BJP MP Manan Kumar Mishra连续第七次当选BCI主席

法律和正义并不完全相同，因此对于那些失去案件的人来说，什么是不公正的，将为获奖者伸张正义。

Law and justice are not identical, so what is injustice for those who have lost a case will mean justice for the winners. This became obvious when a lawyer from the Jamshedpur District Bar Association, Sudhir Kumar Pappu, voiced concern over senior advocate Manan Kumar Mishra’s ability to do justice to dual roles—as a Rajya Sabha MP and as chairman of the Bar Council of India (BCI). The BCI is the regulatory body for advocates throughout India and frames rules for advocates and senior advocates who are practising.

法律和正义并不完全相同，因此对于那些失去案件的人来说，什么是不公正的，将为获奖者伸张正义。当Jamshedpur地区律师协会的律师Sudhir Kumar Pappu对高级倡导者Manan Kumar Mishra担任双重角色的能力（作为Rajya Sabha MP和印度律师委员会（BCI）主席）表示关注。 BCI是整个印度倡导者的监管机构，也是正在执业的倡导者和高级拥护者的框架规则。

It is among the four most influential organisations regulating advocates in the country. The others are the Supreme Court Bar Association, the Supreme Court Advocates on Record (AoR) Association, in which advocates who have cleared the tough AoR examination must register, and the Bombay Bar Association.

它是该国规范倡导者的四个最具影响力的组织之一。其他是最高法院律师协会，最高法院的倡导者（AOR）协会，在该协会中，清除严格的AOR考试必须注册的倡导者以及孟买律师协会。

Manan Kumar Mishra was elected unopposed as the BCI chairman for the seventh consecutive time. He is also a BJP Rajya Sabha MP from Bihar. Ipso facto, this senior advocate is both a politician and practices law. This raises the question of whether a politician who is busy with party politics can simultaneously practice law, as both are full-time professions. There are a few persons who have passed their MBBS and also their LL.B degrees but cannot practice both medicine and law simultaneously. If a doctor who has passed his LL.B cannot practice law, there is no reason why a Rajya Sabha MP should head the BCI.

曼南·库马尔·米什拉（Manan Kumar Mishra）连续第七次被当选为BCI主席。他还是比哈尔邦的BJP Rajya Sabha MP。事实上，这位高级倡导者既是政治家，又是法律。这就提出了一个问题，即一个忙于政党政治的政治家是否可以同时执行法律，因为两者都是全职专业。有几个人通过了MBB和LL.B学位，但不能同时执行医学和法律。如果通过LL.B的医生无法执行法律，那么没有理由为什么Rajya Sabha MP应该领导BCI。

Similarly, there are chartered accountants who have passed their LL.B but are not allowed to simultaneously practice law and accountancy. A company secretary who is on the rolls of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India with an LL.B degree cannot practice as a company secretary and an advocate simultaneously.

同样，有一些特许会计师通过了LL.B，但不允许同时执业法律和会计。由LL.B学位的公司秘书研究所担任公司秘书研究所的公司秘书不能同时担任公司秘书和倡导者。

Being an MP or an MLA is a full-time profession. MPs of the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha have to strictly adhere to the party whip, while the role of the BCI chairman demands a neutral stance to regulate lawyers' conduct and uphold standards and ethics within the legal profession. “Holding dual positions of the BCI chairman while being a BJP MP in the Rajya Sabha compromises integrity and professional ethics,” Pappu declared.

成为国会议员或MLA是全职职业。 Lok Sabha或Rajya Sabha的国会议员必须严格遵守党派的鞭子，而BCI主席的角色要求中立立场来规范律师的行为，并维护法律职业内的标准和道德。帕普宣称：“担任BCI主席的双重职务是Rajya Sabha的BJP议员，妥协了诚信和职业道德。”

The Modi government’s proposal to amend the Advocates Act evoked protests across India. Lawyers strongly opposed the draft bill, voicing fears it would curtail the independence and autonomy of lawyers. The government was forced to withdraw this proposal following these pan-India protests. The government sent the draft bill to an expert committee for review.

莫迪政府修改《倡导者法》的提议唤起了印度的抗议活动。律师强烈反对法案草案，表达了担心，这会削弱律师的独立性和自治权。在这些泛印度抗议活动之后，政府被迫撤回该提议。政府将法案草案发送给专家委员会进行审查。

Notwithstanding these developments, the BCI chairman publicly supported the Act, stating its passage was his priority. Pappu raised a question as to how the BCI chairman could guarantee the existing draft would not be notified as a law which would be detrimental to lawyers.

