XRP對比特幣最大主義者皮埃爾·羅查德（Pierre Rochard）的歷史不幸片段做出回應

在數字資產不斷發展的景觀中，看到倡導不同加密貨幣的社區之間充滿激情的辯論並不少見。

In the ever-evolving landscape of digital assets, it’s not uncommon to see spirited debates between communities advocating for different cryptocurrencies. But sometimes, what begins as a technical discussion devolves into tribalism. This is exactly what prompted the latest rebuttal from the All Things XRP community, following a post by Bitcoin advocate Pierre Rochard, who referenced an early quirk in XRP Ledger’s history as a subtle dig at its legitimacy.

在數字資產不斷發展的景觀中，看到倡導不同加密貨幣的社區之間充滿激情的辯論並不少見。但是有時候，從技術討論開始發展為部落主義。這正是XRP社區的最新反駁的原因，在比特幣倡導者Pierre Rochard發表的帖子之後，他在XRP Ledger的歷史上提到了早期的怪癖，以此作為其合法性的微妙挖掘。

In a tweet captioned simply “Sir,” Rochard highlighted a snippet from the XRP Ledger documentation explaining that due to a mishap in the ledger’s early days, the first 32,569 ledgers were lost. As a result, ledger #32,570 is the earliest available on record. The post went on to explain that a reset to index zero would have caused significant disruption, so ledger #32,570 was adopted as the de facto “genesis” ledger.

羅查德（Rochard）在一條文字中簡單地標題為“先生”，重點介紹了XRP Ledger文檔中的片段，解釋說，由於Ledger早期的不幸，前32,569個Ledgers丟失了。結果，LEDGER＃32,570是記錄中最早可用的。該帖子繼續解釋說，重置零指數將造成重大破壞，因此，Ledger＃32,570被用作事實上的“ Genesis”分類帳。

While factually accurate, the underlying tone of Rochard’s post struck a nerve with many XRP supporters, who saw it not as a technical insight but as yet another veiled jab from the Bitcoin maximalist camp. In response, All Things XRP delivered a powerful and eloquent rebuttal, emphasizing unity, pragmatism, and the need to move past the toxic tribalism that has held the broader crypto community back for far too long.

儘管實際上是準確的，但羅查德（Rochard）帖子的基本語氣與許多XRP支持者感到神經，他們認為這不是技術洞察力，而是一個來自比特幣最大化陣營的刺戳。作為回應，所有事物XRP提供了強大而雄辯的反駁，強調了統一，實用主義，並需要超越有毒的部落主義，這使更廣泛的加密貨幣社區恢復了很長時間。

Beyond Tribalism: Crypto Isn’t a Zero-Sum Game

超越部落主義：加密不是零和遊戲

The All Things XRP response opens with an important reminder: this space is big enough for everyone. Surrounding one project doesn’t have to mean another. Many XRP supporters, including those responding to Rochard, have cheered for Bitcoin’s success from the beginning. Not because they think XRP should be subordinated, but because they see how Bitcoin’s rise lifts the entire industry. A healthy, growing Bitcoin often signals robust investor confidence in crypto as a whole.

XRP響應的所有內容都以一個重要的提醒開頭：這個空間對每個人都足夠大。圍繞一個項目並不意味著另一個項目。許多XRP支持者，包括對Rochard做出回應的支持者，從一開始就為比特幣的成功而歡呼。不是因為他們認為XRP應該服從服從，而是因為他們看到了比特幣的崛起如何提升整個行業。一個健康，增長的比特幣通常表示投資者對整個加密貨幣的信心。

🚨⚠️ A RESPONSE TO BITCOIN MAXIS ATTACKING XRP.

🚨⚠️對比特幣Maxis攻擊XRP的回應。

I’m all for healthy debate in crypto, but the constant attacks on XRP from folks like @BitcoinPierre need addressing.

我全都參加了Crypto中的健康辯論，但是@bitcoinpierre需要解決的人們對XRP的不斷攻擊。

I’m rooting for Bitcoin to win. Always have. Why? Because a rising tide lifts all boats. Crypto isn’t a zero-sum… pic.twitter.com.

我正在為比特幣贏得勝利。總是有。為什麼？因為上升的潮汐會抬起所有船。加密不是零和零……pic.twitter.com。

However, the frequent and often unwarranted attacks on XRP from staunch Bitcoin supporters suggest a different perspective—one rooted in a zero-sum mentality. This scarcity mindset proposes that only one chain can thrive in the long run. Not only is that idea fundamentally flawed, but it’s also dangerous. It inhibits innovation and distracts from the real mission of the crypto movement: building decentralized technologies that solve real-world problems.

