上週，警報響起了一項提案，以通過比特幣腳本的操作代碼放鬆數據存儲限制。

這是對完整節點軟件政策的看法較小的變化，它闡明了侵犯比特幣技術開發的公司利益。

Last week, alarm bells rang over a proposal to relax data storage limitations via an operation code of Bitcoin script.

上週，警報響起了一項提案，以通過比特幣腳本的操作代碼放鬆數據存儲限制。

It was a deceptively minor change to the policy of full node software that shed light on the corporate interests encroaching on Bitcoin’s technical development.

這是對完整節點軟件政策的看法較小的變化，它闡明了侵犯比特幣技術開發的公司利益。

Instead of rubber-stamping the idea, technical Bitcoiners sprang into action, whipping up support for their side of the debate. Critics revealed the commercial interests of companies like Citrea and an assortment of zero-knowledge (ZK) and Bitcoin virtual machine (BitVM) companies that are pushing developers to raise data storage abilities.

技術比特幣沒有採取行動，而不是橡皮圖stamp，而是為他們的辯論提供了支持。評論家揭示了諸如Citrea等公司的商業利益以及各種零知識（ZK）和比特幣虛擬機（BITVM）公司，這些公司正在推動開發人員提高數據存儲能力。

In a sly request to tweak the world’s most popular full node software, Bitcoin Core, a few developers seemed to believe that lifting OP_RETURN’s datacarrier output limit from 83 to hundreds of thousands of bytes would achieve quick consensus and earn nearly immediate approval from Bitcoin Core maintainers.

為了調整世界上最受歡迎的完整節點軟件（比特幣核心）的要求，一些開發人員似乎相信，將OP_Return的DataCarrier輸出限制從83到數十萬個字節提升，將獲得快速共識，並獲得幾乎立即獲得比特幣核心維護者的批准。

Although sophisticated users have always been able to privately broadcast large OP_RETURN transactions to miners via Libre Relay or MARA Slipstream, Bitcoin Core’s standardness rules for queueing transactions across its default mempool denied OP_RETURN outputs exceeding 83 bytes.

儘管先進的用戶一直能夠通過Libre Relay或Mara Slipstream私人廣播向礦工私下廣播，但比特幣Core的標準性規則，用於在其默認的Mempool denied OP_Return輸出中排隊交易的標準性規則超過83個字節。

Lifting its datacarrier cap would have changed an important standardness rule for transactions and allowed large quantities of non-financial data to propagate across the mempools of tens of thousands of Bitcoin Core nodes as operators progressively updated their software.

舉起其數據載波上限將改變交易的重要標準性規則，並允許大量的非財務數據在運營商逐步更新其軟件時，在數万個比特幣核心節點的Mempool中傳播。

Usually a conservative developer, a self-empowered Peter Todd opened pull request (PR) 32359 at the request of Chaincode Labs’ Antoine Poinsot.

通常是一個保守的開發人員，是一個自我授權的彼得·托德（Peter Todd），應鏈碼實驗室的Antoine Pooinsot的要求，打開了拉動請求（PR）32359。

The GitHub comment section went viral, and within hours, moderators started muting and censoring participation as fiery posts blamed developers and their corporate backers.

Github評論部分傳播開來，在數小時之內，當Fiery Posts指責開發商及其公司支持者時，主持人開始靜音和審查參與。

One critic chimed in, “The PR seems to anticipate some company’s mere intent. Are we now shapeshifting Bitcoin to whatever people publish they might be doing? Bitcoin has a purpose and it’s not appeasement.”

一位批評家說：“公關似乎只預計某些公司的意圖。我們現在是否將比特幣變成了他們可能正在發表的任何人？比特幣有目的，這不是app腳。”

Moderators’ rarely-exercised power of censorship on GitHub only attracted more attention to the debate. Observers even blamed Todd for using PR 32359 to quietly re-introduce his PR 28130 that failed to achieve consensus in 2023.

主持人在Github上少數受到審查的力量只吸引了人們對辯論的關注。觀察者甚至指責托德（Todd）使用PR 32359悄悄地重新引入了他的PR 28130，該PR 28130在2023年未能達成共識。

He used generous language for his request, including “uncap datacarrier by default” or “remove arbitrary restrictions on OP_RETURN by default.” In reality, the proposal’s real intent was to stop filtering large quantities of non-financial data — important context that seemed obscured by the technical description.

