![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
探索對加密貨幣中的模因出處的價值,突出了自己的總督($ dog)和互聯網文化局($ nfd)等項目。
In a sea of AI-generated noise and endless token launches, one might wonder: where's the culture? Memetic provenance, the verifiable origin and history of internet culture, is an undervalued primitive in the crypto space, offering authenticity and legitimacy that's often overlooked.
在AI生成的噪音和無盡的代幣發射中,人們可能會想知道:文化在哪裡?模因出處是互聯網文化的可驗證起源和歷史,是加密貨幣領域被低估的原始性,提供了經常被忽視的真實性和合法性。
The Curious Case of Doge and Provenance
Doge和Doge的奇怪案例
Back in June 2021, Atsuko Sato, the owner of Kabosu (aka, the Doge meme), auctioned off a Doge NFT for a cool $4.2 million. This NFT was then fractionalized into $DOG tokens, giving birth to Own The Doge (OTD). Fast forward to today, and legendary trader GCR regrets not buying the original Kabosu NFT, calling it potentially “the most valuable asset in crypto.” He later bought the original Dogwifhat meme for $4 million. This highlights the inherent, yet often ignored, value of memetic provenance.
早在2021年6月,Kabosu(又名Doge Meme)的所有者Atsuko Sato拍賣了Doge NFT,價格為420萬美元。然後將此NFT分為$ dog dog令牌,從而生下了Doge(OTD)。快進到今天,傳奇交易者GCR感到遺憾的是沒有購買原始的Kabosu NFT,稱其為“加密貨幣中最有價值的資產”。後來,他以400萬美元的價格購買了原始的Dogwifhat Meme。這突出了模因出處的固有但經常被忽略的價值。
Provenance vs. IP: What's the Diff?
出處與IP:差異是什麼?
In crypto, 'provenance' and 'intellectual property' (IP) get tossed around like hot potatoes. But they're not the same thing. Provenance is all about the origin and history of a digital artifact—who created it, when it was minted, and how it's been passed around. It’s verifiable on-chain. IP, on the other hand, is legal and off-chain. Think copyrights and trademarks.
在加密中,“出處”和“知識產權”(IP)像熱土豆一樣被扔掉。但是他們不是同一回事。出處是關於數字文物的起源和歷史 - 誰在鑄造時創建了它以及如何通過。它是可驗證的鏈。另一方面,IP是合法和鏈接的。認為版權和商標。
Undervalued Primitives: $DOG and $NFD
被低估的原語:$ dog和$ nfd
Despite the incredible story and cultural significance, projects like Own The Doge ($DOG) and Bureau of Internet Culture ($NFD) remain surprisingly underappreciated. In a market flooded with fleeting trends, these assets offer something real: verifiable provenance, IP backing, and genuine cultural clout. Why aren't they commanding premium valuations?
儘管故事具有令人難以置信的故事和文化意義,但諸如Ourd The Doge($ DOG)和Internet文化局($ nfd)之類的項目令人驚訝地被低估了。在充滿短暫趨勢的市場中,這些資產提供了真實的東西:可驗證的出處,IP支持和真正的文化影響力。他們為什麼不指揮高級估值?
Qubetics, Render, and Polkadot: A Tangent Worth Taking
碼頭,渲染和polkadot:值得服用的切線
While we're on the topic of undervalued assets, let's quickly pivot. As the crypto landscape shifts towards utility, projects like Qubetics (with its multi-chain wallet), Render (decentralized GPU rendering), and Polkadot (interoperable blockchains) are stepping into the spotlight. They're not memes, but they *are* solving real-world problems, adding another layer to the "what's valuable?" conversation.
當我們談到被低估的資產的話題時,讓我們快速求合。隨著加密景觀向實用程序轉移,諸如Qubetics(帶有多鏈錢包),渲染(分散的GPU渲染)和Polkadot(可互操作的區塊鏈)之類的項目逐漸升入了人們的焦點。它們不是模因,但是他們 *正在解決現實世界中的問題,在“什麼有價值的東西”中添加了另一層。對話。
Final Thoughts: Memes, Dreams, and Crypto Things
最終想法:模因,夢想和加密貨幣
So, what's the takeaway? In the wild world of crypto, don't underestimate the power of a good meme, especially one with verifiable provenance. While everyone's chasing the next shiny object, maybe it's time to take a closer look at the cultural artifacts that have already captured our hearts and minds. Who knows, the next Doge might just be around the corner. Keep it classy, crypto kids!
那麼,收穫是什麼?在加密世界的野生世界中,不要低估一個好模因的力量,尤其是具有可驗證的出處的模因。當每個人都在追逐下一個閃亮的物體時,也許是時候仔細研究已經吸引了我們心靈的文化偽像了。誰知道,下一位大門可能只是在拐角處。保持優雅,加密孩子們!
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- 比特幣,黑客和印度儲備:加密雞尾酒
- 2025-06-27 15:10:12
- 從使用比特幣的黑客到印度考慮比特幣儲備,加密貨幣世界永遠不會睡覺。讓我們分解最新。
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 隨著收入的下降,比特幣礦工面臨支付壓力:深度潛水
- 2025-06-27 15:31:42
- 比特幣礦工會感到收入暴跌。我們探討了這種收入下降的因素以及對加密貨幣景觀意味著什麼。
-
- TRON(TRX)價格和費用調整:是什麼驅動了動態?
- 2025-06-27 15:31:42
- 看看Tron的TRX價格,費用調整和網絡活動。發現關鍵趨勢和洞察力推動TRX在加密貨幣市場上的表現。