为什么XRP可能不包括在美国加密保护区？

围绕美国政府不断发展的加密政策的最新发展，最近的见解表明，XRP可能会被淘汰，而不是比特币。

Recent developments suggest that XRP might not be included into the U.S. crypto reserve. According to Coin Bureau, this opinion is driven by a mix of regulatory delays, political influence, and potential personal bias.

最近的事态发展表明，XRP可能不包括在美国加密保护区中。根据Coin局的说法，这种观点是由监管延误，政治影响力和潜在的个人偏见的混合所驱动的。

As the concept of a U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve in 2024 continues to take shape, Lummis’s known preference for Bitcoin has led some to question why other major assets are not being discussed.

随着2024年美国战略比特币储备的概念不断成形，卢米斯（Lummis）对比特币的已知偏好导致一些人质疑为什么不讨论其他主要资产。

suggest that any hopes of seeing XRP included in the U.S. crypto reserve are fading fast.

建议看到在美国加密保护区中看到XRP的任何希望都快速消失。

This opinion is driven by a mix of regulatory delays, political influence, and what appears to be personal bias against the asset.

这种观点是由监管延误，政治影响力以及对资产的个人偏见的混合所驱动的。

Highlighting the potential biases at play, Coin Bureau noted that Will Cole, Lummis’s son-in-law, had previously shared posts on social media. In these posts, Cole openly calls XRP a “fake token” and refers to Ripple as a “centralized joke of a scam.” This revelation further amplifies the impression that personal opinions are impacting broader policy decisions.

Coin Bureau指出，强调了潜在的偏见，Lummis的女son Will Cole以前在社交媒体上分享了帖子。在这些帖子中，科尔公开称XRP为“假代币”，并将Ripple称为“骗局的集中笑话”。这种启示进一步增强了个人意见正在影响更广泛的政策决策的印象。

Having begun his career as a junior legal professional at the renowned law firm Cleary Gottlieb, Cole transitioned to serve as an administrative aide to Senator Lummis. He later took on the role of a policy advisor in the U.S. Senate.

科尔（Cole Gottlieb）在著名的律师事务所Cleary Gottlieb担任初级法律专业人员的职业生涯后，科尔（Cole）过渡为担任参议员卢米斯（Lummis）的行政助手。后来，他在美国参议院担任政策顾问的角色。

This progression offers a glimpse into the interconnectedness of legal, political, and personal domains within the unfolding saga of the U.S. crypto policy landscape.

这种进步可瞥见美国加密政策格局不断发展的传奇中法律，政治和个人领域的相互联系。

The implications of these biases become even more clear when considering the fate of Trump’s executive order related to the U.S. crypto reserve.

考虑到特朗普的行政命令与美国加密保护区有关的命运，这些偏见的含义变得更加清晰。

Initially, the executive order included both Bitcoin and XRP, alongside Ethereum, Solana, and ADA. However, by the time the finalized directive was issued, only Bitcoin remained on the list.

最初，行政命令包括比特币和XRP，以及以太坊，Solana和Ada。但是，到发布最终指令时，只有比特币仍保留在列表中。

This shift gave rise to speculation that altcoins were deliberately excluded from the administration’s plans.

这一转变引起了人们的猜测，即故意将altcoins排除在政府的计划之外。

suggest that any hopes of seeing XRP included in the U.S. crypto reserve are fading fast.

建议看到在美国加密保护区中看到XRP的任何希望都快速消失。

This opinion is driven by a mix of regulatory delays, political influence, and what appears to be personal bias against the asset.

这种观点是由监管延误，政治影响力以及对资产的个人偏见的混合所驱动的。

Highlighting the potential biases at play, Coin Bureau noted that Lummis’s son-in-law, had previously shared posts on social media. In these posts, Cole openly calls XRP a “fake token” and refers to Ripple as a “centralized joke of a scam.” This revelation further amplifies the impression that personal opinions are impacting broader policy decisions.

Coin Bureau指出，Lummis的女son以前在社交媒体上分享了帖子。在这些帖子中，科尔公开称XRP为“假代币”，并将Ripple称为“骗局的集中笑话”。这种启示进一步增强了个人意见正在影响更广泛的政策决策的印象。

Having begun his career as a junior legal professional at the renowned law firm Cleary Gottlieb, Cole transitioned to serve as an administrative aide to Senator Lummis. He later took on the role of a policy advisor in the U.S. Senate.

科尔（Cole Gottlieb）在著名的律师事务所Cleary Gottlieb担任初级法律专业人员的职业生涯后，科尔（Cole）过渡为担任参议员卢米斯（Lummis）的行政助手。后来，他在美国参议院担任政策顾问的角色。

This progression offers a glimpse into the interconnectedness of legal, political, and personal domains within the unfolding saga of the U.S. crypto policy landscape.

这种进步可瞥见美国加密政策格局不断发展的传奇中法律，政治和个人领域的相互联系。

The implications of these biases become even more clear when considering the fate of Trump’s executive order related to the U.S. crypto reserve.

考虑到特朗普的行政命令与美国加密保护区有关的命运，这些偏见的含义变得更加清晰。

Initially, the executive order included both Bitcoin and XRP, along with Solana, and ADA. But by the time the finalized directive was issued, only Bitcoin remained.

最初，行政命令包括比特币和XRP，以及Solana和Ada。但是到发布了最终的指令时，只保留了比特币。

This shift fueled speculation that altcoins were being excluded.

这种转变加剧了人们认为排除替代币的猜测。