英国上诉法院驳回了$ 13.3B的比特币SV针对Binance的诉讼；投资者有机会减轻损失

英国上诉法院驳回了比特币SV（BSV）投资者对Binance和其他加密货币交易所提起的集体诉讼

A British appeals court has dismissed a class action lawsuit filed by Bitcoin SV (BSV) investors against Binance and other cryptocurrency exchanges.

英国上诉法院驳回了比特币SV（BSV）投资者对Binance和其他加密货币交易所提起的集体诉讼。

The investors were seeking between $11.9 billion to $13.3 billion in damages. They claimed that the 2019 delisting of BSV from these platforms led to investors suffering losses. However, the court ruled that the investors had opportunities to mitigate their losses after the delisting and described the argument that BSV could have rivaled Bitcoin (BTC) as speculative.

投资者正在寻求119亿至133亿美元的损失。他们声称，2019年将BSV从这些平台中脱颖而出，导致投资者遭受损失。但是，法院裁定，投资者有机会减轻降级后的损失，并描述了BSV本可以将比特币（BTC）视为投机性的论点。

"It is clear that the optimum course of conduct for the optimum interest of the Claimants after the Delisting would have been to sell their BSV holdings at the best price obtainable in the market. This optimum course of conduct was not open to the Claimants because they were not able to agree on a course of action," the appeals court ruled.

“很明显，在熟练的申诉人本来可以在市场上获得的最高价格出售其BSV持有的最佳行为方向。索赔人无法同意诉讼方案，因为他们无法同意索赔人的最佳行为方案。”上诉法庭裁定。”

"The Claimants had the chance to mitigate their losses after the Delisting but chose not to do so. The optimum course of conduct for minimizing the Claimants’ losses would have been to sell their BSV holdings at the best price obtainable in the market after the Delisting."

“索赔人有机会在脱颖而出后减轻损失，但选择不这样做。最大程度地减少索赔人的损失的最佳行为方向是，在优质的市场后，以最优惠的价格出售其BSV持股。”

The appeals court went on to dismiss the argument that BSV could have rivaled BTC if it weren't for the actions of these cryptocurrency exchanges.

上诉法院继续驳回了这样的论点，即如果不是为了这些加密货币交流的行动，BSV可能与BTC竞争。

"This was a matter of speculation and conjecture. There was no evidence to support this claim. It was also irrelevant to the present case. The optimum course of conduct for the Claimants after the Delisting would have been to sell their BSV holdings at the best price obtainable in the market."

“这是一个猜测和猜想的问题。没有证据支持这一主张。这也与本案件无关。在降价之后，索赔人的最佳行为过程将是以市场上最优惠的价格出售其BSV控股。”

Binance Has Requested a U.S. Federal Court to Dismiss a Related Class Action Lawsuit

Binance已要求美国联邦法院驳回相关的集体诉讼

A U.S. federal court has been requested by Binance to dismiss a related class action lawsuit. In this lawsuit, investors are claiming that they lost money due to Binance's decision to delist BSV in 2019.

Binance已要求美国联邦法院驳回相关的集体诉讼。在这项诉讼中，投资者声称由于Binance决定在2019年决定BSV而亏损。

According to the request seen on Monday, Binance is aiming to have the lawsuit dismissed as it is subject to a binding arbitration clause in its user agreement. This clause dictates that any legal disputes should be settled through private arbitration rather than in open court.

根据周一的请求，二元公司的目标是驳回诉讼，因为它在其用户协议中受约束力仲裁条款的约束。该条款规定，任何法律纠纷都应通过私人仲裁而不是在公开法院解决。

The investors, who bought BSV during the 2017 bull market, are seeking to recover losses they allegedly incurred when Binance delisted the token in March 2019. BSV's price dropped sharply following the delisting, leading to unrest among the investors who had faith in BSV, especially in light of setbacks faced by Bitcoin in reaching new highs at the time.

在2017年牛市期间购买了BSV的投资者正在寻求追回据称在2019年3月将代币淘汰时所遭受的损失。在此之后，BSV的价格急剧下降，导致对BSV充满信心的投资者的动荡，尤其是鉴于BitCoin在Bitcobacks table Bitcobacks table Coin ta Greation to Repar new Greats the New Perne the the the the the the the the the new Meaths the the the the the the the the the time the time the the the time of the损失。

The investors' lawsuit, filed in December 2022, alleges that Binance misled investors by touting BSV as a viable investment option while secretly planning to delist it as part of a strategy to benefit itself and a small group of insiders.

投资者的诉讼于2022年12月提起，称通过将BSV作为可行的投资选择误导了投资者，同时秘密计划​​将其推荐为使其受益于自己和一小部分内部人士的战略的一部分。

The lawsuit claims that Binance deceived investors by touting BSV as a viable investment option while secretly planning to delist it as part of a strategy to benefit itself and a small group of insiders. It alleges that Binance's actions were motivated by a desire to benefit itself and a small group of insiders, leading to the downfall of BSV and causing significant losses to investors who relied on Binance's representations.

该诉讼声称，Binance通过将BSV作为可行的投资选择来欺骗了投资者，同时秘密计划​​将其推荐为使其受益于自己和一小部分内部人士的战略的一部分。它声称，Binance的行动是出于对自己和一小群内部人士的渴望的渴望，导致BSV倒台，并向依靠Binance代表的投资者造成了巨大损失。

Lukoil Unit's Lawsuit Against Turkey's Palmali Dismissed by UK Court

Lukoil部门针对土耳其Palmali的诉讼被英国法院驳回

A British court has dismissed a lawsuit filed by Lukoil's Litasco against Turkey-based Palmali, which had claimed that the oil trader was unable to fulfill a large-scale oil products deal due to problems with a bank.

英国法院驳回了Lukoil的Litasco针对总部位于土耳其的Palmali的诉讼，该诉讼声称，由于银行问题，石油商人无法履行大规模石油产品协议。

The lawsuit, which was brought in December 2022, arose from a 2021 agreement for Palmali to supply 1.5 million metric tons of jet fuel and diesel to Litasco over a 12-month period.

该诉讼于2022年12月提起，源于2021年帕尔马利（Palmali）在12个月内向Litasco提供150万吨喷气燃料和柴油的协议。

According to the court documents, Palmali managed to deliver only a small portion of the fuel oil and jet fuel to Litasco by December 2022. As a result, Litasco terminated the agreement in January 2023 and initiated legal action to recover damages.

根据法院文件，帕尔马利（Palmali）在2022年12月之前仅将少量的燃油和喷气燃料交付给了利塔科（Litasco）。结果，利塔斯科（Litasco）于2023年1月终止了该协议，并提起了法律诉讼以恢复赔偿赔偿。

However, the court ruled in favor of Palmali, stating that Litasco had not met the conditions for the court to intervene in the matter.

但是，法院裁定有利于Palmali，并指出Litasco尚未满足法院干预此事的条件。

"The optimum course of conduct for minimizing the Claimants’ losses would have been to sell their BSV holdings at the best price obtainable in the market after the Delisting.”

“最大程度地减少索赔人的损失的最佳行为是以在脱颖而出后在市场上获得的最佳价格出售其BSV持股。”