关于比特币的OP_Return的辩论加热

作为最受欢迎的节点软件的比特币核心的开发人员表示，他们计划在下一个版本中完全废除OP_RETURN。

The debate over Bitcoin's OP_RETURN is heating up, with developers of Bitcoin Core - the most popular node software - planning to scrap the OP_RETURN limit altogether in the next release.

关于比特币的OP_Return的辩论正在加热，比特币核心的开发人员（最受欢迎的节点软件）计划在下一个版本中完全废除OP_Return限制。

The OP_RETURN limit is an 80-byte cap on the amount of arbitrary data that can be embedded in a Bitcoin transaction using a special, unspendable output field.

OP_RETURN限制是一个80字节的限制，该限额可以使用特殊的，不可投入的输出字段将可以嵌入比特币事务中的任意数据量。

Announcing the removal on Github, Core contributor and Engineer at Blockstream Greg Sanders, known as 'instagibbs,' said that large-data inscriptions are already happening and can be done in more or less abusive ways. According to him, the cap merely channels them into more opaque forms that cause damage to the network.

Blockstream Greg Sanders（称为“ Instagibbs”）的核心贡献者和工程师Github上宣布删除，说大型数据已经发生了，可以或多或少地以虐待方式进行。据他说，帽子仅将它们引导成更不透明的形式，从而造成网络损害。

The discussion centered on whether lifting the 80-byte OP_RETURN limit promotes transparency and simplifies data use on Bitcoin, or if it opens the door to abuse, spam, and a shift away from Bitcoin's financial focus.

讨论集中在举起80字节OP_RETURN限制是否会促进透明度并简化对比特币的数据使用，还是它打开了滥用，垃圾邮件和从比特币的财务重点转移的大门。

On Github, Sanders maintained that the constraint on the OP_RETURN size has ultimately led to more awkward workarounds. He explained that to put more data in transactions, users have been forced to embed it in fake public keys or spendable scripts, which are less efficient and create a messier UTXO set. He highlighted that removing the limit yields at least two tangible benefits: a cleaner UTXO set and more consistent default behavior.

在Github上，桑德斯坚持认为，对OP_Return尺寸的限制最终导致了更尴尬的解决方法。他解释说，要将更多数据放入交易中，用户被迫将其嵌入虚假的公共钥匙或可支出的脚本中，这些脚本效率较低，并创建一个更混乱的UTXO集。他强调说，删除极限至少产生了两个切实的好处：更清洁的UTXO集和更一致的默认行为。

However, not everyone shares this view. Core developer Luke Dashjr, a staunch critic of inscriptions and data storage in general, which he deems spam, expressed his disapproval, stating that this change was "utter insanity."

但是，并不是每个人都分享这种观点。核心开发人员卢克·达什吉（Luke Dashjr）是对铭文和数据存储的坚定评论家，他认为垃圾邮件表示不赞成，他说这一变化是“完全疯狂的”。

Amidst the ongoing controversy surrounding inscriptions and the planned changes to Bitcoin Core, an interesting development has unfolded with Bitcoin Knots, maintained by former Core developer Luke Dashjr, seeing a surge in adoption, now claiming approximately 5% share of all nodes.

在围绕铭文和比特币核心的计划变化的持续争议中，由前核心开发商卢克·达什吉（Luke Dashjr）维持的比特币结的发展发展，现在看到了收养的激增，现在声称所有节点中约有5％的份额。

Bitcoin Knots, a more customizable fork of Bitcoin Core, is appealing to users who wish to have greater control over what their nodes relay or store, enabling them to reject non-payment transactions such as inscriptions.

比特币结是比特币核心的更可定制的叉子，它吸引了那些希望对其节点中继或存储的用户更具控制权，从而使他们能够拒绝诸如铭文之类的非付款交易。

Moreover, some prominent thought leaders in the industry, like Samson Mow, are urging node operators not to upgrade their version of Bitcoin Core or to use Knots instead.

此外，像Samson Mow这样的行业中一些著名的思想领导者敦促节点操作员不要升级其比特币核心版本或使用结。

Bitcoin Core is planning to remove the OP_RETURN limit in their next release. Many users find this to be an undesirable change for a number of reasons. You can refuse to upgrade and stay on 29.0 or run another implementation like @BitcoinKnots.

比特币核心计划在下一个版本中删除OP_Return限制。许多用户发现这是一个不希望的更改，原因有很多。您可以拒绝升级并保持29.0或运行其他实现@bitcoinknots。

Sanders defended the removal of the cap as aligned with Bitcoin's ethos: minimal, transparent rules.

桑德斯（Sanders）捍卫了与比特币的精神一致的帽子的去除：最小，透明的规则。

"By retiring a deterrent that no longer deters, Bitcoin Core lets the fee market arbitrate competing demands and the minimal commonality of the coins’ program puts less stress on implementations to maintain compatibility with each other or with maximal coins."

“通过退休的威慑力量不再阻止，比特币核心使收费市场可以仲裁竞争要求，而硬币计划的最小通用性则减少了对实施的压力，以保持彼此之间的兼容性或与最大硬币的兼容性。”

But that isn't bringing much consensus.

但这并没有带来太多共识。

"This marks a fundamental shift in the direction of Bitcoin. It's no longer an economic chain but rather a general-purpose programmable chain. I believe this changes the character of the network in a way that will ultimately be disastrous," one commenter warned on GitHub.

一位评论员警告说：“这标志着比特币方向的根本转变。它不再是一个经济链，而是一条通用的可编程链。我相信这最终会灾难性地改变网络的性质。”

"I want to be on the record saying that this is the largest mistake Core can make at this juncture. We're losing the economic focus and pivoting to a general-purpose programmable chain at the worst possible time."

“我想记录在记录的情况下，这是核心在这个关头可能犯的最大错误。我们在最糟糕的时间失去了经济重点，并将其转向通用的可编程链。”