英国法院拒绝Binance BSV提起诉讼赔偿

英国上诉法院对比特币SV投资者裁定，要求对包括二金在内的几次加密货币交易所寻求大规模损害赔偿。

The British Court of Appeal has ruled against Bitcoin SV (BSV) investors who are seeking billions of pounds in damages from several cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance, for the 2019 delisting of the cryptocurrency.

英国上诉法院对比特币SV（BSV）投资者裁定，他们正在从包括Binance在内的几次加密货币交易所中寻求数十亿英镑的损害赔偿，以使2019年的加密货币降落。

On Monday, the court dismissed claims by the investors, known in the case as “sub-class B,” for an aggregate sum of over £8.9 billion. The investors argued that the delisting at a price of around $70 in 2019 prevented them from realizing hypothetical gains if BSV had become a leading cryptocurrency like Bitcoin or Bitcoin Cash.

周一，法院驳回了投资者的索赔，在此案中被称为“子类B”，总额超过89亿英镑。投资者辩称，如果BSV已成为像比特币或比特币现金等领先的加密货币，则以2019年70美元的价格降价，使他们无法实现假设的收益。

However, the court disagreed, noting that the investors’ claims for missed gains were speculative and flawed. It stated that BSV had clear alternatives in the market at the time, and the investors themselves referenced Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash as comparables, which would undermine their claim of BSB’s unique potential.

但是，法院不同意，并指出投资者对错过收益的主张是投机性和缺陷的。它指出，当时BSV在市场上有明确的替代方案，投资者本身将比特币和比特币现金作为可比性，这将破坏他们对BSB独特潜力的主张。

Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, also pointed out that the investors had a responsibility to mitigate their losses. He said, “They had a duty to mitigate their losses, which they did not do. They cannot recover losses they could reasonably have avoided.”

劳斯莱斯大师杰弗里·沃斯爵士还指出，投资者有责任减轻损失。他说：“他们有责任减轻他们的损失，而他们没有造成的损失。他们无法收回可以合理避免的损失。”

This latest ruling, which comes in several stages as part of a broader class action lawsuit, further narrows the scope of the case.

作为更广泛的集体诉讼的一部分，这项最新的裁决在几个阶段出现，进一步缩小了案件的范围。

While the investors can still pursue claims for breaches of fiduciary duty and advice relating to the delisting, this part of the case is now largely dependent on whether the lower court’s findings on these issues will be overturned.

尽管投资者仍然可以提出违反信托义务和与脱落有关的建议的要求，但此案件的这一部分现在主要取决于下级法院对这些问题的调查结果是否会被推翻。

The case began in 2019 after several Binance users, who were holding BSV at the time of its delisting, sued the exchange for compensation. They claimed they were induced by Binance to buy BSV and were not notified in advance about its delisting.

该案始于2019年，此前几位二元使用者在推迟时持有BSV的数名使用者起诉了赔偿额。他们声称他们是被Binance诱使购买BSV的，并且没有事先通知其推荐。

The investors argued that Binance had a duty of care to them as vulnerable customers and that the exchange should have provided more advice and acted in their best interest.

投资者辩称，Binance作为脆弱的客户有责任照顾他们，并且该交易所应该提供更多的建议并符合其最大利益。

However, the court found that Binance had no obligation to provide investment advice to the investors or to disclose its internal price analysis. It also stated that the investors were experienced traders who could have made their own investment decisions.

但是，法院裁定，Binance没有义务向投资者提供投资建议或披露其内部价格分析。它还指出，投资者是经验丰富的商人，他们本可以自己做出的投资决定。

The case is still ongoing, but this latest ruling is a major setback for the investors. It could have significant implications for other class action lawsuits and cases involving cryptocurrency investments in the UK.

该案仍在进行中，但是这项最新裁决是投资者的重大挫折。这可能对涉及英国加密货币投资的其他集体诉讼和案件产生重大影响。

The post UK Court Rejects Binance BSV Delisting Lawsuit Damages appeared first on ihoops.

