上周，警报响起了一项提案，以通过比特币脚本的操作代码放松数据存储限制。

这是对完整节点软件政策的看法较小的变化，它阐明了侵犯比特币技术开发的公司利益。

Last week, alarm bells rang over a proposal to relax data storage limitations via an operation code of Bitcoin script.

上周，警报响起了一项提案，以通过比特币脚本的操作代码放松数据存储限制。

It was a deceptively minor change to the policy of full node software that shed light on the corporate interests encroaching on Bitcoin’s technical development.

这是对完整节点软件政策的看法较小的变化，它阐明了侵犯比特币技术开发的公司利益。

Instead of rubber-stamping the idea, technical Bitcoiners sprang into action, whipping up support for their side of the debate. Critics revealed the commercial interests of companies like Citrea and an assortment of zero-knowledge (ZK) and Bitcoin virtual machine (BitVM) companies that are pushing developers to raise data storage abilities.

技术比特币没有采取行动，而不是橡皮图stamp，而是为他们的辩论提供了支持。评论家揭示了诸如Citrea等公司的商业利益以及各种零知识（ZK）和比特币虚拟机（BITVM）公司，这些公司正在推动开发人员提高数据存储能力。

In a sly request to tweak the world’s most popular full node software, Bitcoin Core, a few developers seemed to believe that lifting OP_RETURN’s datacarrier output limit from 83 to hundreds of thousands of bytes would achieve quick consensus and earn nearly immediate approval from Bitcoin Core maintainers.

为了调整世界上最受欢迎的完整节点软件（比特币核心）的要求，一些开发人员似乎相信，将OP_Return的DataCarrier输出限制从83到数十万个字节提升，将获得快速共识，并获得几乎立即获得比特币核心维护者的批准。

Although sophisticated users have always been able to privately broadcast large OP_RETURN transactions to miners via Libre Relay or MARA Slipstream, Bitcoin Core’s standardness rules for queueing transactions across its default mempool denied OP_RETURN outputs exceeding 83 bytes.

尽管先进的用户一直能够通过Libre Relay或Mara Slipstream私人广播向矿工私下广播，但比特币Core的标准性规则，用于在其默认的Mempool denied OP_Return输出中排队交易的标准性规则超过83个字节。

Lifting its datacarrier cap would have changed an important standardness rule for transactions and allowed large quantities of non-financial data to propagate across the mempools of tens of thousands of Bitcoin Core nodes as operators progressively updated their software.

举起其数据载波上限将改变交易的重要标准性规则，并允许大量的非财务数据在运营商逐步更新其软件时，在数万个比特币核心节点的Mempool中传播。

Usually a conservative developer, a self-empowered Peter Todd opened pull request (PR) 32359 at the request of Chaincode Labs’ Antoine Poinsot.

通常是一个保守的开发人员，是一个自我授权的彼得·托德（Peter Todd），应链码实验室的Antoine Pooinsot的要求，打开了拉动请求（PR）32359。

The GitHub comment section went viral, and within hours, moderators started muting and censoring participation as fiery posts blamed developers and their corporate backers.

Github评论部分传播开来，在数小时之内，当Fiery Posts指责开发商及其公司支持者时，主持人开始静音和审查参与。

One critic chimed in, “The PR seems to anticipate some company’s mere intent. Are we now shapeshifting Bitcoin to whatever people publish they might be doing? Bitcoin has a purpose and it’s not appeasement.”

一位批评家说：“公关似乎只预计某些公司的意图。我们现在是否将比特币变成了他们可能正在发表的任何人？比特币有目的，这不是app脚。”

Moderators’ rarely-exercised power of censorship on GitHub only attracted more attention to the debate. Observers even blamed Todd for using PR 32359 to quietly re-introduce his PR 28130 that failed to achieve consensus in 2023.

主持人在Github上少数受到审查的力量只吸引了人们对辩论的关注。观察者甚至指责托德（Todd）使用PR 32359悄悄地重新引入了他的PR 28130，该PR 28130在2023年未能达成共识。

He used generous language for his request, including “uncap datacarrier by default” or “remove arbitrary restrictions on OP_RETURN by default.” In reality, the proposal’s real intent was to stop filtering large quantities of non-financial data — important context that seemed obscured by the technical description.

