XRP Price在Analisa Torres法官拒绝了Ripple-SEC诉讼中的双方后5％坠毁

不久之后，XRP的市场情绪翻转了看跌，因为SEC诉讼的解决方案可能会进一步推迟。

The price of XRP crashed 5% hours after Judge Analisa Torres denied both parties in the Ripple (CRYPTO: XRP)-SEC lawsuit, the request for an indicative ruling.

在Analisa Torres法官拒绝双方（Crypto：XRP）-SEC诉讼中，XRP的价格坠毁了5％小时，要求进行指示性裁决。

The joint motion was aiming to modify Judge Torres's prior decision on dismissing the SEC's case but Judge Analisa stated that the parties’ joint motion for an "indicative ruling" is denied. Both parties would need to satisfy specific legal requirements and demonstrate that modifying her previous decision would serve the interests of both the public and institutional XRP buyers.

联合动议的目的是修改托雷斯法官先前驳回SEC案件的决定，但Analisa法官表示，当事方对“指示性裁决”的联合动议被否认。双方都需要满足特定的法律要求，并证明修改她以前的决定将符合公共和机构XRP买家的利益。

The judge's response to the parties' joint motion for an "indicative ruling" came as a surprise considering her final decision in the case, dismissing the SEC's case and ruling that XRP is not a security in the two relevant time periods.

考虑到她的最终决定，法官对当事方对“指示性裁决”的联合动议的回应令人惊讶，驳回了SEC的案件，并裁定在两个相关时期内XRP不是安全性。

The judge stated that the parties' joint motion was "improperly" filed with an attempt to cancel important parts of the final decision that had already been made in the case.

法官说，当事方的联合动议“不当”提出，试图取消该案已经做出的最终决定的重要部分。

After the Judge Analisa Torres rejected the joint motion in the Ripple SEC lawsuit and provided clear guidance for the next potential steps, experts and lawyers from the Ripple community shared their take on what lies ahead.

Analisa Torres法官拒绝了Ripple SEC诉讼中的联合动议，并为下一步的潜在步骤提供了明确的指导后，来自Ripple社区的专家和律师分享了他们对未来的看法。

Crypto Legal Expert Shares Important Point on Judge Torres's Perspective

加密法律专家分享了托雷斯法官的观点的重要一点

Among the legal experts who weighed in on the implications of Judge Analisa Torres's latest ruling, John Deaton, a prominent crypto lawyer, and founder of the DEATON AND GRANT, LLP firm, shared an interesting point on the perspective of the court.

在法律专家中，他们对Analisa Torres法官的最新裁决的影响，著名的加密律师约翰·迪顿（John Deaton）和LLP公司Deaton and Grant的创始人约翰·迪顿（John Deaton）在法院的观点上分享了一个有趣的观点。

In his analysis of the implications of Judge Analisa Torres's latest ruling, crypto legal expert John Deaton highlighted a crucial point.

加密法律专家约翰·迪顿（John Deaton）在分析了Analisa Torres法官最新裁决的含义时，强调了至关重要的观点。

According to Deaton, Judge Analisa Torres's perspective is that the SEC has invested five years aggressively pursuing its legal strategy against Ripple, consuming “thousands of hours of legal and judicial manpower,” only to now suggest that much of this extensive effort was meaningless.

根据迪顿（Deaton）的说法，Analisa Torres法官的观点是，SEC已经投资了五年，积极地追求其针对Ripple的法律战略，消耗了“数千个小时的法律和司法人力”，但目前这表明，这种广泛的努力毫无意义。

"The Court viewed the parties’ joint motion as an attempt to "undo" her final judgment, noting that her prior decision had already engaged "legal and economic firepower" and consumed "thousands of hours of manpower.”

“法院将当事方的联合动议视为“取消”她的最终判决的一种企图，并指出她先前的裁决已经与“法律和经济火力”订婚，并消耗了“数千小时的人力”。

Coming Together to Address Judge Torres’ Concerns

聚在一起谈论托雷斯法官的关注

After the court decision, Sebastien Neretti, the CLO of Ripple, said that they would be working together with the SEC to address Judge Torres’ concerns.

法院裁决后，波纹的克洛塞巴斯蒂安·内雷蒂（Sebastien Neretti）表示，他们将与美国证券交易委员会（SEC）合作，向托雷斯法官的担忧解决。

In a post on X, Neretti said that the judge had expressed concerns that the parties were trying to get out of two major penalties: the order to stop selling illegal securities and the requirement to pay the full fine.