但是，堅定的比特幣支持者對XRP的頻繁且經常不必要的攻擊表明了不同的觀點 - 一種植根於零和心態。這種稀缺的思維方式提出，從長遠來看，只有一條鏈才能蓬勃發展。這個想法從根本上是有缺陷的，而且也很危險。它抑制了創新，並分散了加密運動的真正使命：建立解決現實世界問題的分散技術。

No Chain Is Without Flaws

沒有鏈條沒有缺陷

The All Things XRP rebuttal does not shy away from acknowledging XRP Ledger’s early history. Yes, there was a mishap, and yes, the first week’s worth of ledger data is no longer available. But is that reason enough to dismiss the entire project? If historical mishaps disqualify legitimacy, then Bitcoin, too, should be coming under scrutiny.

XRP反駁的所有事情並沒有迴避承認XRP Ledger的早期歷史。是的，有一個不幸，是的，不再可用的第一周的分類帳數據。但是這個原因足以駁斥整個項目嗎？如果歷史上的不幸取消合法性，那麼比特幣也應受到審查。

Take, for instance, Bitcoin’s infamous overflow bug in 2010. Due to a coding error, over 184 billion BTC were minted in a single transaction—an amount massively exceeding Bitcoin’s stiplated total supply cap of 21 million. The bug was quickly patched by members of the community, but it serves as a poignant reminder that no blockchain, no matter how venerated, is perfect. Mistakes happen. What matters is how communities respond and build resilient systems going forward.

以比特幣在2010年的臭名昭著的溢出錯誤為例。由於編碼錯誤，一筆交易中鑄造了超過1.84億BTC，這一數量巨大的數量超過了比特幣的支撐總供應上限，為2100萬。該錯誤是由社區成員迅速修補的，但它是一個令人難以置信的提醒，即無論是多麼尊敬，都沒有區塊鍊是完美的。錯誤發生。重要的是社區如何響應和建立彈性系統。

XRP has done just that. Despite its early ledger loss, the network operates smoothly today, with all states accurately recorded across versions. Its throughput and resilience are well-documented, and its design is robust enough to serve real-world applications, processing billions of dollars in cross-border payments and enterprise-level transactions globally. It’s a story of adaptation, not failure.

XRP就是這樣做的。儘管該網絡早期丟失了，但今天的網絡運行順利，所有州都跨版本準確記錄。它的吞吐量和彈性有充分的文獻記錄，其設計足以為現實世界中的應用提供，處理數十億美元的跨境支付以及全球企業級交易。這是一個適應的故事，而不是失敗。

Real-World Adoption Speaks Louder Than Spam Campaigns

現實世界的採用勝於垃圾郵件廣告系列

Another point of emphasis from the All Things XRP community is XRP’s undeniable traction in institutional circles. Ripple, the leading company building on the XRP Ledger, has forged partnerships with hundreds of financial institutions around the world. Their infrastructure powers a large volume of cross-border payments, remittances, and liquidity provisioning, especially in regions where traditional banking systems are slow or expensive.

XRP社區的另一個重點是XRP在製度界的不可否認的牽引力。 XRP Ledger上領先的公司大樓Ripple與全球數百家金融機構建立了合作夥伴關係。他們的基礎設施為大量的跨境支付，匯款和流動性提供有助於，尤其是在傳統銀行系統緩慢或昂貴的地區。

It’s easy to mock from the sidelines, but the figures speak for themselves. While critics post sarcastic tweets, Ripple continues to ship products and expand its reach. That’s the essence of technological progress: delivering working code, not just commentary.

從場邊嘲笑很容易，但是這些人物自言自語。當評論家發布諷刺推文時，Ripple繼續運送產品並擴大其影響力。這就是技術進步的本質：提供工作代碼，而不僅僅是評論。

Focus on What Unites, Not What Divides

專注於團結什麼，而不是分裂

Ultimately, the All Things XRP response calls for a redirection of energy. Instead of perpetuating cycles of ridicule and one-upmanship, the crypto space would benefit far more from collaborative efforts and mutual respect. There’s a vast field of opportunity still to be explored. Layer-1s and layer-2s alike are pushing

最終，XRP響應的所有事物都需要重定向能量。加密貨幣空間不再是嘲笑和單一技巧的循環，而是從協作努力和相互尊重中受益更多。仍然有很多機會領域要探索。第1層和第2層都在推