為什麼XRP可能不包括在美國加密保護區？

圍繞美國政府不斷發展的加密政策的最新發展，最近的見解表明，XRP可能會被淘汰，而不是比特幣。

Recent developments suggest that XRP might not be included into the U.S. crypto reserve. According to Coin Bureau, this opinion is driven by a mix of regulatory delays, political influence, and potential personal bias.

最近的事態發展表明，XRP可能不包括在美國加密保護區中。根據Coin局的說法，這種觀點是由監管延誤，政治影響力和潛在的個人偏見的混合所驅動的。

As the concept of a U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve in 2024 continues to take shape, Lummis’s known preference for Bitcoin has led some to question why other major assets are not being discussed.

隨著2024年美國戰略比特幣儲備的概念不斷成形，盧米斯（Lummis）對比特幣的已知偏好導致一些人質疑為什麼不討論其他主要資產。

suggest that any hopes of seeing XRP included in the U.S. crypto reserve are fading fast.

建議看到在美國加密保護區中看到XRP的任何希望都快速消失。

This opinion is driven by a mix of regulatory delays, political influence, and what appears to be personal bias against the asset.

這種觀點是由監管延誤，政治影響力以及對資產的個人偏見的混合所驅動的。

Highlighting the potential biases at play, Coin Bureau noted that Will Cole, Lummis’s son-in-law, had previously shared posts on social media. In these posts, Cole openly calls XRP a “fake token” and refers to Ripple as a “centralized joke of a scam.” This revelation further amplifies the impression that personal opinions are impacting broader policy decisions.

Coin Bureau指出，強調了潛在的偏見，Lummis的女son Will Cole以前在社交媒體上分享了帖子。在這些帖子中，科爾公開稱XRP為“假代幣”，並將Ripple稱為“騙局的集中笑話”。這種啟示進一步增強了個人意見正在影響更廣泛的政策決策的印象。

Having begun his career as a junior legal professional at the renowned law firm Cleary Gottlieb, Cole transitioned to serve as an administrative aide to Senator Lummis. He later took on the role of a policy advisor in the U.S. Senate.

科爾（Cole Gottlieb）在著名的律師事務所Cleary Gottlieb擔任初級法律專業人員的職業生涯後，科爾（Cole）過渡為擔任參議員盧米斯（Lummis）的行政助手。後來，他在美國參議院擔任政策顧問的角色。

This progression offers a glimpse into the interconnectedness of legal, political, and personal domains within the unfolding saga of the U.S. crypto policy landscape.

這種進步可瞥見美國加密政策格局不斷發展的傳奇中法律，政治和個人領域的相互聯繫。

The implications of these biases become even more clear when considering the fate of Trump’s executive order related to the U.S. crypto reserve.

考慮到特朗普的行政命令與美國加密保護區有關的命運，這些偏見的含義變得更加清晰。

Initially, the executive order included both Bitcoin and XRP, alongside Ethereum, Solana, and ADA. However, by the time the finalized directive was issued, only Bitcoin remained on the list.

最初，行政命令包括比特幣和XRP，以及以太坊，Solana和Ada。但是，到發布最終指令時，只有比特幣仍保留在列表中。

This shift gave rise to speculation that altcoins were deliberately excluded from the administration’s plans.

這一轉變引起了人們的猜測，即故意將altcoins排除在政府的計劃之外。

suggest that any hopes of seeing XRP included in the U.S. crypto reserve are fading fast.

建議看到在美國加密保護區中看到XRP的任何希望都快速消失。

This opinion is driven by a mix of regulatory delays, political influence, and what appears to be personal bias against the asset.

這種觀點是由監管延誤，政治影響力以及對資產的個人偏見的混合所驅動的。

Highlighting the potential biases at play, Coin Bureau noted that Lummis’s son-in-law, had previously shared posts on social media. In these posts, Cole openly calls XRP a “fake token” and refers to Ripple as a “centralized joke of a scam.” This revelation further amplifies the impression that personal opinions are impacting broader policy decisions.

Coin Bureau指出，Lummis的女son以前在社交媒體上分享了帖子。在這些帖子中，科爾公開稱XRP為“假代幣”，並將Ripple稱為“騙局的集中笑話”。這種啟示進一步增強了個人意見正在影響更廣泛的政策決策的印象。

Having begun his career as a junior legal professional at the renowned law firm Cleary Gottlieb, Cole transitioned to serve as an administrative aide to Senator Lummis. He later took on the role of a policy advisor in the U.S. Senate.

科爾（Cole Gottlieb）在著名的律師事務所Cleary Gottlieb擔任初級法律專業人員的職業生涯後，科爾（Cole）過渡為擔任參議員盧米斯（Lummis）的行政助手。後來，他在美國參議院擔任政策顧問的角色。

This progression offers a glimpse into the interconnectedness of legal, political, and personal domains within the unfolding saga of the U.S. crypto policy landscape.

這種進步可瞥見美國加密政策格局不斷發展的傳奇中法律，政治和個人領域的相互聯繫。

The implications of these biases become even more clear when considering the fate of Trump’s executive order related to the U.S. crypto reserve.

考慮到特朗普的行政命令與美國加密保護區有關的命運，這些偏見的含義變得更加清晰。

Initially, the executive order included both Bitcoin and XRP, along with Solana, and ADA. But by the time the finalized directive was issued, only Bitcoin remained.

最初，行政命令包括比特幣和XRP，以及Solana和Ada。但是到發布了最終的指令時，只保留了比特幣。

This shift fueled speculation that altcoins were being excluded.

這種轉變加劇了人們認為排除替代幣的猜測。