關於比特幣的OP_Return的辯論加熱

作為最受歡迎的節點軟件的比特幣核心的開發人員表示，他們計劃在下一個版本中完全廢除OP_RETURN。

The debate over Bitcoin's OP_RETURN is heating up, with developers of Bitcoin Core - the most popular node software - planning to scrap the OP_RETURN limit altogether in the next release.

關於比特幣的OP_Return的辯論正在加熱，比特幣核心的開發人員（最受歡迎的節點軟件）計劃在下一個版本中完全廢除OP_Return限制。

The OP_RETURN limit is an 80-byte cap on the amount of arbitrary data that can be embedded in a Bitcoin transaction using a special, unspendable output field.

OP_RETURN限制是一個80字節的限制，該限額可以使用特殊的，不可投入的輸出字段將可以嵌入比特幣事務中的任意數據量。

Announcing the removal on Github, Core contributor and Engineer at Blockstream Greg Sanders, known as 'instagibbs,' said that large-data inscriptions are already happening and can be done in more or less abusive ways. According to him, the cap merely channels them into more opaque forms that cause damage to the network.

Blockstream Greg Sanders（稱為“ Instagibbs”）的核心貢獻者和工程師Github上宣布刪除，說大型數據已經發生了，可以或多或少地以虐待方式進行。據他說，帽子僅將它們引導成更不透明的形式，從而造成網絡損害。

The discussion centered on whether lifting the 80-byte OP_RETURN limit promotes transparency and simplifies data use on Bitcoin, or if it opens the door to abuse, spam, and a shift away from Bitcoin's financial focus.

討論集中在舉起80字節OP_RETURN限制是否會促進透明度並簡化對比特幣的數據使用，還是它打開了濫用，垃圾郵件和從比特幣的財務重點轉移的大門。

On Github, Sanders maintained that the constraint on the OP_RETURN size has ultimately led to more awkward workarounds. He explained that to put more data in transactions, users have been forced to embed it in fake public keys or spendable scripts, which are less efficient and create a messier UTXO set. He highlighted that removing the limit yields at least two tangible benefits: a cleaner UTXO set and more consistent default behavior.

在Github上，桑德斯堅持認為，對OP_Return尺寸的限制最終導致了更尷尬的解決方法。他解釋說，要將更多數據放入交易中，用戶被迫將其嵌入虛假的公共鑰匙或可支出的腳本中，這些腳本效率較低，並創建一個更混亂的UTXO集。他強調說，刪除極限至少產生了兩個切實的好處：更清潔的UTXO集和更一致的默認行為。

However, not everyone shares this view. Core developer Luke Dashjr, a staunch critic of inscriptions and data storage in general, which he deems spam, expressed his disapproval, stating that this change was "utter insanity."

但是，並不是每個人都分享這種觀點。核心開發人員盧克·達什吉（Luke Dashjr）是對銘文和數據存儲的堅定評論家，他認為垃圾郵件表示不贊成，他說這一變化是“完全瘋狂的”。

Amidst the ongoing controversy surrounding inscriptions and the planned changes to Bitcoin Core, an interesting development has unfolded with Bitcoin Knots, maintained by former Core developer Luke Dashjr, seeing a surge in adoption, now claiming approximately 5% share of all nodes.

在圍繞銘文和比特幣核心的計劃變化的持續爭議中，由前核心開發商盧克·達什吉（Luke Dashjr）維持的比特幣結的發展發展，現在看到了收養的激增，現在聲稱所有節點中約有5％的份額。

Bitcoin Knots, a more customizable fork of Bitcoin Core, is appealing to users who wish to have greater control over what their nodes relay or store, enabling them to reject non-payment transactions such as inscriptions.

比特幣結是比特幣核心的更可定制的叉子，它吸引了那些希望對其節點中繼或存儲的用戶更具控制權，從而使他們能夠拒絕諸如銘文之類的非付款交易。

Moreover, some prominent thought leaders in the industry, like Samson Mow, are urging node operators not to upgrade their version of Bitcoin Core or to use Knots instead.

此外，像Samson Mow這樣的行業中一些著名的思想領導者敦促節點操作員不要升級其比特幣核心版本或使用結。

Bitcoin Core is planning to remove the OP_RETURN limit in their next release. Many users find this to be an undesirable change for a number of reasons. You can refuse to upgrade and stay on 29.0 or run another implementation like @BitcoinKnots.

比特幣核心計劃在下一個版本中刪除OP_Return限制。許多用戶發現這是一個不希望的更改，原因有很多。您可以拒絕升級並保持29.0或運行其他實現@bitcoinknots。

Sanders defended the removal of the cap as aligned with Bitcoin's ethos: minimal, transparent rules.

桑德斯（Sanders）捍衛了與比特幣的精神一致的帽子的去除：最小，透明的規則。

"By retiring a deterrent that no longer deters, Bitcoin Core lets the fee market arbitrate competing demands and the minimal commonality of the coins’ program puts less stress on implementations to maintain compatibility with each other or with maximal coins."

“通過退休的威懾力量不再阻止，比特幣核心使收費市場可以仲裁競爭要求，而硬幣計劃的最小通用性則減少了對實施的壓力，以保持彼此之間的兼容性或與最大硬幣的兼容性。”

But that isn't bringing much consensus.

但這並沒有帶來太多共識。

"This marks a fundamental shift in the direction of Bitcoin. It's no longer an economic chain but rather a general-purpose programmable chain. I believe this changes the character of the network in a way that will ultimately be disastrous," one commenter warned on GitHub.

一位評論員警告說：“這標誌著比特幣方向的根本轉變。它不再是一個經濟鏈，而是一條通用的可編程鏈。我相信這最終會災難性地改變網絡的性質。”

"I want to be on the record saying that this is the largest mistake Core can make at this juncture. We're losing the economic focus and pivoting to a general-purpose programmable chain at the worst possible time."

“我想記錄在記錄的情況下，這是核心在這個關頭可能犯的最大錯誤。我們在最糟糕的時間失去了經濟重點，並將其轉向通用的可編程鏈。”