一些关键差异来重新点燃了关于区块链安全框架的辩论。

In his latest post, Drake puts the price of launching a 51% attack on Bitcoin as low as $10 billion as the asset’s block reward and security fund gradually decrease.

德雷克（Drake）在他的最新帖子中将对比特币发动51％攻击的价格低至100亿美元，而资产的奖励和安全基金逐渐减少。

His words refer to an inherent long-term weakness in Bitcoin’s dependence on Proof-of-Work, which calls for sustained miner incentives diminishing by each halving. In contrast, Ether’s transition to PoS via the Merge altered its defensive posture altogether.

他的话是指比特币对工作证明的固有的长期弱点，这要求持续的矿工激励措施减少，每次减少。相反，以太通过合并向POS的过渡完全改变了其防御姿势。

Having well over $44.8 billion currently staked, to compromise Ether someone would need to acquire and risk it all. The attacker would also be subjected to asset devaluation and possible slashings, so the effort would be much more costly and less feasible.

目前拥有超过448亿美元的资金超过448亿美元，以损害某人需要获取和冒险的以太。攻击者还将遭受资产贬值和可能的削减，因此，努力将更加昂贵和可行。

The debate has been heightened on Ether’s future and resilience after the post by Chainlink’s community liaison, Zach Rynes.

Chainlink的社区联络员Zach Rynes的帖子之后，关于Ether的未来和韧性加剧了辩论。

He implied that Ethereum has difficulty in being a sound monetary asset like Bitcoin, providing superior execution compared to Solana, and having superior data availability in comparison to platforms such as Celestia.

他暗示，以太坊很难成为像比特币这样的声音货币资产，与Solana相比，可提供优越的执行，并且与Celestia等平台相比，具有较高的数据可用性。

“Ethereum is fighting a war on three fronts and not really winning any of them currently – ETH is not a better SoV commodity money than BTC (fight me)– Ethereum L1 execution layer is not more scalable than Solana or alt L1s– Ethereum blobspace is not more scalable than Arpo and Celestia,” said Rynes.

“以太坊正在在三个方面进行战争，目前并没有真正赢得任何战争 - ETH并不比BTC（战斗我）更好的是SOV商品的钱 - 以太坊L1执行层并不比Solana或Alt L1S更可扩展 - Ethereum Blobspace并不比Arpo和Celestia更可扩展性，” Rynes说。

Rynes’s outlook provoked Drake to respond to these arguments, averring that Ethereum’s approach is not about winning small battles but about becoming an all-encompassing infrastructure layer like the internet itself.

瑞恩斯（Rynes）的前景激发了德雷克（Drake）对这些论点的回应，平均认为以太坊的方法不是要赢得小型战斗，而是要成为像互联网本身这样的无所不包的基础设施层。

Rather than being best at one thing, Ether is establishing itself as the infrastructure for real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, stablecoins, and settlement of the kind used by institutions.

以太并非一方面是最好的，而是将自己确立为现实世界中的基础架构（RWA）令牌化，稳定的和定居于机构使用的基础架构。

A Platform vs. an Asset

平台与资产

Drake’s post was an explicit challenge to common narratives portraying Ethereum as unfocused or overambitious. He thinks that Ethereum is moving beyond simply being a blockchain, likening its ecosystem to foundational technologies such as Windows or the internet.

德雷克（Drake）的帖子是对将以太坊（以太坊（Ethereum））描绘成不专心或过度雄心勃勃的普通叙事的明确挑战。他认为，以太坊正在不仅仅是一个区块链，将其生态系统比作基础技术，例如Windows或Internet。

In his view, Ethereum’s strength is derived from maturity in the network, decentralization, and security, attributes appealing to the traditional finance institutions looking forward to a trustworthy infrastructure for tokenization.

在他看来，以太坊的力量来自网络中的成熟，权力下放和安全性，这些属性吸引了传统的金融机构，期待着值得信赖的代币化基础设施。

As the crypto landscape continues to develop, the chasm between platform versatility and asset purity widens. Ethereum, in Drake’s view, is the sole asset that can fulfill the requirements of an international decentralized financial system.

随着加密景观的不断发展，平台多功能性和资产纯度之间的鸿沟扩大。德雷克认为，以太坊是可以满足国际分散金融体系要求的唯一资产。