Sam Bankman Fried（SBF）25年徒刑激发辩论

萨姆·班克曼（Sam Bankman Fried）25年徒刑（SBF）的对话发生了变化。

The conversation around the 25-year prison sentence of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has changed. After some voices in the crypto community suggested that the punishment was too harsh, lawyer John Deaton stepped in with a strong opinion regarding the conversation. His comments have added a new twist to the ongoing debate about whether justice was served.

萨姆·班克曼（Sam Bankman Fried）25年徒刑（SBF）的对话发生了变化。在加密社区中的一些声音暗示惩罚太严厉，律师约翰·迪顿（John Deaton）对谈话提出了强烈的看法。他的评论为正在进行的有关是否有正义的辩论增加了新的转折。

Community Member Zach Revisits SBF Sentence

社区成员Zach重新访问SBF句子

In a recent post on X, a crypto community member named Zach questioned whether Bankman-Fried’s sentence was too harsh.

在X上最近的一篇文章中，一位名叫扎克（Zach）的加密社区成员质疑班克曼（Bankman）的判决是否太苛刻。

“Is 25 years too harsh for SBF? I feel like his customers are being paid back in full plus interest. It wasn’t that FTX went bankrupt; they had cash flow problems. Yes, combining FTX customer funds and Alameda was illegal, but it feels like poor management rather than criminal intent. Sam might have made decisions based on utilitarianism and effective altruism. Not greed. But maybe I’m out of touch. Thoughts?” asked Zach.

“对于SBF而言，25年对SBF太苛刻了吗？我觉得他的客户被全额偿还了兴趣。这不是FTX破产；他们存在现金流问题。是的，将FTX客户基金和Alameda结合在一起是非法的，但感觉就像是不良的管理，而是犯罪的意图，而不是犯罪的意图。Sam可能是基于功利主义和有效的Altruism。但我的触觉。扎克问。

While he admitted that combining FTX customer funds with Alameda Research was illegal, Zach believed it was a case of poor management rather than criminal intent. He said Sam might have made decisions based on utilitarianism and effective altruism, rather than acting out of greed.

尽管他承认将FTX客户资金与阿拉米达研究相结合是非法的，但扎克认为这是管理不善而不是犯罪意图的情况。他说，山姆可能是基于功利主义和有效的利他主义做出的决定，而不是出于贪婪。

After facing pushback from community members regarding his opinion, Zach quickly clarified that he was not arguing SBF’s innocence. Instead, he believed a 25-year sentence without parole for poor decision-making was not justice.

在面对社区成员就自己的意见的反击之后，扎克很快澄清说，他没有辩论SBF的纯真。取而代之的是，他认为因决策不良而没有假释的25年徒刑不是正义。

“I’m not saying he's innocent. He lied repeatedly, broke the law, and people lost money. But 25 years without parole for poor decision-making and no greed seems harsh, especially considering he's paying back creditors in full with interest. To me, it feels like a sentence for a violent crime, which this wasn’t. Of course, ultimately it's up to the judge and the legal system to decide on the sentence, and I respect their decision. I'm just sharing my thoughts on the matter. I'd love to hear what others think as well,” he added.

我并不是说他是无辜的。他反复撒谎，违反了法律，人们损失了钱。但是25年没有假释，因为决策不佳，贪婪似乎很苛刻，尤其是考虑到他正在全额偿还债权人，这对我来说，这就像暴力犯罪一样，这不是一个暴力犯罪，这当然不是由法律制度和我的决定，我对我的判决进行了重要的判断，我对我的决定是我的决定。我是我的决定。别人的想法。”他补充说。

John Deaton Shares Hot Take

约翰·迪顿（John Deaton）分享热门

Meanwhile, John Deaton does not hold back when he responds to Zach’s argument. In his X post on social networking site X, Deaton said Sam should be enjoying every year of his 25-year sentence without parole.

同时，当约翰·迪顿（John Deaton）回应扎克（Zach）的论点时，他没有退缩。 Deaton在社交网站X上的X帖子中说，山姆应该享受他25年徒刑的每年而没有假释。

“Sam's parents, Joe Bankman and Barbara Fried, should also be facing prison time. The trial evidence, private chats, showed Sam's public image of altruism was fake. He showed no remorse after the collapse of FTX. And Sam donated $10M to the Biden administration. Former Florida AG Pam Bondi should reopen the SBF campaign finance fraud case that was dropped because it involved elected officials. It's a disgrace that it was dismissed. #FTX /

“山姆的父母，乔·班克曼（Joe Bankman）和芭芭拉·弗里德（Barbara Fried）也应该面临监禁时间。审判证据，私人聊天，表明山姆（Sam）对利他主义的公开形象是假的。他在Ftx倒闭后没有表现出re悔。解雇#FTX /