英國法院拒絕Binance BSV提起訴訟賠償

英國上訴法院對比特幣SV投資者裁定，要求對包括二金在內的幾次加密貨幣交易所尋求大規模損害賠償。

The British Court of Appeal has ruled against Bitcoin SV (BSV) investors who are seeking billions of pounds in damages from several cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance, for the 2019 delisting of the cryptocurrency.

英國上訴法院對比特幣SV（BSV）投資者裁定，他們正在從包括Binance在內的幾次加密貨幣交易所中尋求數十億英鎊的損害賠償，以使2019年的加密貨幣降落。

On Monday, the court dismissed claims by the investors, known in the case as “sub-class B,” for an aggregate sum of over £8.9 billion. The investors argued that the delisting at a price of around $70 in 2019 prevented them from realizing hypothetical gains if BSV had become a leading cryptocurrency like Bitcoin or Bitcoin Cash.

週一，法院駁回了投資者的索賠，在此案中被稱為“子類B”，總額超過89億英鎊。投資者辯稱，如果BSV已成為像比特幣或比特幣現金等領先的加密貨幣，則以2019年70美元的價格降價，使他們無法實現假設的收益。

However, the court disagreed, noting that the investors’ claims for missed gains were speculative and flawed. It stated that BSV had clear alternatives in the market at the time, and the investors themselves referenced Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash as comparables, which would undermine their claim of BSB’s unique potential.

但是，法院不同意，並指出投資者對錯過收益的主張是投機性和缺陷的。它指出，當時BSV在市場上有明確的替代方案，投資者本身將比特幣和比特幣現金作為可比性，這將破壞他們對BSB獨特潛力的主張。

Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, also pointed out that the investors had a responsibility to mitigate their losses. He said, “They had a duty to mitigate their losses, which they did not do. They cannot recover losses they could reasonably have avoided.”

勞斯萊斯大師杰弗裡·沃斯爵士還指出，投資者有責任減輕損失。他說：“他們有責任減輕他們的損失，而他們沒有造成的損失。他們無法收回可以合理避免的損失。”

This latest ruling, which comes in several stages as part of a broader class action lawsuit, further narrows the scope of the case.

作為更廣泛的集體訴訟的一部分，這項最新的裁決在幾個階段出現，進一步縮小了案件的範圍。

While the investors can still pursue claims for breaches of fiduciary duty and advice relating to the delisting, this part of the case is now largely dependent on whether the lower court’s findings on these issues will be overturned.

儘管投資者仍然可以提出違反信託義務和與脫落有關的建議的要求，但此案件的這一部分現在主要取決於下級法院對這些問題的調查結果是否會被推翻。

The case began in 2019 after several Binance users, who were holding BSV at the time of its delisting, sued the exchange for compensation. They claimed they were induced by Binance to buy BSV and were not notified in advance about its delisting.

該案始於2019年，此前幾位二元使用者在推遲時持有BSV的數名使用者起訴了賠償額。他們聲稱他們是被Binance誘使購買BSV的，並且沒有事先通知其推薦。

The investors argued that Binance had a duty of care to them as vulnerable customers and that the exchange should have provided more advice and acted in their best interest.

投資者辯稱，Binance作為脆弱的客戶有責任照顧他們，並且該交易所應該提供更多的建議並符合其最大利益。

However, the court found that Binance had no obligation to provide investment advice to the investors or to disclose its internal price analysis. It also stated that the investors were experienced traders who could have made their own investment decisions.

但是，法院裁定，Binance沒有義務向投資者提供投資建議或披露其內部價格分析。它還指出，投資者是經驗豐富的商人，他們本可以自己做出的投資決定。

The case is still ongoing, but this latest ruling is a major setback for the investors. It could have significant implications for other class action lawsuits and cases involving cryptocurrency investments in the UK.

該案仍在進行中，但是這項最新裁決是投資者的重大挫折。這可能對涉及英國加密貨幣投資的其他集體訴訟和案件產生重大影響。

The post UK Court Rejects Binance BSV Delisting Lawsuit Damages appeared first on ihoops.