尽管有这些事态发展，BCI主席公开支持该法案，并指出其通过是他的首要任务。 Pappu提出了一个问题，即BCI主席如何保证不会将现有草稿通知为有害律师的法律。

If one analyses all these aspects, it becomes obvious that Mishra’s role as a BJP MP of the Rajya Sabha ensures he will support the laws passed by the government, irrespective of whether lawyers support or oppose them. When a bill is presented in Parliament, Mishra will be duty-bound to obey the party whip, thereby compromising his duty towards all lawyers in the country. If he defies the party whip, he has to resign.

如果一个人分析了所有这些方面，那么很明显，米什拉（Mishra）作为Rajya Sabha的BJP MP的角色确保他将支持政府通过的法律，而不论律师是支持还是反对他们。当议会提出一项法案时，米什拉（Mishra）将有责任服从党派鞭子，从而损害他对该国所有律师的义务。如果他反对党的鞭子，他必须辞职。

Just as Goa was supposed to have enacted the Journalists’ Protection Act, which was withdrawn, the long-pending Advocate Protection Act, which was to have been introduced in the Rajya Sabha as a private bill, has been kept in cold storage. Pappu asked why Mishra had not used his influence as a Rajya Sabha MP to secure a budget provision of Rs 5000 crore for the welfare of advocates throughout the country.

正如果阿本来应该颁布了《记者保护法》，该法案被撤回一样，这是一项长期以来的倡导者保护法，该法案是在拉贾·萨卜哈（Rajya Sabha）作为私人法案中引入的，也一直保存在冷藏中。帕普问为什么米什拉（Mishra）为什么没有将自己的影响力用作Rajya Sabha MP，以确保全国倡导者福利为500亿卢比的预算规定。

Emphasising the need for an undivided commitment, Pappu urged Mishra to step down from the BCI chairmanship if he wishes to continue as a Rajya Sabha MP from the BJP. “Manan Kumar Mishra is engaged in active politics in favour of the BJP. It would be best for him to remain a Rajya Sabha MP and resign from the post of BCI chairman to avoid conflicts of interest,” he asserted.

帕普强调需要做出的承诺，敦促米什拉敦促米什拉（Mishra）辞去BCI主席，如果他希望继续担任BJP的Rajya Sabha MP。他断言：“曼南·库马尔·米什拉（Manan Kumar Mishra）从事积极的政治，以支持人民党。最好是他成为拉吉亚·萨卜哈（Rajya Sabha）国会议员，并辞去BCI董事长的职务，以避免利益冲突。”

The chairman of the BCI must be a role model for young advocates, who enrol in the state bar councils. Unlike mathematics, law is a nebulous subject. It keeps changing with changing governments because each political party professes a different ideology. The chairman of the BCI is elected, not selected, unlike the advocates general of each of the 25 states, who resign along with the chief ministers because they occupy office at the pleasure of the chief minister.

BCI主席必须是参加州律师委员会的年轻倡导者的榜样。与数学不同，法律是一个模糊的主题。随着政府的变化，它不断变化，因为每个政党都自称是不同的意识形态。 BCI主席被选为25个州中每个州的拥护者，他们与首席部长一起辞职，因为他们以首席部长的欢迎而辞去了职务。

That the law can be interpreted in different ways is proved by the fact that a former high court judge, Pushpa Ganediwala, was forced to resign after she was demoted as a district and sessions judge on February 12, 2022, due to her controversial verdicts. She ruled the accused had to have “skin-to-skin” contact with a minor with sexual intent to constitute an offence under the POCSO Act. After an uproar all over the country, the 47th CJI, Shar

前高等法院法官普什帕·加尼迪瓦拉（Pushpa Ganediwala）在2022年2月12日被裁员后，由于她有争议的判决，他被迫辞职，这是由前高等法院法官普什帕·加尼迪瓦拉（Pushpa Ganediwala）被迫辞职的事实证明，这一事实证明了法律，这是可以用不同的方式来证明，该法律可以用不同的方式来证明，这一事实证明了法律。她裁定，被告必须与未成年人的性意图“皮肤”接触，以构成POCSO法案。在全国各地的骚动之后，第47 CJI，Shar