Zelenskyy's Suit Saga：Polymarket爭議解釋了

加密預測市場正面臨著Zelenskyy是否穿西裝的賭注。這是Polymarket，Zelenskyy和爭議的低點。

The crypto prediction market Polymarket is currently embroiled in a controversy involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and... a suit. Yes, you read that right. Millions of dollars are at stake over whether Zelenskyy sported formal attire at a NATO summit. Buckle up, because this is a wild ride.

Crypto預測市場Polymarket目前捲入了涉及烏克蘭總統沃迪米爾·澤倫斯基（Volodymyr Zelenskyy）和...訴訟的爭議。是的，您讀了正確的。 Zelenskyy是否在北約峰會上穿著正式服裝，數百萬美元受到威脅。係好，因為這是一次狂野的旅程。

The $160 Million Bet: Suit or No Suit?

耗資1.6億美元的賭注：西裝還是沒有西裝？

Polymarket, a platform where users can bet on future events, opened a market asking if Zelenskyy would wear a suit before July. The event that sparked the most debate was the NATO summit on June 24th. Did Zelenskyy's dark jacket and pants combo constitute a suit? That's where the drama began.

Polymarket是一個平台，用戶可以在未來的活動上下注，詢問Zelenskyy是否會在7月之前穿西裝。引發辯論最多的活動是6月24日舉行的北約峰會。 Zelenskyy的深色外套和褲子組合是否構成了西裝？那是戲劇開始的地方。

UMA Validators Under Fire

UMA驗證器

The initial ruling leaned towards “yes,” but UMA, the oracle protocol responsible for resolving the market, decided against it. This decision sent the price of the “yes” token plummeting, triggering accusations of vote manipulation. Users are crying foul, suggesting that large token holders (

最初的裁決傾向於“是”，但是負責解決市場的甲骨文協議烏瑪（Uma）決定反對。該決定發出了“是”代幣的價格下降，引發了投票操縱的指控。用戶哭泣的犯規，表明大型令牌持有人（