XRP Price在Analisa Torres法官拒絕了Ripple-SEC訴訟中的雙方後5％墜毀

不久之後，XRP的市場情緒翻轉了看跌，因為SEC訴訟的解決方案可能會進一步推遲。

The price of XRP crashed 5% hours after Judge Analisa Torres denied both parties in the Ripple (CRYPTO: XRP)-SEC lawsuit, the request for an indicative ruling.

在Analisa Torres法官拒絕雙方（Crypto：XRP）-SEC訴訟中，XRP的價格墜毀了5％小時，要求進行指示性裁決。

The joint motion was aiming to modify Judge Torres's prior decision on dismissing the SEC's case but Judge Analisa stated that the parties’ joint motion for an "indicative ruling" is denied. Both parties would need to satisfy specific legal requirements and demonstrate that modifying her previous decision would serve the interests of both the public and institutional XRP buyers.

聯合動議的目的是修改托雷斯法官先前駁回SEC案件的決定，但Analisa法官表示，當事方對“指示性裁決”的聯合動議被否認。雙方都需要滿足特定的法律要求，並證明修改她以前的決定將符合公共和機構XRP買家的利益。

The judge's response to the parties' joint motion for an "indicative ruling" came as a surprise considering her final decision in the case, dismissing the SEC's case and ruling that XRP is not a security in the two relevant time periods.

考慮到她的最終決定，法官對當事方對“指示性裁決”的聯合動議的回應令人驚訝，駁回了SEC的案件，並裁定在兩個相關時期內XRP不是安全性。

The judge stated that the parties' joint motion was "improperly" filed with an attempt to cancel important parts of the final decision that had already been made in the case.

法官說，當事方的聯合動議“不當”提出，試圖取消該案已經做出的最終決定的重要部分。

After the Judge Analisa Torres rejected the joint motion in the Ripple SEC lawsuit and provided clear guidance for the next potential steps, experts and lawyers from the Ripple community shared their take on what lies ahead.

Analisa Torres法官拒絕了Ripple SEC訴訟中的聯合動議，並為下一步的潛在步驟提供了明確的指導後，來自Ripple社區的專家和律師分享了他們對未來的看法。

Crypto Legal Expert Shares Important Point on Judge Torres's Perspective

加密法律專家分享了托雷斯法官的觀點的重要一點

Among the legal experts who weighed in on the implications of Judge Analisa Torres's latest ruling, John Deaton, a prominent crypto lawyer, and founder of the DEATON AND GRANT, LLP firm, shared an interesting point on the perspective of the court.

在法律專家中，他們對Analisa Torres法官的最新裁決的影響，著名的加密律師約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）和LLP公司Deaton and Grant的創始人約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）在法院的觀點上分享了一個有趣的觀點。

In his analysis of the implications of Judge Analisa Torres's latest ruling, crypto legal expert John Deaton highlighted a crucial point.

加密法律專家約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）在分析了Analisa Torres法官最新裁決的含義時，強調了至關重要的觀點。

According to Deaton, Judge Analisa Torres's perspective is that the SEC has invested five years aggressively pursuing its legal strategy against Ripple, consuming “thousands of hours of legal and judicial manpower,” only to now suggest that much of this extensive effort was meaningless.

根據迪頓（Deaton）的說法，Analisa Torres法官的觀點是，SEC已經投資了五年，積極地追求其針對Ripple的法律戰略，消耗了“數千個小時的法律和司法人力”，但目前這表明，這種廣泛的努力毫無意義。

"The Court viewed the parties’ joint motion as an attempt to "undo" her final judgment, noting that her prior decision had already engaged "legal and economic firepower" and consumed "thousands of hours of manpower.”

“法院將當事方的聯合動議視為“取消”她的最終判決的一種企圖，並指出她先前的裁決已經與“法律和經濟火力”訂婚，並消耗了“數千小時的人力”。

Coming Together to Address Judge Torres’ Concerns

聚在一起談論托雷斯法官的關注

After the court decision, Sebastien Neretti, the CLO of Ripple, said that they would be working together with the SEC to address Judge Torres’ concerns.

法院裁決後，波紋的克洛塞巴斯蒂安·內雷蒂（Sebastien Neretti）表示，他們將與美國證券交易委員會（SEC）合作，向托雷斯法官的擔憂解決。

In a post on X, Neretti said that the judge had expressed concerns that the parties were trying to get out of two major penalties: the order to stop selling illegal securities and the requirement to pay the full fine.