他使用慷慨的语言来要求他的要求，包括“默认情况下UNCAP DataCarrier”或“默认情况下删除对OP_Return的任意限制”。实际上，该提案的真正目的是停止过滤大量的非财务数据 - 似乎被技术描述掩盖的重要背景。

Many Bitcoin developers are opposed to policies that encourage the use of its limited storage capabilities for non-financial information like pictures, games, business data, or other forms of media unrelated to BTC transactions.

许多比特币开发人员反对鼓励使用其有限的存储功能来用于非财务信息（例如图片，游戏，商业数据或其他与BTC交易无关的媒体）的政策。

if you're interested in the conversation from 2 years agoThis is NOT* the one from this year.A failed proposal, again, with even less configurability

如果您对2年的对话感兴趣，而Agothis的对话不是*今年的一个。

Specifically, critics blamed Todd for re-introducing an even more generous version of his 2023 code by withholding a config option.

具体而言，批评家指责TODD通过扣留配置选项来重新引入其2023代码的更慷慨的版本。

Rather than leaving the OP_RETURN datacarrier limit as a configurable piece of code — such as raising the number from 83 to several hundreds of thousands of bytes, and leaving the digits available for self-configuration — Todd simply removed the config code entirely in order to prevent users from setting any custom number.

与其将OP_Return DataCarrier限制作为可配置的代码，例如将数字从83增加到数十万个字节，并留下可用于自我配置的数字，TODD只是完全删除了配置代码，以防止用户设置任何自定义号码。

In other words, critics blamed Todd for attempting to slide a change through with a bit of wet glue that would cement its dominance once implemented — preventing users from modifying the number themselves on their own node.

换句话说，批评家指责托德（Todd）试图用一些湿胶滑动变化，以巩固其在实施的主导地位，以防止用户在自己的节点上修改数字自己。

In short, it was disrespectful to Bitcoin Core’s ethos of consensus-based software development.

简而言之，这对比特币核心基于共识的软件开发精神不尊重。

According to Todd’s code, the change would be drastic: lifting the OP_RETURN datacarrier limit from 83 bytes up to just under the full, 1MB limit of a single block, less other data — and disallowing Bitcoin Code node operators from having the option to adjust that limit manually.

根据托德（Todd）的代码，更改将是巨大的：将OP_Return DataCarrier限制从83个字节限制到只有一个块的完整1MB限制，较少的其他数据，而不允许比特币代码运算符可以使该选项具有手动调整该限制的选项。

This was particularly offensive to the self-sovereign ethos of Bitcoin, which values the ability of node operators to choose their own mempool and transaction relay policies.

这对比特币的自我主权精神尤其令人反感，该精神重视节点运营商选择自己的MEMPOOL和交易继电器策略的能力。

The more I look into it the worse if gets.Again this isn't a technical debate. It's just bad actors pushing malicious changes into Bitcoin lying about the effects it will have.Citrea *need* your mempool to tolerate their junk, and Core are determined to help them with that by…

我对它的研究越多，如果得到的话，这不是技术辩论。这只是不好的演员，将恶意变化推向比特币的影响。

As tensions swirled, many people also blamed the corporate interests of the leading spokesman for PR 32359, Jameson Lopp. One of his companies, Citrea, has raised millions of dollars from venture capitalists and could benefit from publishing larger-than-83 byte quantities of data via Bitcoin’s OP_RETURN datacarrier.

随着紧张局势的旋转，许多人还指责PR 32359（Jameson Lopp）领先发言人的公司利益。他的一家公司Citrea已从风险投资家中筹集了数百万美元，可以通过Bitcoin的OP_Return DataCarrier发布大量的数据，从83号字节发表大量数据中受益。

Citrea supports a suite of third-party applications and businesses, including altcoin token exchanges, DAOs, oracles, and yield-bearing stablecoins.

Citrea支持一套第三方应用程序和企业，包括Altcoin代币交易所，Daos，Oracles和Barteragaring Stablecoins。

There

那里