英國上訴法院駁回了$ 13.3B的比特幣SV針對Binance的訴訟；投資者有機會減輕損失

英國上訴法院駁回了比特幣SV（BSV）投資者對Binance和其他加密貨幣交易所提起的集體訴訟

A British appeals court has dismissed a class action lawsuit filed by Bitcoin SV (BSV) investors against Binance and other cryptocurrency exchanges.

英國上訴法院駁回了比特幣SV（BSV）投資者對Binance和其他加密貨幣交易所提起的集體訴訟。

The investors were seeking between $11.9 billion to $13.3 billion in damages. They claimed that the 2019 delisting of BSV from these platforms led to investors suffering losses. However, the court ruled that the investors had opportunities to mitigate their losses after the delisting and described the argument that BSV could have rivaled Bitcoin (BTC) as speculative.

投資者正在尋求119億至133億美元的損失。他們聲稱，2019年將BSV從這些平台中脫穎而出，導致投資者遭受損失。但是，法院裁定，投資者有機會減輕降級後的損失，並描述了BSV本可以將比特幣（BTC）視為投機性的論點。

"It is clear that the optimum course of conduct for the optimum interest of the Claimants after the Delisting would have been to sell their BSV holdings at the best price obtainable in the market. This optimum course of conduct was not open to the Claimants because they were not able to agree on a course of action," the appeals court ruled.

“很明顯，在熟練的申訴人本來可以在市場上獲得的最高價格出售其BSV持有的最佳行為方向。索賠人無法同意訴訟方案，因為他們無法同意索賠人的最佳行為方案。”上訴法庭裁定。 ”

"The Claimants had the chance to mitigate their losses after the Delisting but chose not to do so. The optimum course of conduct for minimizing the Claimants’ losses would have been to sell their BSV holdings at the best price obtainable in the market after the Delisting."

“索賠人有機會在脫穎而出後減輕損失，但選擇不這樣做。最大程度地減少索賠人的損失的最佳行為方向是，在優質的市場後，以最優惠的價格出售其BSV持股。”

The appeals court went on to dismiss the argument that BSV could have rivaled BTC if it weren't for the actions of these cryptocurrency exchanges.

上訴法院繼續駁回了這樣的論點，即如果不是為了這些加密貨幣交流的行動，BSV可能與BTC競爭。

"This was a matter of speculation and conjecture. There was no evidence to support this claim. It was also irrelevant to the present case. The optimum course of conduct for the Claimants after the Delisting would have been to sell their BSV holdings at the best price obtainable in the market."

“這是一個猜測和猜想的問題。沒有證據支持這一主張。這也與本案件無關。在降價之後，索賠人的最佳行為過程將是以市場上最優惠的價格出售其BSV控股。”

Binance Has Requested a U.S. Federal Court to Dismiss a Related Class Action Lawsuit

Binance已要求美國聯邦法院駁回相關的集體訴訟

A U.S. federal court has been requested by Binance to dismiss a related class action lawsuit. In this lawsuit, investors are claiming that they lost money due to Binance's decision to delist BSV in 2019.

Binance已要求美國聯邦法院駁回相關的集體訴訟。在這項訴訟中，投資者聲稱由於Binance決定在2019年決定BSV而虧損。

According to the request seen on Monday, Binance is aiming to have the lawsuit dismissed as it is subject to a binding arbitration clause in its user agreement. This clause dictates that any legal disputes should be settled through private arbitration rather than in open court.

根據周一的請求，二元公司的目標是駁回訴訟，因為它在其用戶協議中受約束力仲裁條款的約束。該條款規定，任何法律糾紛都應通過私人仲裁而不是在公開法院解決。

The investors, who bought BSV during the 2017 bull market, are seeking to recover losses they allegedly incurred when Binance delisted the token in March 2019. BSV's price dropped sharply following the delisting, leading to unrest among the investors who had faith in BSV, especially in light of setbacks faced by Bitcoin in reaching new highs at the time.

在2017年牛市期間購買了BSV的投資者正在尋求追回據稱在2019年3月將代幣淘汰時所遭受的損失。在此之後，BSV的價格急劇下降，導致對BSV充滿信心的投資者的動盪，尤其是鑑於BitCoin在Bitcobacks table Bitcobacks table Coin ta Greation to Repar new Greats the New Perne the the the the the the the the the new Meaths the the the the the the the the the time the time the the the time of the損失。

The investors' lawsuit, filed in December 2022, alleges that Binance misled investors by touting BSV as a viable investment option while secretly planning to delist it as part of a strategy to benefit itself and a small group of insiders.

投資者的訴訟於2022年12月提起，稱通過將BSV作為可行的投資選擇誤導了投資者，同時秘密計劃​​將其推薦為使其受益於自己和一小部分內部人士的戰略的一部分。

The lawsuit claims that Binance deceived investors by touting BSV as a viable investment option while secretly planning to delist it as part of a strategy to benefit itself and a small group of insiders. It alleges that Binance's actions were motivated by a desire to benefit itself and a small group of insiders, leading to the downfall of BSV and causing significant losses to investors who relied on Binance's representations.

該訴訟聲稱，Binance通過將BSV作為可行的投資選擇來欺騙了投資者，同時秘密計劃​​將其推薦為使其受益於自己和一小部分內部人士的戰略的一部分。它聲稱，Binance的行動是出於對自己和一小群內部人士的渴望的渴望，導致BSV倒台，並向依靠Binance代表的投資者造成了巨大損失。

Lukoil Unit's Lawsuit Against Turkey's Palmali Dismissed by UK Court

Lukoil部門針對土耳其Palmali的訴訟被英國法院駁回

A British court has dismissed a lawsuit filed by Lukoil's Litasco against Turkey-based Palmali, which had claimed that the oil trader was unable to fulfill a large-scale oil products deal due to problems with a bank.

英國法院駁回了Lukoil的Litasco針對總部位於土耳其的Palmali的訴訟，該訴訟聲稱，由於銀行問題，石油商人無法履行大規模石油產品協議。

The lawsuit, which was brought in December 2022, arose from a 2021 agreement for Palmali to supply 1.5 million metric tons of jet fuel and diesel to Litasco over a 12-month period.

該訴訟於2022年12月提起，源於2021年帕爾馬利（Palmali）在12個月內向Litasco提供150萬噸噴氣燃料和柴油的協議。

According to the court documents, Palmali managed to deliver only a small portion of the fuel oil and jet fuel to Litasco by December 2022. As a result, Litasco terminated the agreement in January 2023 and initiated legal action to recover damages.

根據法院文件，帕爾馬利（Palmali）在2022年12月之前僅將少量的燃油和噴氣燃料交付給了利塔科（Litasco）。結果，利塔斯科（Litasco）於2023年1月終止了該協議，並提起了法律訴訟以恢復賠償賠償。

However, the court ruled in favor of Palmali, stating that Litasco had not met the conditions for the court to intervene in the matter.

但是，法院裁定有利於Palmali，並指出Litasco尚未滿足法院干預此事的條件。

"The optimum course of conduct for minimizing the Claimants’ losses would have been to sell their BSV holdings at the best price obtainable in the market after the Delisting.”

“最大程度地減少索賠人的損失的最佳行為是以在脫穎而出後在市場上獲得的最佳價格出售其BSV持股。”