坚定的以太坊支持者强烈反对以太坊区块链网络正在挣扎的观念

一个坚定的以太坊支持者强烈反对以太坊区块链网络正在努力通过一次做太多事情而挣扎的观念

A staunch supporter of Ethereum has come to the fore, arguing vehemently against the assertion that the Ethereum blockchain network is struggling by trying to do too many things at once and subsequently “failing on all fronts.”

以太坊的坚定支持者脱颖而出，强烈争辩说，以太坊区块链网络正在努力挣扎，试图一次做太多事情，然后“在所有方面都失败”。

The Ethereum supporter’s argument, shared via an X post, stemmed from a response to a crypto critic who, in an earlier post, stated that Ethereum does not dominate any of the three sectors it is trying to be best at. The crypto critic highlighted serving as SoV commodity money, providing the most efficient scalability platform, and having more blobspace than any other network as the three sectors.

以太坊支持者的论点是通过X帖子分享的，源于对加密评论家的回应，在较早的帖子中，他说，以太坊并没有占主导地位的三个部门中的任何一个。加密评论家强调，用作Sov商品资金，提供最有效的可伸缩性平台，并且比其他任何网络都具有更多的Blobspace。

According to the critic, Bitcoin, Solana, and Celestia are better suited for each category, respectively, with Ethereum being the second-best in all the highlighted areas.

根据评论家的说法，比特币，Solana和Celestia分别更适合每个类别，以太坊在所有突出显示的领域中都是第二好的。

However, the Ethereum supporter attempted to debunk the critic’s claims on all three fronts, classifying Ethereum as the only truly decentralized cryptocurrency network. He berated Bitcoin, highlighting the possibility of a 51% attack on the pioneer cryptocurrency network because of its diminishing security budget.

但是，以太坊的支持者试图在这三个方面揭穿评论家的主张，将以太坊归类为唯一真正分散的加密货币网络。他指责比特币，强调了由于其安全预算减少而对先锋加密货币网络进行51％攻击的可能性。

“Respectfully, BTC is completely screwed because of its security budget. It would only cost $8B to 51% attack BTC today. When this gets down to $2B (AKA, BTC's security market cap becomes 0.1% of its asset market cap), a 51% attack is virtually certain to happen. This will leave BTC completely useless as SoV and open the door for another chain to take over. BTC maximalists like to say that BTC's market cap is $700B, but the relevant figure is its security market cap, which is the total value of coins held by non-early-stage entities like exchanges, hedge funds, and large BTC holders. Today, this is roughly $50B, and it's rapidly decreasing as more BTC flows into the hands of long-term holders who aren't interested in selling. As BTC's price increases, its security market cap decreases proportionally. This is because the smaller portion of BTC that is held by non-early-stage entities will be affected more significantly by the price increase, leading to a larger aggregate decrease in the security market cap. When BTC's security market cap reaches 0.1% of its asset market cap, which is about $2B, we can be sure that a 51% attack will occur, rendering BTC completely useless as SoV and paving the way for another chain to emerge as the dominant SoV if it manages to maintain a larger security market cap in relation to its asset market cap,” the Ethereum supporter wrote.

“尊敬的是，BTC由于其安全预算而被完全拧紧。今天它只会花费$ 8B至51％的攻击BTC。当这降低到$ 2B时（aka，BTC的安全市场上限将成为其资产市值的0.1％），51％的攻击实际上是肯定的。是$ 700B，但相关的数字是其安全市场上限，这是当今非美好的实体的总价值，如今，这大约是50B，这是$ 50B，并且随着BTC流动的较小范围而言，这是较小的价格，因为它不再是btc secort of there sucy of there coppers。当价格上涨的情况下，非自早期实体所持有的BTC将会更加显着影响，从而导致安全市场上限的总数较大。以太坊支持者写道：“设法维护了更大的安全市值。”

The supporter further stated that Ethereum remains the best bet for scalability in the blockchain ecosystem, considering its potential to accommodate multiple layer-2 protocols. He believes that, unlike its counterparts who are currently claiming to be more scalable, Ethereum has a brighter future and will surpass them.

支持者进一步指出，以太坊仍然是区块链生态系统中可扩展性的最佳选择，考虑到其可容纳多层2方案的潜力。他认为，与目前声称更可扩展的同行不同，以太坊的未来更加光明，并且会超过它们。

Finally, pertaining to the blobspace argument, the Ethereum fan did not argue over the critic’s opinion. He aligned with the view that Ethereum’s blobspace is relatively limited, citing the high cost of running such a system on Ethereum compared to doing it with some VC AWS chains.

最后，与Blobspace的论点有关，以太坊的粉丝并没有为评论家的观点争论。他与以太坊的BlobSpace相对有限的观点保持一致，理由是与某些VC AWS连锁店相比，在以太坊上运行这样的系统的成本很高。

The Ethereum supporter concluded their defense by drawing an analogy comparing Ethereum with Windows and the wider internet, arguing that claims of the blockchain network trying to do too many things are unfounded. Instead, he considers this versatility a strength.

以太坊的支持者结束了他们的辩护，以比喻将以太坊与窗户和更广泛的互联网进行比较，认为区块链网络试图做太多事情的主张是没有根据的。相反，他认为这种多功能性是一种优势。

“The best analogy is Windows vs. Macintosh. Windows was never the best at any one thing but was good enough at everything and could be used by the greatest common factor. It became the standard operating system despite not having the best UI/UX like Macintosh or the best gaming capabilities or the best programming language support. Similarly, Ethereum is not the best at any one thing but is good enough at everything and can be used by the greatest common factor. It is the most decentralized chain, has the greatest potential for scalability with layer 2s, and is capable of supporting diverse use cases like DEFI, NFT, gaming, and Web3 applications. It is also the chain with the largest community and developer activity. In contrast, Bitcoin is excellent at SoV but has no potential for scalability and is vulnerable to a 51% attack due to its low security market cap. Solana is fast but suffers from poor decentralization and high gas fees. Finally, Celestia is scalable but lacks a large community and developer activity, and its blobs are more expensive to run than those on Ethereum, making it difficult to sustain in the long term,” the supporter added.

“最好的类比是Windows vs. Macintosh。Windows绝不是任何一件事都足够好，但是可以用最大的共同因素使用，尽管没有Macintosh或最好的游戏能力或最佳的游戏功能或最佳的程序语言，但它还是成为标准操作系统。与Ethere的相似，Ethereum在任何事情上都不足以达到所有用途，但在所有事物上都可以很好地使用，而且在任何事情上都可以很好地使用，并且可以很好地使用它的line，这是一个很棒的群体。具有2层的最大潜力，能够支持Defi，NFT，游戏和Web3应用程序，这也是具有最大的社区和开发人员活动的链条。支持者补充说：“缺乏庞大的社区和开发人员活动，并且它的漏洞比以太坊上的漏洞更昂贵，因此从长远来看很难维持。”

Ultimately, the Ethereum supporter considers the famous blockchain network the most significant, one that would outlive its contemporaries in delivering efficient and diverse services to users.

最终，以太坊的支持者认为著名的区块链网络是最重要的，它将超过其同时代人在为用户提供高效和多样化的服务方面。