Sam Bankman Fried（SBF）25年徒刑激發辯論

薩姆·班克曼（Sam Bankman Fried）25年徒刑（SBF）的對話發生了變化。

The conversation around the 25-year prison sentence of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has changed. After some voices in the crypto community suggested that the punishment was too harsh, lawyer John Deaton stepped in with a strong opinion regarding the conversation. His comments have added a new twist to the ongoing debate about whether justice was served.

薩姆·班克曼（Sam Bankman Fried）25年徒刑（SBF）的對話發生了變化。在加密社區中的一些聲音暗示懲罰太嚴厲，律師約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）對談話提出了強烈的看法。他的評論為正在進行的有關是否有正義的辯論增加了新的轉折。

Community Member Zach Revisits SBF Sentence

社區成員Zach重新訪問SBF句子

In a recent post on X, a crypto community member named Zach questioned whether Bankman-Fried’s sentence was too harsh.

在X上最近的一篇文章中，一位名叫扎克（Zach）的加密社區成員質疑班克曼（Bankman）的判決是否太苛刻。

“Is 25 years too harsh for SBF? I feel like his customers are being paid back in full plus interest. It wasn’t that FTX went bankrupt; they had cash flow problems. Yes, combining FTX customer funds and Alameda was illegal, but it feels like poor management rather than criminal intent. Sam might have made decisions based on utilitarianism and effective altruism. Not greed. But maybe I’m out of touch. Thoughts?” asked Zach.

“對於SBF而言，25年對SBF太苛刻了嗎？我覺得他的客戶被全額償還了興趣。這不是FTX破產；他們存在現金流問題。是的，將FTX客戶基金和Alameda結合在一起是非法的，但感覺就像是不良的管理，而是犯罪的意圖，而不是犯罪的意圖。Sam可能是基於功利主義和有效的Altruism。但我的觸覺。扎克問。

While he admitted that combining FTX customer funds with Alameda Research was illegal, Zach believed it was a case of poor management rather than criminal intent. He said Sam might have made decisions based on utilitarianism and effective altruism, rather than acting out of greed.

儘管他承認將FTX客戶資金與阿拉米達研究相結合是非法的，但扎克認為這是管理不善而不是犯罪意圖的情況。他說，山姆可能是基於功利主義和有效的利他主義做出的決定，而不是出於貪婪。

After facing pushback from community members regarding his opinion, Zach quickly clarified that he was not arguing SBF’s innocence. Instead, he believed a 25-year sentence without parole for poor decision-making was not justice.

在面對社區成員就自己的意見的反擊之後，扎克很快澄清說，他沒有辯論SBF的純真。取而代之的是，他認為因決策不良而沒有假釋的25年徒刑不是正義。

“I’m not saying he's innocent. He lied repeatedly, broke the law, and people lost money. But 25 years without parole for poor decision-making and no greed seems harsh, especially considering he's paying back creditors in full with interest. To me, it feels like a sentence for a violent crime, which this wasn’t. Of course, ultimately it's up to the judge and the legal system to decide on the sentence, and I respect their decision. I'm just sharing my thoughts on the matter. I'd love to hear what others think as well,” he added.

我並不是說他是無辜的。他反复撒謊，違反了法律，人們損失了錢。但是25年沒有假釋，因為決策不佳，貪婪似乎很苛刻，尤其是考慮到他正在全額償還債權人，這對我來說，這就像暴力犯罪一樣，這不是一個暴力犯罪，這當然不是由法律制度和我的決定，我對我的判決進行了重要的判斷，我對我的決定是我的決定。我是我的決定。別人的想法。 ”他補充說。

John Deaton Shares Hot Take

約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）分享熱門

Meanwhile, John Deaton does not hold back when he responds to Zach’s argument. In his X post on social networking site X, Deaton said Sam should be enjoying every year of his 25-year sentence without parole.

同時，當約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）回應扎克（Zach）的論點時，他沒有退縮。 Deaton在社交網站X上的X帖子中說，山姆應該享受他25年徒刑的每年而沒有假釋。

“Sam's parents, Joe Bankman and Barbara Fried, should also be facing prison time. The trial evidence, private chats, showed Sam's public image of altruism was fake. He showed no remorse after the collapse of FTX. And Sam donated $10M to the Biden administration. Former Florida AG Pam Bondi should reopen the SBF campaign finance fraud case that was dropped because it involved elected officials. It's a disgrace that it was dismissed. #FTX /

“山姆的父母，喬·班克曼（Joe Bankman）和芭芭拉·弗里德（Barbara Fried）也應該面臨監禁時間。審判證據，私人聊天，表明山姆（Sam）對利他主義的公開形像是假的。他在Ftx倒閉後沒有表現出re悔。解僱#FTX /