英國郵政法院駁回了BSV的BSV提起訴訟賠償，這首先出現在IHOOPS上。

The British Court of Appeal has ruled against Bitcoin SV (BSV) investors who are seeking billions of pounds in damages from several cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance, for the 2019 delisting of the cryptocurrency.

英國上訴法院對比特幣SV（BSV）投資者裁定，他們正在從包括Binance在內的幾次加密貨幣交易所中尋求數十億英鎊的損害賠償，以使2019年的加密貨幣降落。

On Monday, the court dismissed claims by the investors, known in the case as “sub-class B,” for an aggregate sum of over £8.9 billion ($11.9 billion). The investors argued that the delisting at a price of around $70 in 2019 prevented them from realizing hypothetical gains if BSV had become a leading cryptocurrency like Bitcoin or Bitcoin Cash.

週一，法院駁回了投資者的索賠，在此案中被稱為“子級B”，總額超過89億英鎊（119億美元）。投資者辯稱，如果BSV已成為像比特幣或比特幣現金等領先的加密貨幣，則以2019年70美元的價格降價，使他們無法實現假設的收益。

However, the court disagreed, noting that the investors’ claims for missed gains were speculative and flawed. It stated that BSV had clear alternatives in the market at the time, and the investors themselves referenced Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash as comparables, which would undermine their claim of BSB’s unique potential.

但是，法院不同意，並指出投資者對錯過收益的主張是投機性和缺陷的。它指出，當時BSV在市場上有明確的替代方案，投資者本身將比特幣和比特幣現金作為可比性，這將破壞他們對BSB獨特潛力的主張。

Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, also pointed out that the investors had a responsibility to mitigate their losses. He said, “They had a duty to mitigate their losses, which they did not do. They cannot recover losses they could reasonably have avoided.”

勞斯萊斯大師杰弗裡·沃斯爵士還指出，投資者有責任減輕損失。他說：“他們有責任減輕他們的損失，而他們沒有造成的損失。他們無法收回可以合理避免的損失。”

This latest ruling, which comes in several stages as part of a broader class action lawsuit, further narrows the scope of the case.

作為更廣泛的集體訴訟的一部分，這項最新的裁決在幾個階段出現，進一步縮小了案件的範圍。

While the investors can still pursue claims for breaches of fiduciary duty and advice relating to the delisting, this part of the case is now largely dependent on whether the lower court’s findings on these issues will be overturned.

儘管投資者仍然可以提出違反信託義務和與脫落有關的建議的要求，但此案件的這一部分現在主要取決於下級法院對這些問題的調查結果是否會被推翻。

The case began in 2019 after several Binance users, who were holding BSV at the time of its delisting, sued the exchange for compensation. They claimed they were induced by Binance to buy BSV and were not notified in advance about its delisting.

該案始於2019年，此前幾位二元使用者在推遲時持有BSV的數名使用者起訴了賠償額。他們聲稱他們是被Binance誘使購買BSV的，並且沒有事先通知其推薦。

The investors argued that Binance had a duty of care to them as vulnerable customers and that the exchange should have provided more advice and acted in their best interest.

投資者辯稱，Binance作為脆弱的客戶有責任照顧他們，並且該交易所應該提供更多的建議並符合其最大利益。

However, the court found that Binance had no obligation to provide investment advice to the investors or to disclose its internal price analysis. It also stated that the investors were experienced traders who could have made their own investment decisions.

但是，法院裁定，Binance沒有義務向投資者提供投資建議或披露其內部價格分析。它還指出，投資者是經驗豐富的商人，他們本可以自己做出的投資決定。

This case is still ongoing, but this latest ruling is a major setback for the investors. It could have significant implications for other class action lawsuits and cases involving cryptocurrency investments in the UK.

這個案件仍在進行中，但是這項最新裁決是投資者的重大挫折。這可能對涉及英國加密貨幣投資的其他集體訴訟和案件產生重大影響。

The post UK Court Rejects Binance BSV Delisting Lawsuit Damages appeared first on ihoops.

英國郵政法院駁回了BSV的BSV提起訴訟賠償，這首先出現在IHOOPS上。