堅定的以太坊支持者強烈反對以太坊區塊鍊網絡正在掙扎的觀念

一個堅定的以太坊支持者強烈反對以太坊區塊鍊網絡正在努力通過一次做太多事情而掙扎的觀念

A staunch supporter of Ethereum has come to the fore, arguing vehemently against the assertion that the Ethereum blockchain network is struggling by trying to do too many things at once and subsequently “failing on all fronts.”

以太坊的堅定支持者脫穎而出，強烈爭辯說，以太坊區塊鍊網絡正在努力掙扎，試圖一次做太多事情，然後“在所有方面都失敗”。

The Ethereum supporter’s argument, shared via an X post, stemmed from a response to a crypto critic who, in an earlier post, stated that Ethereum does not dominate any of the three sectors it is trying to be best at. The crypto critic highlighted serving as SoV commodity money, providing the most efficient scalability platform, and having more blobspace than any other network as the three sectors.

以太坊支持者的論點是通過X帖子分享的，源於對加密評論家的回應，在較早的帖子中，他說，以太坊並沒有占主導地位的三個部門中的任何一個。加密評論家強調，用作Sov商品資金，提供最有效的可伸縮性平台，並且比其他任何網絡都具有更多的Blobspace。

According to the critic, Bitcoin, Solana, and Celestia are better suited for each category, respectively, with Ethereum being the second-best in all the highlighted areas.

根據評論家的說法，比特幣，Solana和Celestia分別更適合每個類別，以太坊在所有突出顯示的領域中都是第二好的。

However, the Ethereum supporter attempted to debunk the critic’s claims on all three fronts, classifying Ethereum as the only truly decentralized cryptocurrency network. He berated Bitcoin, highlighting the possibility of a 51% attack on the pioneer cryptocurrency network because of its diminishing security budget.

但是，以太坊的支持者試圖在這三個方面揭穿評論家的主張，將以太坊歸類為唯一真正分散的加密貨幣網絡。他指責比特幣，強調了由於其安全預算減少而對先鋒加密貨幣網絡進行51％攻擊的可能性。

“Respectfully, BTC is completely screwed because of its security budget. It would only cost $8B to 51% attack BTC today. When this gets down to $2B (AKA, BTC's security market cap becomes 0.1% of its asset market cap), a 51% attack is virtually certain to happen. This will leave BTC completely useless as SoV and open the door for another chain to take over. BTC maximalists like to say that BTC's market cap is $700B, but the relevant figure is its security market cap, which is the total value of coins held by non-early-stage entities like exchanges, hedge funds, and large BTC holders. Today, this is roughly $50B, and it's rapidly decreasing as more BTC flows into the hands of long-term holders who aren't interested in selling. As BTC's price increases, its security market cap decreases proportionally. This is because the smaller portion of BTC that is held by non-early-stage entities will be affected more significantly by the price increase, leading to a larger aggregate decrease in the security market cap. When BTC's security market cap reaches 0.1% of its asset market cap, which is about $2B, we can be sure that a 51% attack will occur, rendering BTC completely useless as SoV and paving the way for another chain to emerge as the dominant SoV if it manages to maintain a larger security market cap in relation to its asset market cap,” the Ethereum supporter wrote.

“尊敬的是，BTC由於其安全預算而被完全擰緊。今天它只會花費$ 8B至51％的攻擊BTC。當這降低到$ 2B時（aka，BTC的安全市場上限將成為其資產市值的0.1％），51％的攻擊實際上是肯定的。是$ 700B，但相關的數字是其安全市場上限，這是當今非美好的實體的總價值，如今，這大約是50B，這是$ 50B，並且隨著BTC流動的較小範圍而言，這是較小的價格，因為它不再是btc secort of there sucy of there coppers。當價格上漲的情況下，非自早期實體所持有的BTC將會更加顯著影響，從而導致安全市場上限的總數較大。以太坊支持者寫道：“設法維護了更大的安全市值。 ”

The supporter further stated that Ethereum remains the best bet for scalability in the blockchain ecosystem, considering its potential to accommodate multiple layer-2 protocols. He believes that, unlike its counterparts who are currently claiming to be more scalable, Ethereum has a brighter future and will surpass them.

支持者進一步指出，以太坊仍然是區塊鏈生態系統中可擴展性的最佳選擇，考慮到其可容納多層2方案的潛力。他認為，與目前聲稱更可擴展的同行不同，以太坊的未來更加光明，並且會超過它們。

Finally, pertaining to the blobspace argument, the Ethereum fan did not argue over the critic’s opinion. He aligned with the view that Ethereum’s blobspace is relatively limited, citing the high cost of running such a system on Ethereum compared to doing it with some VC AWS chains.

最後，與Blobspace的論點有關，以太坊的粉絲並沒有為評論家的觀點爭論。他與以太坊的BlobSpace相對有限的觀點保持一致，理由是與某些VC AWS連鎖店相比，在以太坊上運行這樣的系統的成本很高。

The Ethereum supporter concluded their defense by drawing an analogy comparing Ethereum with Windows and the wider internet, arguing that claims of the blockchain network trying to do too many things are unfounded. Instead, he considers this versatility a strength.

以太坊的支持者結束了他們的辯護，以比喻將以太坊與窗戶和更廣泛的互聯網進行比較，認為區塊鍊網絡試圖做太多事情的主張是沒有根據的。相反，他認為這種多功能性是一種優勢。

“The best analogy is Windows vs. Macintosh. Windows was never the best at any one thing but was good enough at everything and could be used by the greatest common factor. It became the standard operating system despite not having the best UI/UX like Macintosh or the best gaming capabilities or the best programming language support. Similarly, Ethereum is not the best at any one thing but is good enough at everything and can be used by the greatest common factor. It is the most decentralized chain, has the greatest potential for scalability with layer 2s, and is capable of supporting diverse use cases like DEFI, NFT, gaming, and Web3 applications. It is also the chain with the largest community and developer activity. In contrast, Bitcoin is excellent at SoV but has no potential for scalability and is vulnerable to a 51% attack due to its low security market cap. Solana is fast but suffers from poor decentralization and high gas fees. Finally, Celestia is scalable but lacks a large community and developer activity, and its blobs are more expensive to run than those on Ethereum, making it difficult to sustain in the long term,” the supporter added.

“最好的類比是Windows vs. Macintosh。Windows絕不是任何一件事都足夠好，但是可以用最大的共同因素使用，儘管沒有Macintosh或最好的遊戲能力或最佳的遊戲功能或最佳的程序語言，但它還是成為標準操作系統。與Ethere的相似，Ethereum在任何事情上都不足以達到所有用途，但在所有事物上都可以很好地使用，而且在任何事情上都可以很好地使用，並且可以很好地使用它的line，這是一個很棒的群體。具有2層的最大潛力，能夠支持Defi，NFT，遊戲和Web3應用程序，這也是具有最大的社區和開發人員活動的鏈條。支持者補充說：“缺乏龐大的社區和開發人員活動，並且它的漏洞比以太坊上的漏洞更昂貴，因此從長遠來看很難維持。 ”

Ultimately, the Ethereum supporter considers the famous blockchain network the most significant, one that would outlive its contemporaries in delivering efficient and diverse services to users.

最終，以太坊的支持者認為著名的區塊鍊網絡是最重要的，它將超過其同時代人在為用戶提供高效和多樣化的服務方面。