鳳凰城集團的新區塊鏈績效數據表明，Internet計算機（ICP）和Toncoin（Ton）（TON）在2025年4月獲得了每秒最高的平均交易，超過了所有其他網絡。

這些數字提供了一個詳細的看法，說明如何響應不斷增長的用戶活動和應用需求，並在吞吐量能力中出現了明顯的差異。

New blockchain performance data from Phoenix Group has revealed that Internet Computer (ICP) and Toncoin (TON) achieved the highest average transactions per second (TPS) in April 2025.

鳳凰城集團的新區塊鏈績效數據顯示，互聯網計算機（ICP）和Toncoin（Ton）（TON）在2025年4月的平均每秒達到了最高的平均交易。

The figures provide a detailed view of how leading blockchains are scaling in response to growing user activity and application demand, with clear disparities emerging in throughput capabilities.

這些數字提供了一個詳細的看法，說明如何響應不斷增長的用戶活動和應用需求，並在吞吐量能力中出現了明顯的差異。

Fastest #Chains By Average TPS In The Last Month

上個月最快的＃鏈TPS的平均鏈

The post Fastest Blockchains In April 2025: ICP, TON Lead In TPS, Active Addresses Hit New Highs appeared first on Benzinga.

郵政最快的區塊鏈在2025年4月：ICP，TP的領先地位，主動地址命中了新高，首先出現在Benzinga上。

Also Read: Best Cryptocurrency To Invest In 2025

另請閱讀：2025年投資的最佳加密貨幣

According to the data, ICP led all networks with an average TPS of 4,800. TON followed closely with 4,300 TPS. These results place both blockchains well above their competitors regarding transaction throughput. The report attributes part of this efficiency to rapid block times: ICP averaged 480 milliseconds per block, while TON completed blocks in just 390 milliseconds.

根據數據，ICP的平均TPS為4,800。噸緊隨其後的是4,300 tps。這些結果將兩個區塊鏈都遠遠超過其競爭對手的交易吞吐量。該報告將該效率的一部分歸因於快速塊時間：ICP平均每塊480毫秒，而TON僅以390毫秒為單位完成了塊。

Equally, the results showed a high level of user engagement in the TON case. This brought its active address count to 13.7 million in April, the highest among all the tracked blockchains. Solana, for instance, has 3 million active addresses, which is unsurprising as it barely makes it to the TPS list.

同樣，結果表明，在TON情況下，用戶參與度很高。這使其活躍的地址數量在4月達到1370萬，這是所有追踪區塊鏈中最高的。例如，索拉納（Solana）有300萬個活動地址，這並不奇怪，因為它幾乎沒有進入TPS列表。

The high speed and activity levels on TON and ICP suggest that these networks are handling large-scale operations with consistency, likely enabled by optimized consensus protocols and infrastructure.

TON和ICP上的高速和活動水平表明，這些網絡正在處理具有一致性的大規模操作，這可能是通過優化的共識協議和基礎架構來實現的。

Significant Drop In Mid-Tier Performance

大幅下降表現

The TPS results indicated that the performing blockchains were at the top, while the remaining blockchains ranked below the top two. Regarding AATP, Solana performed the third best with 95.8 TPS, Near Protocol was second with 81.7 TPS, and Avalanche was third with 70.4 TPS. Both these networks have been trading in the decentralized application development and smart contract platforms, but their throughput indicates a huge disparity in the transaction rates.

TPS的結果表明，執行區塊鏈在頂部，而其餘區塊鏈排名最多。關於AATP，Solana以95.8 TP的成績排名第三，近協議以81.7 TPS排名第二，而Avalanche則以70.4 TPS排名第三。這兩個網絡都在分散的應用程序開發和智能合約平台上進行了交易，但是它們的吞吐量表明交易率存在巨大差異。

Sui took second place in this regard, with a transaction per second ratio of 66.6, followed by Polygon, with a TPS of 50.4, and Arbitrum, with a TPS of 46.6. Both support multiple decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3 environments; however, the data indicate that they are not even close to ICP and TON in terms of the number of transactions per second.

SUI在這方面排名第二，每秒的交易比率為66.6，其次是Polygon，TPS為50.4，TOINM，TPS為46.6。兩者都支持多個分散的財務（DEFI）和Web3環境；但是，數據表明，就每秒交易數量而言，它們甚至不接近ICP和TON。

Notably, Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH), the second-largest blockchain by market capitalization, has a TPS of only 3.5. This puts it considerably lower in the speed stakes than newer competitors. The penalty highlights that Ethereum continues to cope with its throughput bottleneck while moving toward scaling solutions like rollups.

值得注意的是，按市值計算的第二大區塊鏈以太坊（Crypto：ETH）的TPS僅為3.5。這比新競爭對手要低得多。懲罰強調，以太坊繼續應對其吞吐量瓶頸，同時朝著滾動等縮放解決方案前進。

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC), similarly, was among the lowest-ranked networks, with a reported TPS of 4.7. Though widely used as a store of value, its basic transaction throughput lags behind chains optimized for speed.

同樣，比特幣（加密：BTC）是排名最低的網絡之一，報告的TPS為4.7。儘管廣泛用作價值存儲，但其基本交易吞吐量滯後在鏈條後面優化了速度。

Tron, BNB Chain, and Cardano also posted moderate TPS values, suggesting a more balanced trade-off between speed, security, and decentralization. While these chains did not experience a performance improvement metric enough to make the top ten list, they are still involved in other network developments.

Tron，BNB鍊和Cardano還發布了中等的TPS值，這表明速度，安全性和權力下放之間的權衡更加平衡。儘管這些連鎖店的性能改進度量不足以列出前十名，但它們仍參與其他網絡開發。

The data available at Phoenix Group also entailed parameters other than TPS. Average block time and active addresses gave better insights into each network’s activity. These indicators indicate that TPS is a crucial causal indicator, but does not exist in isolation. Incorporating perspectives from TON and Solan, respectively, high-speed block times and active users put clamps on end-to-end speed across blockchain systems.

Phoenix Group的數據還需要參數以外的其他參數。平均塊時間和主動地址可以更好地了解每個網絡的活動。這些指標表明TPS是一個至關重要的因果指標，但不存在孤立的。分別結合了Ton和Solan的觀點，即高速塊時間，活躍的用戶將夾具置於區塊鏈系統的端到端速度上。