凤凰城集团的新区块链绩效数据表明，Internet计算机（ICP）和Toncoin（Ton）（TON）在2025年4月获得了每秒最高的平均交易，超过了所有其他网络。

这些数字提供了一个详细的看法，说明如何响应不断增长的用户活动和应用需求，并在吞吐量能力中出现了明显的差异。

New blockchain performance data from Phoenix Group has revealed that Internet Computer (ICP) and Toncoin (TON) achieved the highest average transactions per second (TPS) in April 2025.

凤凰城集团的新区块链绩效数据显示，互联网计算机（ICP）和Toncoin（Ton）（TON）在2025年4月的平均每秒达到了最高的平均交易。

The figures provide a detailed view of how leading blockchains are scaling in response to growing user activity and application demand, with clear disparities emerging in throughput capabilities.

这些数字提供了一个详细的看法，说明如何响应不断增长的用户活动和应用需求，并在吞吐量能力中出现了明显的差异。

Fastest #Chains By Average TPS In The Last Month

上个月最快的＃链TPS的平均链

The post Fastest Blockchains In April 2025: ICP, TON Lead In TPS, Active Addresses Hit New Highs appeared first on Benzinga.

邮政最快的区块链在2025年4月：ICP，TP的领先地位，主动地址命中了新高，首先出现在Benzinga上。

Also Read: Best Cryptocurrency To Invest In 2025

另请阅读：2025年投资的最佳加密货币

According to the data, ICP led all networks with an average TPS of 4,800. TON followed closely with 4,300 TPS. These results place both blockchains well above their competitors regarding transaction throughput. The report attributes part of this efficiency to rapid block times: ICP averaged 480 milliseconds per block, while TON completed blocks in just 390 milliseconds.

根据数据，ICP的平均TPS为4,800。吨紧随其后的是4,300 tps。这些结果将两个区块链都远远超过其竞争对手的交易吞吐量。该报告将该效率的一部分归因于快速块时间：ICP平均每块480毫秒，而TON仅以390毫秒为单位完成了块。

Equally, the results showed a high level of user engagement in the TON case. This brought its active address count to 13.7 million in April, the highest among all the tracked blockchains. Solana, for instance, has 3 million active addresses, which is unsurprising as it barely makes it to the TPS list.

同样，结果表明，在TON情况下，用户参与度很高。这使其活跃的地址数量在4月达到1370万，这是所有追踪区块链中最高的。例如，索拉纳（Solana）有300万个活动地址，这并不奇怪，因为它几乎没有进入TPS列表。

The high speed and activity levels on TON and ICP suggest that these networks are handling large-scale operations with consistency, likely enabled by optimized consensus protocols and infrastructure.

TON和ICP上的高速和活动水平表明，这些网络正在处理具有一致性的大规模操作，这可能是通过优化的共识协议和基础架构来实现的。

Significant Drop In Mid-Tier Performance

大幅下降表现

The TPS results indicated that the performing blockchains were at the top, while the remaining blockchains ranked below the top two. Regarding AATP, Solana performed the third best with 95.8 TPS, Near Protocol was second with 81.7 TPS, and Avalanche was third with 70.4 TPS. Both these networks have been trading in the decentralized application development and smart contract platforms, but their throughput indicates a huge disparity in the transaction rates.

TPS的结果表明，执行区块链在顶部，而其余区块链排名最多。关于AATP，Solana以95.8 TP的成绩排名第三，近协议以81.7 TPS排名第二，而Avalanche则以70.4 TPS排名第三。这两个网络都在分散的应用程序开发和智能合约平台上进行了交易，但是它们的吞吐量表明交易率存在巨大差异。

Sui took second place in this regard, with a transaction per second ratio of 66.6, followed by Polygon, with a TPS of 50.4, and Arbitrum, with a TPS of 46.6. Both support multiple decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3 environments; however, the data indicate that they are not even close to ICP and TON in terms of the number of transactions per second.

SUI在这方面排名第二，每秒的交易比率为66.6，其次是Polygon，TPS为50.4，TOINM，TPS为46.6。两者都支持多个分散的财务（DEFI）和Web3环境；但是，数据表明，就每秒交易数量而言，它们甚至不接近ICP和TON。

Notably, Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH), the second-largest blockchain by market capitalization, has a TPS of only 3.5. This puts it considerably lower in the speed stakes than newer competitors. The penalty highlights that Ethereum continues to cope with its throughput bottleneck while moving toward scaling solutions like rollups.

值得注意的是，按市值计算的第二大区块链以太坊（Crypto：ETH）的TPS仅为3.5。这比新竞争对手要低得多。惩罚强调，以太坊继续应对其吞吐量瓶颈，同时朝着滚动等缩放解决方案前进。

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC), similarly, was among the lowest-ranked networks, with a reported TPS of 4.7. Though widely used as a store of value, its basic transaction throughput lags behind chains optimized for speed.

同样，比特币（加密：BTC）是排名最低的网络之一，报告的TPS为4.7。尽管广泛用作价值存储，但其基本交易吞吐量滞后在链条后面优化了速度。

Tron, BNB Chain, and Cardano also posted moderate TPS values, suggesting a more balanced trade-off between speed, security, and decentralization. While these chains did not experience a performance improvement metric enough to make the top ten list, they are still involved in other network developments.

Tron，BNB链和Cardano还发布了中等的TPS值，这表明速度，安全性和权力下放之间的权衡更加平衡。尽管这些连锁店的性能改进度量不足以列出前十名，但它们仍参与其他网络开发。

The data available at Phoenix Group also entailed parameters other than TPS. Average block time and active addresses gave better insights into each network’s activity. These indicators indicate that TPS is a crucial causal indicator, but does not exist in isolation. Incorporating perspectives from TON and Solan, respectively, high-speed block times and active users put clamps on end-to-end speed across blockchain systems.

Phoenix Group的数据还需要参数以外的其他参数。平均块时间和主动地址可以更好地了解每个网络的活动。这些指标表明TPS是一个至关重要的因果指标，但不存在孤立的。分别结合了Ton和Solan的观点，即高速块时间，活跃的用户将夹具置于区块链系统的端到端速度上。