內雷蒂（Neretti）在X上的一篇文章中說，法官表示擔心雙方試圖擺脫兩個主要處罰：停止出售非法證券的命令以及支付全部罰款的要求。

"This is about procedural concerns with the dismissal of Ripple’s cross-appeal. Both parties would need to satisfy specific legal requirements and demonstrate that modifying her prior decision would serve the interests of both the public and institutional XRP buyers, the judge said.

法官說：“這是關於駁回Ripple的交叉上訴的程序問題。雙方都需要滿足特定的法律要求，並證明修改她的先前決定將為公共和機構XRP買家的利益提供服務。

The judge’s response to the parties’ joint motion for an “indicative ruling” came as a surprise considering her final decision in the case, dismissing the SEC's case and ruling that XRP is not a security in the two relevant time periods.

考慮到她的最終決定，法官對當事方對“指示性裁決”的共同動議的回應令人驚訝，駁回了SEC的案件，並裁定在兩個相關時期內XRP不是安全性。

The judge stated that the parties’ joint motion was “improperly” filed with an attempt to cancel important parts of the final decision that had already been made in the case.

法官說，當事方的聯合動議“不當”，試圖取消該案已經做出的最終決定的重要部分。

After the Judge Analisa Torres rejected the joint motion in the Ripple SEC lawsuit and provided clear guidance for the next potential steps, experts and lawyers from the Ripple community shared their take on what lies ahead.

Analisa Torres法官拒絕了Ripple SEC訴訟中的聯合動議，並為下一步的潛在步驟提供了明確的指導後，來自Ripple社區的專家和律師分享了他們對未來的看法。

Crypto Legal Expert Shares Important Point on Judge Torres's Perspective

加密法律專家分享了托雷斯法官的觀點的重要一點

Among the legal experts who weighed in on the implications of Judge Analisa Torres' latest ruling, John Deaton, a prominent crypto lawyer, and founder of the DEATON AND GRANT, LLP firm, shared an interesting point on the perspective of the court.

在法律專家中，他們對Analisa Torres法官的最新裁決的影響，著名的加密律師約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）和有限責任公司Deaton and Grant的創始人約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）在法院的觀點上分享了一個有趣的觀點。

According to Deaton, Judge Analisa Torres's perspective is that the SEC has invested five years aggressively pursuing its legal strategy against Ripple, consuming “thousands of hours of legal and judicial manpower,” only to now suggest that much of this extensive effort was meaningless.

根據迪頓（Deaton）的說法，Analisa Torres法官的觀點是，SEC已經投資了五年，積極地追求其針對Ripple的法律戰略，消耗了“數千個小時的法律和司法人力”，但目前這表明，這種廣泛的努力毫無意義。

"The Court viewed the parties’ joint motion as an attempt to "undo" her final judgment, noting that her prior decision had already engaged "legal and economic firepower" and consumed "thousands of hours of manpower.”

“法院將當事方的聯合動議視為“取消”她的最終判決的一種企圖，並指出她先前的裁決已經與“法律和經濟火力”訂婚，並消耗了“數千小時的人力”。

Coming Together to Address Judge Torres’ Concerns

聚在一起談論托雷斯法官的關注

After the court decision, Sebastien Neretti, the CLO of Ripple, said that they would be coming together with the SEC to address Judge Torres’ concerns.

法院裁決後，波紋的克洛塞巴斯蒂安·內雷蒂（Sebastien Neretti）表示，他們將與SEC一起向托雷斯法官的擔憂講話。

In a message on the X platform, Neretti said that the judge had expressed concerns that the parties were trying to get out of two major penalties: the order to stop selling illegal securities and the requirement to pay the full fine.

Neretti在X平台上的一條消息中說，法官表示擔心當事方試圖擺脫兩個主要處罰：停止出售非法證券的命令以及支付全部罰款的要求。

Neretti said: "This is about procedural concerns with the dismissal of Ripple’s cross-appeal. Both parties would need to satisfy specific legal requirements and demonstrate that modifying her prior decision would serve the interests of both the public and institutional XRP buyers, the judge said.

Neretti說：“這是關於駁回Ripple的交叉上訴的程序問題。雙方都需要滿足特定的法律要求，並證明修改她的先前決定將符合公共和機構XRP買家的利益，法官說。

The judge’s response to the parties’ joint motion for an “indicative ruling” came

法官對當事方對“指示性裁決”的聯合動議的回應來了