英国邮政法院驳回了BSV的BSV提起诉讼赔偿，这首先出现在IHOOPS上。

The British Court of Appeal has ruled against Bitcoin SV (BSV) investors who are seeking billions of pounds in damages from several cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance, for the 2019 delisting of the cryptocurrency.

英国上诉法院对比特币SV（BSV）投资者裁定，他们正在从包括Binance在内的几次加密货币交易所中寻求数十亿英镑的损害赔偿，以使2019年的加密货币降落。

On Monday, the court dismissed claims by the investors, known in the case as “sub-class B,” for an aggregate sum of over £8.9 billion ($11.9 billion). The investors argued that the delisting at a price of around $70 in 2019 prevented them from realizing hypothetical gains if BSV had become a leading cryptocurrency like Bitcoin or Bitcoin Cash.

周一，法院驳回了投资者的索赔，在此案中被称为“子级B”，总额超过89亿英镑（119亿美元）。投资者辩称，如果BSV已成为像比特币或比特币现金等领先的加密货币，则以2019年70美元的价格降价，使他们无法实现假设的收益。

However, the court disagreed, noting that the investors’ claims for missed gains were speculative and flawed. It stated that BSV had clear alternatives in the market at the time, and the investors themselves referenced Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash as comparables, which would undermine their claim of BSB’s unique potential.

但是，法院不同意，并指出投资者对错过收益的主张是投机性和缺陷的。它指出，当时BSV在市场上有明确的替代方案，投资者本身将比特币和比特币现金作为可比性，这将破坏他们对BSB独特潜力的主张。

Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, also pointed out that the investors had a responsibility to mitigate their losses. He said, “They had a duty to mitigate their losses, which they did not do. They cannot recover losses they could reasonably have avoided.”

劳斯莱斯大师杰弗里·沃斯爵士还指出，投资者有责任减轻损失。他说：“他们有责任减轻他们的损失，而他们没有造成的损失。他们无法收回可以合理避免的损失。”

This latest ruling, which comes in several stages as part of a broader class action lawsuit, further narrows the scope of the case.

作为更广泛的集体诉讼的一部分，这项最新的裁决在几个阶段出现，进一步缩小了案件的范围。

While the investors can still pursue claims for breaches of fiduciary duty and advice relating to the delisting, this part of the case is now largely dependent on whether the lower court’s findings on these issues will be overturned.

尽管投资者仍然可以提出违反信托义务和与脱落有关的建议的要求，但此案件的这一部分现在主要取决于下级法院对这些问题的调查结果是否会被推翻。

The case began in 2019 after several Binance users, who were holding BSV at the time of its delisting, sued the exchange for compensation. They claimed they were induced by Binance to buy BSV and were not notified in advance about its delisting.

该案始于2019年，此前几位二元使用者在推迟时持有BSV的数名使用者起诉了赔偿额。他们声称他们是被Binance诱使购买BSV的，并且没有事先通知其推荐。

The investors argued that Binance had a duty of care to them as vulnerable customers and that the exchange should have provided more advice and acted in their best interest.

投资者辩称，Binance作为脆弱的客户有责任照顾他们，并且该交易所应该提供更多的建议并符合其最大利益。

However, the court found that Binance had no obligation to provide investment advice to the investors or to disclose its internal price analysis. It also stated that the investors were experienced traders who could have made their own investment decisions.

但是，法院裁定，Binance没有义务向投资者提供投资建议或披露其内部价格分析。它还指出，投资者是经验丰富的商人，他们本可以自己做出的投资决定。

This case is still ongoing, but this latest ruling is a major setback for the investors. It could have significant implications for other class action lawsuits and cases involving cryptocurrency investments in the UK.

这个案件仍在进行中，但是这项最新裁决是投资者的重大挫折。这可能对涉及英国加密货币投资的其他集体诉讼和案件产生重大影响。

The post UK Court Rejects Binance BSV Delisting Lawsuit Damages appeared first on ihoops.

英国邮政法院驳回了BSV的BSV提起诉讼赔偿，这首先出现在IHOOPS上。