市值: $2.6472T 2.57%
成交额(24h): $140.6462B -22.03%
  • 市值: $2.6472T 2.57%
  • 成交额(24h): $140.6462B -22.03%
  • 恐惧与贪婪指数:
  • 市值: $2.6472T 2.57%
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
热门新闻
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
bitcoin
bitcoin

$87959.907984 USD

1.34%

ethereum
ethereum

$2920.497338 USD

3.04%

tether
tether

$0.999775 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.237324 USD

8.12%

bnb
bnb

$860.243768 USD

0.90%

solana
solana

$138.089498 USD

5.43%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999807 USD

0.01%

tron
tron

$0.272801 USD

-1.53%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.150904 USD

2.96%

cardano
cardano

$0.421635 USD

1.97%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$32.152445 USD

2.23%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$533.301069 USD

-1.94%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.953417 USD

2.68%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.535951 USD

0.73%

zcash
zcash

$521.483386 USD

-2.87%

加密货币新闻

Zelenskyy's Suit Saga:Polymarket争议解释了

2025/07/08 03:38

加密预测市场正面临着Zelenskyy是否穿西装的赌注。这是Polymarket,Zelenskyy和争议的低点。

Zelenskyy's Suit Saga:Polymarket争议解释了

The crypto prediction market Polymarket is currently embroiled in a controversy involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and... a suit. Yes, you read that right. Millions of dollars are at stake over whether Zelenskyy sported formal attire at a NATO summit. Buckle up, because this is a wild ride.

Crypto预测市场Polymarket目前卷入了涉及乌克兰总统沃迪米尔·泽伦斯基(Volodymyr Zelenskyy)和...诉讼的争议。是的,您读了正确的。 Zelenskyy是否在北约峰会上穿着正式服装,数百万美元受到威胁。系好,因为这是一次狂野的旅程。

The $160 Million Bet: Suit or No Suit?

耗资1.6亿美元的赌注:西装还是没有西装?

Polymarket, a platform where users can bet on future events, opened a market asking if Zelenskyy would wear a suit before July. The event that sparked the most debate was the NATO summit on June 24th. Did Zelenskyy's dark jacket and pants combo constitute a suit? That's where the drama began.

Polymarket是一个平台,用户可以在未来的活动上下注,询问Zelenskyy是否会在7月之前穿西装。引发辩论最多的活动是6月24日举行的北约峰会。 Zelenskyy的深色外套和裤子组合是否构成了西装?那是戏剧开始的地方。

UMA Validators Under Fire

UMA验证器

The initial ruling leaned towards “yes,” but UMA, the oracle protocol responsible for resolving the market, decided against it. This decision sent the price of the “yes” token plummeting, triggering accusations of vote manipulation. Users are crying foul, suggesting that large token holders (

最初的裁决倾向于“是”,但是负责解决市场的甲骨文协议乌玛(Uma)决定反对。该决定发出了“是”代币的价格下降,引发了投票操纵的指控。用户哭泣的犯规,表明大型令牌持有人(

原文来源:coingape

免责声明:info@kdj.com

所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!

如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。

2026年02月03日 发表的其他文章