他使用慷慨的語言來要求他的要求，包括“默認情況下UNCAP DataCarrier”或“默認情況下刪除對OP_Return的任意限制”。實際上，該提案的真正目的是停止過濾大量的非財務數據 - 似乎被技術描述掩蓋的重要背景。

Many Bitcoin developers are opposed to policies that encourage the use of its limited storage capabilities for non-financial information like pictures, games, business data, or other forms of media unrelated to BTC transactions.

許多比特幣開發人員反對鼓勵使用其有限的存儲功能來用於非財務信息（例如圖片，遊戲，商業數據或其他與BTC交易無關的媒體）的政策。

if you're interested in the conversation from 2 years agoThis is NOT* the one from this year.A failed proposal, again, with even less configurability

如果您對2年的對話感興趣，而Agothis的對話不是*今年的一個。

Specifically, critics blamed Todd for re-introducing an even more generous version of his 2023 code by withholding a config option.

具體而言，批評家指責TODD通過扣留配置選項來重新引入其2023代碼的更慷慨的版本。

Rather than leaving the OP_RETURN datacarrier limit as a configurable piece of code — such as raising the number from 83 to several hundreds of thousands of bytes, and leaving the digits available for self-configuration — Todd simply removed the config code entirely in order to prevent users from setting any custom number.

與其將OP_Return DataCarrier限製作為可配置的代碼，例如將數字從83增加到數十萬個字節，並留下可用於自我配置的數字，TODD只是完全刪除了配置代碼，以防止用戶設置任何自定義號碼。

In other words, critics blamed Todd for attempting to slide a change through with a bit of wet glue that would cement its dominance once implemented — preventing users from modifying the number themselves on their own node.

換句話說，批評家指責托德（Todd）試圖用一些濕膠滑動變化，以鞏固其在實施的主導地位，以防止用戶在自己的節點上修改數字自己。

In short, it was disrespectful to Bitcoin Core’s ethos of consensus-based software development.

簡而言之，這對比特幣核心基於共識的軟件開發精神不尊重。

According to Todd’s code, the change would be drastic: lifting the OP_RETURN datacarrier limit from 83 bytes up to just under the full, 1MB limit of a single block, less other data — and disallowing Bitcoin Code node operators from having the option to adjust that limit manually.

根據托德（Todd）的代碼，更改將是巨大的：將OP_Return DataCarrier限制從83個字節限製到只有一個塊的完整1MB限制，較少的其他數據，而不允許比特幣代碼運算符可以使該選項具有手動調整該限制的選項。

This was particularly offensive to the self-sovereign ethos of Bitcoin, which values the ability of node operators to choose their own mempool and transaction relay policies.

這對比特幣的自我主權精神尤其令人反感，該精神重視節點運營商選擇自己的MEMPOOL和交易繼電器策略的能力。

The more I look into it the worse if gets.Again this isn't a technical debate. It's just bad actors pushing malicious changes into Bitcoin lying about the effects it will have.Citrea *need* your mempool to tolerate their junk, and Core are determined to help them with that by…

我對它的研究越多，如果得到的話，這不是技術辯論。這只是不好的演員，將惡意變化推向比特幣的影響。

As tensions swirled, many people also blamed the corporate interests of the leading spokesman for PR 32359, Jameson Lopp. One of his companies, Citrea, has raised millions of dollars from venture capitalists and could benefit from publishing larger-than-83 byte quantities of data via Bitcoin’s OP_RETURN datacarrier.

隨著緊張局勢的旋轉，許多人還指責PR 32359（Jameson Lopp）領先發言人的公司利益。他的一家公司Citrea已從風險投資家中籌集了數百萬美元，可以通過Bitcoin的OP_Return DataCarrier發布大量的數據，從83號字節發表大量數據中受益。

Citrea supports a suite of third-party applications and businesses, including altcoin token exchanges, DAOs, oracles, and yield-bearing stablecoins.

Citrea支持一套第三方應用程序和企業，包括Altcoin代幣交易所，Daos，Oracles和Barteragaring Stablecoins。

There

那裡