内雷蒂（Neretti）在X上的一篇文章中说，法官表示担心双方试图摆脱两个主要处罚：停止出售非法证券的命令以及支付全部罚款的要求。

"This is about procedural concerns with the dismissal of Ripple’s cross-appeal. Both parties would need to satisfy specific legal requirements and demonstrate that modifying her prior decision would serve the interests of both the public and institutional XRP buyers, the judge said.

法官说：“这是关于驳回Ripple的交叉上诉的程序问题。双方都需要满足特定的法律要求，并证明修改她的先前决定将为公共和机构XRP买家的利益提供服务。

The judge’s response to the parties’ joint motion for an “indicative ruling” came as a surprise considering her final decision in the case, dismissing the SEC's case and ruling that XRP is not a security in the two relevant time periods.

考虑到她的最终决定，法官对当事方对“指示性裁决”的共同动议的回应令人惊讶，驳回了SEC的案件，并裁定在两个相关时期内XRP不是安全性。

The judge stated that the parties’ joint motion was “improperly” filed with an attempt to cancel important parts of the final decision that had already been made in the case.

法官说，当事方的联合动议“不当”，试图取消该案已经做出的最终决定的重要部分。

After the Judge Analisa Torres rejected the joint motion in the Ripple SEC lawsuit and provided clear guidance for the next potential steps, experts and lawyers from the Ripple community shared their take on what lies ahead.

Analisa Torres法官拒绝了Ripple SEC诉讼中的联合动议，并为下一步的潜在步骤提供了明确的指导后，来自Ripple社区的专家和律师分享了他们对未来的看法。

Crypto Legal Expert Shares Important Point on Judge Torres's Perspective

加密法律专家分享了托雷斯法官的观点的重要一点

Among the legal experts who weighed in on the implications of Judge Analisa Torres' latest ruling, John Deaton, a prominent crypto lawyer, and founder of the DEATON AND GRANT, LLP firm, shared an interesting point on the perspective of the court.

在法律专家中，他们对Analisa Torres法官的最新裁决的影响，著名的加密律师约翰·迪顿（John Deaton）和有限责任公司Deaton and Grant的创始人约翰·迪顿（John Deaton）在法院的观点上分享了一个有趣的观点。

According to Deaton, Judge Analisa Torres's perspective is that the SEC has invested five years aggressively pursuing its legal strategy against Ripple, consuming “thousands of hours of legal and judicial manpower,” only to now suggest that much of this extensive effort was meaningless.

根据迪顿（Deaton）的说法，Analisa Torres法官的观点是，SEC已经投资了五年，积极地追求其针对Ripple的法律战略，消耗了“数千个小时的法律和司法人力”，但目前这表明，这种广泛的努力毫无意义。

"The Court viewed the parties’ joint motion as an attempt to "undo" her final judgment, noting that her prior decision had already engaged "legal and economic firepower" and consumed "thousands of hours of manpower.”

“法院将当事方的联合动议视为“取消”她的最终判决的一种企图，并指出她先前的裁决已经与“法律和经济火力”订婚，并消耗了“数千小时的人力”。

Coming Together to Address Judge Torres’ Concerns

聚在一起谈论托雷斯法官的关注

After the court decision, Sebastien Neretti, the CLO of Ripple, said that they would be coming together with the SEC to address Judge Torres’ concerns.

法院裁决后，波纹的克洛塞巴斯蒂安·内雷蒂（Sebastien Neretti）表示，他们将与SEC一起向托雷斯法官的担忧讲话。

In a message on the X platform, Neretti said that the judge had expressed concerns that the parties were trying to get out of two major penalties: the order to stop selling illegal securities and the requirement to pay the full fine.

Neretti在X平台上的一条消息中说，法官表示担心当事方试图摆脱两个主要处罚：停止出售非法证券的命令以及支付全部罚款的要求。

Neretti said: "This is about procedural concerns with the dismissal of Ripple’s cross-appeal. Both parties would need to satisfy specific legal requirements and demonstrate that modifying her prior decision would serve the interests of both the public and institutional XRP buyers, the judge said.

Neretti说：“这是关于驳回Ripple的交叉上诉的程序问题。双方都需要满足特定的法律要求，并证明修改她的先前决定将符合公共和机构XRP买家的利益，法官说。

The judge’s response to the parties’ joint motion for an “indicative ruling” came

法官对当事方对“指示性裁决”的联合动议的回应来了