XRP对比特币最大主义者皮埃尔·罗查德（Pierre Rochard）的历史不幸片段做出回应

在数字资产不断发展的景观中，看到倡导不同加密货币的社区之间充满激情的辩论并不少见。

In the ever-evolving landscape of digital assets, it’s not uncommon to see spirited debates between communities advocating for different cryptocurrencies. But sometimes, what begins as a technical discussion devolves into tribalism. This is exactly what prompted the latest rebuttal from the All Things XRP community, following a post by Bitcoin advocate Pierre Rochard, who referenced an early quirk in XRP Ledger’s history as a subtle dig at its legitimacy.

在数字资产不断发展的景观中，看到倡导不同加密货币的社区之间充满激情的辩论并不少见。但是有时候，从技术讨论开始发展为部落主义。这正是XRP社区的最新反驳的原因，在比特币倡导者Pierre Rochard发表的帖子之后，他在XRP Ledger的历史上提到了早期的怪癖，以此作为其合法性的微妙挖掘。

In a tweet captioned simply “Sir,” Rochard highlighted a snippet from the XRP Ledger documentation explaining that due to a mishap in the ledger’s early days, the first 32,569 ledgers were lost. As a result, ledger #32,570 is the earliest available on record. The post went on to explain that a reset to index zero would have caused significant disruption, so ledger #32,570 was adopted as the de facto “genesis” ledger.

罗查德（Rochard）在一条文字中简单地标题为“先生”，重点介绍了XRP Ledger文档中的片段，解释说，由于Ledger早期的不幸，前32,569个Ledgers丢失了。结果，LEDGER＃32,570是记录中最早可用的。该帖子继续解释说，重置零指数将造成重大破坏，因此，Ledger＃32,570被用作事实上的“ Genesis”分类帐。

While factually accurate, the underlying tone of Rochard’s post struck a nerve with many XRP supporters, who saw it not as a technical insight but as yet another veiled jab from the Bitcoin maximalist camp. In response, All Things XRP delivered a powerful and eloquent rebuttal, emphasizing unity, pragmatism, and the need to move past the toxic tribalism that has held the broader crypto community back for far too long.

尽管实际上是准确的，但罗查德（Rochard）帖子的基本语气与许多XRP支持者感到神经，他们认为这不是技术洞察力，而是一个来自比特币最大化阵营的刺戳。作为回应，所有事物XRP提供了强大而雄辩的反驳，强调了统一，实用主义，并需要超越有毒的部落主义，这使更广泛的加密货币社区恢复了很长时间。

Beyond Tribalism: Crypto Isn’t a Zero-Sum Game

超越部落主义：加密不是零和游戏

The All Things XRP response opens with an important reminder: this space is big enough for everyone. Surrounding one project doesn’t have to mean another. Many XRP supporters, including those responding to Rochard, have cheered for Bitcoin’s success from the beginning. Not because they think XRP should be subordinated, but because they see how Bitcoin’s rise lifts the entire industry. A healthy, growing Bitcoin often signals robust investor confidence in crypto as a whole.

XRP响应的所有内容都以一个重要的提醒开头：这个空间对每个人都足够大。围绕一个项目并不意味着另一个项目。许多XRP支持者，包括对Rochard做出回应的支持者，从一开始就为比特币的成功而欢呼。不是因为他们认为XRP应该服从服从，而是因为他们看到了比特币的崛起如何提升整个行业。一个健康，增长的比特币通常表示投资者对整个加密货币的信心。

🚨⚠️ A RESPONSE TO BITCOIN MAXIS ATTACKING XRP.

🚨⚠️对比特币Maxis攻击XRP的回应。

I’m all for healthy debate in crypto, but the constant attacks on XRP from folks like @BitcoinPierre need addressing.

我全都参加了Crypto中的健康辩论，但是@bitcoinpierre需要解决的人们对XRP的不断攻击。

I’m rooting for Bitcoin to win. Always have. Why? Because a rising tide lifts all boats. Crypto isn’t a zero-sum… pic.twitter.com.

我正在为比特币赢得胜利。总是有。为什么？因为上升的潮汐会抬起所有船。加密不是零和零……pic.twitter.com。

However, the frequent and often unwarranted attacks on XRP from staunch Bitcoin supporters suggest a different perspective—one rooted in a zero-sum mentality. This scarcity mindset proposes that only one chain can thrive in the long run. Not only is that idea fundamentally flawed, but it’s also dangerous. It inhibits innovation and distracts from the real mission of the crypto movement: building decentralized technologies that solve real-world problems.

但是，坚定的比特币支持者对XRP的频繁且经常不必要的攻击表明了不同的观点 - 一种植根于零和心态。这种稀缺的思维方式提出，从长远来看，只有一条链才能蓬勃发展。这个想法从根本上是有缺陷的，而且也很危险。它抑制了创新，并分散了加密运动的真正使命：建立解决现实世界问题的分散技术。

No Chain Is Without Flaws

没有链条没有缺陷

The All Things XRP rebuttal does not shy away from acknowledging XRP Ledger’s early history. Yes, there was a mishap, and yes, the first week’s worth of ledger data is no longer available. But is that reason enough to dismiss the entire project? If historical mishaps disqualify legitimacy, then Bitcoin, too, should be coming under scrutiny.

XRP反驳的所有事情并没有回避承认XRP Ledger的早期历史。是的，有一个不幸，是的，不再可用的第一周的分类帐数据。但是这个原因足以驳斥整个项目吗？如果历史上的不幸取消合法性，那么比特币也应受到审查。

Take, for instance, Bitcoin’s infamous overflow bug in 2010. Due to a coding error, over 184 billion BTC were minted in a single transaction—an amount massively exceeding Bitcoin’s stiplated total supply cap of 21 million. The bug was quickly patched by members of the community, but it serves as a poignant reminder that no blockchain, no matter how venerated, is perfect. Mistakes happen. What matters is how communities respond and build resilient systems going forward.

以比特币在2010年的臭名昭著的溢出错误为例。由于编码错误，一笔交易中铸造了超过1.84亿BTC，这一数量巨大的数量超过了比特币的支撑总供应上限，为2100万。该错误是由社区成员迅速修补的，但它是一个令人难以置信的提醒，即无论是多么尊敬，都没有区块链是完美的。错误发生。重要的是社区如何响应和建立弹性系统。

XRP has done just that. Despite its early ledger loss, the network operates smoothly today, with all states accurately recorded across versions. Its throughput and resilience are well-documented, and its design is robust enough to serve real-world applications, processing billions of dollars in cross-border payments and enterprise-level transactions globally. It’s a story of adaptation, not failure.

XRP就是这样做的。尽管该网络早期丢失了，但今天的网络运行顺利，所有州都跨版本准确记录。它的吞吐量和弹性有充分的文献记录，其设计足以为现实世界中的应用提供，处理数十亿美元的跨境支付以及全球企业级交易。这是一个适应的故事，而不是失败。

Real-World Adoption Speaks Louder Than Spam Campaigns

现实世界的采用胜于垃圾邮件广告系列

Another point of emphasis from the All Things XRP community is XRP’s undeniable traction in institutional circles. Ripple, the leading company building on the XRP Ledger, has forged partnerships with hundreds of financial institutions around the world. Their infrastructure powers a large volume of cross-border payments, remittances, and liquidity provisioning, especially in regions where traditional banking systems are slow or expensive.

XRP社区的另一个重点是XRP在制度界的不可否认的牵引力。 XRP Ledger上领先的公司大楼Ripple与全球数百家金融机构建立了合作伙伴关系。他们的基础设施为大量的跨境支付，汇款和流动性提供有助于，尤其是在传统银行系统缓慢或昂贵的地区。

It’s easy to mock from the sidelines, but the figures speak for themselves. While critics post sarcastic tweets, Ripple continues to ship products and expand its reach. That’s the essence of technological progress: delivering working code, not just commentary.

从场边嘲笑很容易，但是这些人物自言自语。当评论家发布讽刺推文时，Ripple继续运送产品并扩大其影响力。这就是技术进步的本质：提供工作代码，而不仅仅是评论。

Focus on What Unites, Not What Divides

专注于团结什么，而不是分裂

Ultimately, the All Things XRP response calls for a redirection of energy. Instead of perpetuating cycles of ridicule and one-upmanship, the crypto space would benefit far more from collaborative efforts and mutual respect. There’s a vast field of opportunity still to be explored. Layer-1s and layer-2s alike are pushing

最终，XRP响应的所有事物都需要重定向能量。加密货币空间不再是嘲笑和单一技巧的循环，而是从协作努力和相互尊重中受益更多。仍然有很多机会领域要探索。第1层和第2层都在推